Variation in type and frequency of diagnostic imaging during trauma care across multiple time points by patient insurance type.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that uninsured patients receive fewer radiographic studies during trauma care, but less is known as to whether differences in care are present among other insurance groups or across different time points during hospitalization. Our objective was to examine the number of radiographic studies administered to a cohort of trauma patients over the entire hospital stay as well as during the first 24-hours of care. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from an American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified Level I Trauma Center between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. We used negative binomial regression to construct relative risk (RR) ratios for type and frequency of radiographic imaging received among persons with Medicare, Medicaid, no insurance, or government insurance plans in reference to those with commercial indemnity plans. The analysis was adjusted for patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, injury severity score, injury mechanism, comorbidities, complications, hospital length of stay, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: A total of 3621 records from surviving patients age > =18 years were assessed. After adjustment for potential confounders, the expected number of radiographic studies decreased by 15 % among Medicare recipients (RR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.78-0.93), 11 % among Medicaid recipients (0.89, 0.81-0.99), 10 % among the uninsured (0.90, 0.85-0.96) and 19 % among government insurance groups (0.81, 0.72-0.90), compared with the reference group. This disparity was observed during the first 24-hours of care among patients with Medicare (0.78, 0.71-0.86) and government insurance plans (0.83, 0.74-0.94). Overall, there were no differences in the number of radiographic studies among the uninsured or among Medicaid patients during the first 24-hours of care compared with the reference group, but differences were observed among the uninsured in a sub-analysis of severely injured patients (ISS > 15). CONCLUSIONS: Both uninsured and insured patients treated at a not-for-profit verified Level I Trauma Center receive fewer radiographic studies than patients with commercial indemnity plans, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic confounders. There is less disparity in care during the first 24-hours, which suggests that patient pathology is the determining factor for radiographic evaluation during the acute care phase. Results from this study offer initial evidence of disparity in diagnostic imaging across multiple insurance groups over different periods of trauma care.

Mild hyperglycemia, but not glucagon-like peptide 1 predicts poor outcome after injury.

BACKGROUND: Loss of glucose homeostasis occurs frequently in injured patients. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a gut-derived incretin hormone that stimulates insulin and decreases glucagon secretion. The impact of the incretin system on glycemic control in injured patients has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that glycemic control in injured patients is influenced by circulating levels of GLP-1. METHODS: A prospective, observational pilot study was conducted at a state-designated level 1 trauma center. Patients with injuries requiring admission to the intensive care unit were eligible for inclusion. Patients with preinjury diabetes were excluded. Normoglycemic patients served as the control group. The hyperglycemic group consisted of patients with initial blood glucose levels > 150 mg/dL. Mann-Whitney and χ(2) tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eleven controls and 19 hyperglycemic patients entered the study. The study group required ventilation more frequently (P = .047). Hyperglycemia (P = .029), but not GLP-1 level (P = .371), predicted mortality. GLP-1 levels varied greatly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 levels varied in both control and hyperglycemic groups. Mortality and mechanical ventilation rates were higher in patients with hyperglycemia.

Predicting outcome of patients with chest wall injury.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures occur in 10% of injured patients, are associated with morbidity and mortality, and frequently necessitate intensive care unit (ICU) care. A scoring system that identifies the risk for respiratory failure early in the evaluation process may allow early intervention to improve outcomes. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a scoring system based on initial clinical findings can identify patients with rib fractures at greatest risk for morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A simple scoring system to stratify risk was developed and applied to patients through a retrospective trauma registry review. Points were assigned as follows: age < 45 years = 1 point, age 45 to 65 years = 2 points, age > 65 years = 3 points; <3 fractures = 1 point, 3 to 5 fractures = 2 points, >5 fractures = 3 points; no pulmonary contusion = 0 points, mild pulmonary contusion = 1 point, severe pulmonary contusion = 2 points, bilateral pulmonary contusion = 3 points; and bilateral rib fracture absent = 0 points, bilateral rib fracture absent present = 2 points. A review of trauma registry patients with rib fractures (June 2008 to February 2010) at a state-designated level 1 trauma center was performed. Data reviewed included age, number of fractures, bilateral injury, presence of pulmonary contusion, classification of the contusion, length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and length of stay. The scoring system was retrospectively applied to 649 patients to determine validity. RESULTS: A score ≤ 7 indicated lower mortality (24 of 579 [4.2%]) compared with patients with scores > 7 (10 of 70 [14.3%]) (Fisher's 2-sided P = .0018). Patients with scores ≤ 6 were less likely to be admitted to an ICU (29.7%) compared with those with scores ≥ 7 (56.7%) (P < .0001). Patients with total scores < 7 were less likely to require intubation (20.6%) compared with those with scores ≥ 7 (40.0%) (P < .0001). Patients with scores ≤ 4 had shorter lengths of stay (36.0% <5 days) compared with those who had scores > 4 (59.7%) (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system predicts the likelihood that patients will require mechanical ventilation and prolonged courses of care. A score of 7 or 8 predicted increased risk for mortality, admission to the ICU, and intubation. A score > 5 predicted a longer length of stay and a longer period of ventilation. This scoring system may assist in the earlier implementation of treatment strategies such epidural anesthesia, ventilation, and operative fixation of fractures.

New technique to prevent tilt during inferior vena cava filter placement.

PURPOSE: The risk of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt during placement is significant and may limit filter retrieval. The purpose of the study was to determine if tilting of IVC filters on deployment is able to be reduced when using a femoral approach. METHODS: Under fluoroscopic guidance, Cook Celect IVC filters that are not in axis with the IVC prior to full deployment were straightened in the long IVC axis using a stiff guidewire prior to release. This guidewire helps to center the apex of the filter in the IVC and allow proper deployment. RESULTS: All 11 IVC filters deployed with this technique have been placed without tilt. No complications were encountered with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: IVC filter tilt may lessen their efficacy and ability to be easily retrieved. By using this technique, we have virtually eliminated IVC filter tilt in our patients.