RESUMEN
The "Viennese Instrument for Suicidality in Correctional Institutions" (VISCI) presented here is based on the results of a large case-control study and on research on literature examining suicide prevention in general and in the prison population in particular. The aim of this study was to validate the properties of the VISCI to differentiate between suicides and nonsuicides. The sensitivity and specificity of the VISCI was tested in the files of 55 correctional suicides, and 110 controls. VISCI differentiated well between suicides and nonsuicides. The routine administration of the VISCI may help to direct the existing professional attention to inmates with the highest need.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Prisioneros/psicología , Pruebas Psicológicas , Prevención del Suicidio , Austria , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Análisis por Apareamiento , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few risk factors and indicators of vulnerability for suicide in custody are known so far. AIMS: A case-control study was conducted to investigate the relevance of criminal history, psychiatric morbidity and social integration to suicide in prison. METHOD: For every suicide that occurred in an Austrian correctional institution between 1975 and 1999, two controls matched for correctional institution, gender, nationality, age, custodial status and time of admission were selected. Psychiatric characteristics, previous suicidal behaviour, criminal history and indicators of social integration were compared. RESULTS: Of 250 recorded suicides, 220 personal files were available and matched to 440 controls. The most important predictors for suicide in custody were a history of suicidality (status following attempted suicide and suicide threat), psychiatric diagnosis, psychotropic medication, a highly violent index offence and single- cell accommodation. CONCLUSIONS: A significant finding is the importance of suicidal behaviour as an indicator of risk of suicide in correctional institutions, which until now has been a matter of debate. This study demonstrates the need for staff to take suicidal behaviour as seriously in custodial settings as in any other circumstances.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
An unequal distribution of suicides over months and seasons has been a consistent finding in epidemiological surveys on suicide. Jails and prisons are a high-risk setting for suicide all over the world. The high prevalence of both outward and self-directed violence in prison populations indicates dysfunctional central serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission and, therefore, could account for an unequal distribution of suicides over months and seasons due to underlying bioclimatic factors. Within a total survey of suicides in the Austrian penitentiary system, the weekly, monthly and seasonal distribution of custodial suicides between 1947 and 1999 was studied. After an explorative comparison of suicide distribution over weekdays, months and seasons of the year by chi2-tests, a harmonic Poisson regression model was performed to detect seasonality of suicides. No unequal distribution of suicides was evident over the 53-year period. A limitation of this study was its sample size of 412, a low number compared with population-based samples, where a spring suicide peak was consistently found. An explanation for lacking seasonality could be that bioclimatic factors are less relevant in urban, industrialized areas, where jails and prisons usually are located. One of the core characteristics of penal institutions is the limited possibility for communication and social interaction. This social isolation is independent of seasonal changes. If the individual's possibilities for social interactions are limited, the influence of seasonal changes in social activities may be less relevant. This could explain the absence of seasonal changes in custodial suicide incidence.
Asunto(s)
Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Prisiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Estaciones del Año , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Austria/epidemiología , Causalidad , Causas de Muerte , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Periodicidad , Distribución de Poisson , Prisioneros/psicología , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/tendenciasRESUMEN
Following clinical observations in this study a comparison was undertaken between nonsexualized rapists, sexualized rapists, and pedophilic child molesters in terms of psychometric measures, criminological data, and DSM-IV diagnoses following the authors' hypotheses that nonsexualized and sexualized rapists differ in respect of psychiatric comorbidity and criminal history and sexualized rapists and pedophilic child molesters are more similar as regards to psychiatric comorbidity (anxiety, depression, and aggression) and criminal history variables than nonsexualized and sexualized rapists are. Preliminary findings confirmed the hypotheses: the authors found significant differences between paraphilic and sexualized sex offenders on one hand--regardless whether they had offended against minors or adults--and a group of sex offenders exhibiting a history of high lifestyle impulsivity on the other hand. From a psychiatric clinical point of view, paraphilic or sexualized rapists could be shown to resemble more the pedophilic child molesters. Therapeutic approaches should take these findings into account.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Impulsiva/diagnóstico , Estilo de Vida , Trastornos Parafílicos/diagnóstico , Pedofilia/psicología , Violación/psicología , Delitos Sexuales/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Abuso Sexual Infantil/prevención & control , Abuso Sexual Infantil/psicología , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Conducta Impulsiva/psicología , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Trastornos Parafílicos/psicología , Pedofilia/prevención & control , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría , Violación/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Delitos Sexuales/prevención & controlRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Suicide rates in correctional institutions have been increasing during the last decades. There has been little interest in whether suicidal ideation and intent has been documented by non-medical prison staff (reports of attempted suicide, suicide threats, self-harm), and whether these signs of suicidality had the consequence of adequate intervention efforts. METHODS: The personal files of inmates who committed suicide in the 29 Austrian jails and prisons during the last 25 years (1975-1999) were included. We analysed personal characteristics, criminological data, circumstances of custody and information about psychiatric disorders and treatment. RESULTS: Of a total of 250 suicides, 220 personal files were available and included. Suicide attempts were known in 50% of all suicides and 37% had expressed suicidality. In >20%, non-medical staff had documented signs of suicidality, but no further preventive action (e.g. referral to psychiatric care) had taken place. CONCLUSION: Signs of suicidality play an important role in vulnerability profiles for jail and prison suicides and should have the minimal consequence of further psychiatric care.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Prisioneros/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Austria/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/mortalidad , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Prisiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Prevención del SuicidioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Poststroke depression is a frequent psychiatric complication after stroke that may have strong negative impact on rehabilitation therapy and functional recovery. This study was conducted to show the efficacy and safety of early treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine in post-stroke depressed patients. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study was of patients within two weeks after stroke. Moderate to severe depressed patients (determined by Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) > 15, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale) were randomized to receive either 20 mg/d fluoxetine or placebo for 3 months. Beside the psychiatric assessment, patients were evaluated by use of the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE) and the Barthel-Index (BI). An open-label long-term follow up was done 18 months after the initial assessment. RESULTS: 54 depressed patients of an inpatient population of 242 consecutive stroke patients aged 25 to 85 years entered the trial within the first two weeks post-stroke. 50 patients completed the trial per-protocol. The initial severity of depression was comparable in the two groups (mean baseline HDS score 32.8 in the fluoxetine vs. 30.3 in the placebo group), as were neurological symptom severity and demographic parameters. Significant improvement was seen in both groups within 4 weeks of treatment, whereas no advantages of fluoxetine could be observed at this time. This indicates a high degree of spontaneous recovery during early rehabilitation therapy. BDI scores of patients treated with fluoxetine further decreased until the follow-up at 12 weeks, whereas the scores increased again in the placebo group. This depressive relapse of the placebo patients after the end of most rehabilitation efforts was evident at a long-term follow-up 18 months after inclusion, when patients who had been treated with fluoxetine were significantly less depressed. No side effects of fluoxetine treatment were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of fluoxetine were obvious at the follow-up 18 months after inclusion, but could not be demonstrated within the first three months of controlled treatment. The multitude of therapeutic efforts that take place in the early phase of rehabilitation might have facilitated spontaneous recovery from depression and might have hindered benefits of antidepressant treatment to become obvious. Fluoxetine treatment was well tolerated and safe.