The features of male breast cancer in China: A real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease. Although several large-scale studies have investigated MBC patients in other countries, the features of MBC patients in China have not been fully explored. This study aims to explore the features of Chinese MBC patients comprehensively. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of MBC patients from 36 centers in China. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analyses. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors of the patients. RESULTS: In total, 1119 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.9 years, and a significant extension over time was observed (P < 0.001). The majority of the patients (89.1 %) received mastectomy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 7.8 % of the patients diagnosed in 2009 or earlier, and this percentage increased significantly to 38.8 % in 2020 or later (P < 0.001). The five-year OS rate for the population was 85.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 82.8 %-88.4 %]. Multivariate Cox analysis identified taxane-based [T-based, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32, 95 % CI, 0.13 to 0.78, P = 0.012] and anthracycline plus taxane-based (A + T-based, HR = 0.47, 95 % CI, 0.23 to 0.96, P = 0.037) regimens as independent protective factors for OS. However, the anthracycline-based regimen showed no significance in outcome (P = 0.175). CONCLUSION: As the most extensive MBC study in China, we described the characteristics, treatment and prognosis of Chinese MBC population comprehensively. T-based and A + T-based regimens were protective factors for OS in these patients. More research is required for this population.

Prognostic value of EIF5A2 in solid tumors: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis.

Aims: In cancer biology, the aberrant overexpression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 (EIF5A2) has been correlative with an ominous prognosis, thereby underscoring its pivotal role in fostering metastatic progression. Consequently, EIF5A2 has garnered significant attention as a compelling prognostic biomarker for various malignancies. Our research endeavors were thus aimed at elucidating the utility and significance of EIF5A2 as a robust indicator of cancer outcome prediction. Method: An exhaustive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases found relevant studies. The link between EIF5A2 and survival prognosis was examined using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Subsequently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) databases were employed to validate EIF5A2 expression across various cancer types. Results: Through pooled analysis, we found that increased EIF5A2 expression was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival/progression-free survival/relapse-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS). Moreover, TCGA analysis revealed that EIF5A2 was significantly upregulated in 27 types of cancer, with overexpression being linked to shorter OS in three, worse DFS in two, and worse PFS in six types of cancer. GEPIA showed that patients with EIF5A2 overexpression had reduced OS and DFS. Conclusions: In solid tumors, EIF5A2 emerges as a reliable prognostic marker. Our meta-analysis comprehensively analyzed the prognostic value of EIF5A2 in solid tumors and assessed its efficacy as a predictive marker.

A nomogram for predicting pathologic node negativity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a nationwide, multicenter retrospective cohort study (CSBrS-012).

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with pathologic node-negativity (ypN0) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram. Methods: The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female patients with primary breast cancer treated with NAC followed by breast and axillary surgery in 20 hospitals across China. In the present study, 7,711 eligible patients were included, comprising 6,428 patients in the primary cohort from 15 hospitals and 1,283 patients in the external validation cohort from five hospitals. The hospitals were randomly assigned. The primary cohort was randomized at a 3:1 ratio and divided into a training set and an internal validation set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the training set, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated both internally and externally. Results: In total, 3,560 patients (46.2%) achieved ypN0, and 1,558 patients (20.3%) achieved pathologic complete response in the breast (bpCR). A nomogram was constructed based on the clinical nodal stage before NAC (cN), ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, NAC treatment cycle, and bpCR, which were independently associated with ypN0. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.80. The internal and external validation demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs of 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusion: We present a real-world study based on nationwide large-sample data that can be used to effectively screen for ypN0 to provide better advice for the management of residual axillary disease in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC.

Patient preferences and willingness to pay for central venous access devices in breast cancer: A multicenter discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Despite being a significant management decision in clinical or nursing practice, there is limited understanding of the preferences regarding risks, benefits, costs, and other attributes of patients with breast cancer when selecting peripherally inserted central catheters or totally implanted ports. The objective of this study is to investigate the preferences of patients with breast cancer who require chemotherapy when selecting an optimal central venous access device. METHODS: Data on patients' preferences for central venous access devices were collected using a face-to-face discrete choice experiment from the oncology departments of three public hospitals in China representing the eastern (Zhejiang province), central (Henan province), and western (Sichuan province) regions. The study used six attributes to describe the preferences of breast cancer patients for central venous access devices, including out-of-pocket cost, limitations in activities of daily living, catheter maintenance frequency, risk of catheter-related thrombosis, risk of catheter-related infection, and size of incision. Data were analyzed using a conditional logit model and mixed logit model. The marginal willingness to pay (mWTP) was calculated by assessing the ratio of the preference for other attributes to the preference for out-of-pocket cost. RESULTS: A total of 573 respondents completed the survey. The discrete choice experiment results showed that respondents strongly preferred a central venous access device with a catheter maintenance frequency of one time a month (vs four times a month, ß = 1.188, p < 0.001), the lower risk of catheter-related thrombosis (2 % vs 10 %, ß = 1.068; p < 0.001) and lower risk of catheter-related infection (2 % vs 8 % risk: ß = 0.824; p < 0.001). Respondents were willing to pay CNY ¥11,968.1 (US$1776.5) for a central venous access device with a catheter maintenance frequency of one time a month rather than four times a month, ¥10,753.6 (US$1596.2) for a central venous access device with 2 % thrombosis risk over one with 10 %, and ¥8302.0 (US$1232.3) for a central venous access device with 2 % infection risk over one with 8 %. Respondents with longer travel time to the hospital, younger than 50 years old, and with urban employee basic medical insurance were willing to pay more for an improvement in the attributes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients with breast cancer were mainly concerned with the out-of-pocket cost, catheter maintenance frequency, risk of catheter-related thrombosis and risk of catheter-related infection when choosing a central venous access device for the delivery of chemotherapy. In clinical or nursing practice, when making central venous access device recommendation for young patients and those who live far from hospitals, totally implanted ports may be a preferable choice.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in gBRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment. METHODS: Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status. CONCLUSION: Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.

Axillary lymph node dissection in triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer patients with clinical N2 achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: Is it necessary?

AIM: This study aims to identify suitable candidates for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) among clinical N2 (cN2) triple-negative (TN) or HER2 positive (HER2+）breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy（NAT）. BACKGROUND: Despite the substantial axillary burden in cN2 breast cancer patients, high pathological response rates can be achieved with NAT in TN or HER2+ subtypes, thus enabling potential downstaging of axillary surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the CSBrS-012 study, screening 709 patients with initial cN2, either HER2+ or TN subtype, from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020. The correlation between axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) (yPN0) and breast pCR was examined. RESULTS: Among the 177 cN2 patients who achieved breast pCR through NAT, 138 (78.0 %) also achieved axillary pCR. However, in the 532 initial clinical N2 patients who did not achieve breast pCR, residual axillary lymph node metastasis persisted in 77.4 % (412/532) of cases. The relative risk of residual axillary lymph node metastasis in patients who did not achieve breast pCR was 12.4 (8.1-19.1), compared to those who did achieve breast pCR, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: For cN2 TN or HER2+ breast cancer patients who achieve breast pCR following NAT, consideration could be given to downstaging and performing an axillary SLNB or TAD.

Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has generated mixed results. TORCHLIGHT is a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) (n = 353; experimental arm) versus placebo and nab-P (n = 178; control arm) for the treatment of women with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent central review in the PD-L1-positive and intention-to-treat populations. The secondary end points included overall survival and safety. Overall, 200 and 100 patients, in the toripalimab and placebo arm respectively had PD-L1-positive TNBC. At the prespecified interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in PFS assessed by a blinded independent central review was demonstrated in the experimental arm in the PD-L1-positive population (median PFS 8.4 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.470-0.906, P = 0.0102). The median overall survival was 32.8 versus 19.5 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.414-0.914, P = 0.0148). Similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (99.2% versus 98.9%), grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (56.4% versus 54.3%) and fatal AEs (0.6% versus 3.4%) occurred in the experimental and control arms. The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1-positive patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC with an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT03777579 .

Deep Learning of Multimodal Ultrasound: Stratifying the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Before Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Not only should resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) be considered in patients with breast cancer but also the possibility of achieving a pathologic complete response (PCR) after NAC. Our study aims to develop 2 multimodal ultrasound deep learning (DL) models to noninvasively predict resistance and PCR to NAC before treatment. METHODS: From January 2017 to July 2022, a total of 170 patients with breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent multimodal ultrasound examination (grayscale 2D ultrasound and ultrasound elastography) before NAC. We combined clinicopathological information to develop 2 DL models, DL_Clinical_resistance and DL_Clinical_PCR, for predicting resistance and PCR to NAC, respectively. In addition, these 2 models were combined to stratify the prediction of response to NAC. RESULTS: In the test cohort, DL_Clinical_resistance had an AUC of 0.911 (95%CI, 0.814-0.979) with a sensitivity of 0.905 (95%CI, 0.765-1.000) and an NPV of 0.882 (95%CI, 0.708-1.000). Meanwhile, DL_Clinical_PCR achieved an AUC of 0.880 (95%CI, 0.751-0.973) and sensitivity and NPV of 0.875 (95%CI, 0.688-1.000) and 0.895 (95%CI, 0.739-1.000), respectively. By combining DL_Clinical_resistance and DL_Clinical_PCR, 37.1% of patients with resistance and 25.7% of patients with PCR were successfully identified by the combined model, suggesting that these patients could benefit by an early change of treatment strategy or by implementing an organ preservation strategy after NAC. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed DL_Clinical_resistance and DL_Clinical_PCR models and combined strategy have the potential to predict resistance and PCR to NAC before treatment and allow stratified prediction of NAC response.

Chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapy in breast cancer: Recent progress in China.

Breast cancer (BC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer in China. Despite conventional treatment strategies, BC patients often have poor therapeutic outcomes, leading to significant global cancer mortality rates. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based immunotherapy is a promising and innovative approach for cancer treatment that redirects immune cells to attack tumor cells expressing selected tumor antigens (TAs). T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophages, key components of the immune system, are used in CAR-based immunotherapies. Although remarkable progress has been made with CAR-T cells in hematologic malignancies, the application of CAR-based immunotherapy to BC has lagged. This is partly due to obstacles such as tumor heterogeneity, which is further associated with the TA and BC subtypes, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Several combinatorial approaches, including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and antitumor drugs, have been proposed to overcome these obstacles in BC treatment. Furthermore, several CAR-based immunotherapies for BC have been translated into clinical trials. This review provides an overview of the recent progress in CAR-based immunotherapy for BC treatment, including targeting of TAs, consideration of BC subtypes, assessment of the TME, and exploration of combinatorial therapies. The authors focused on preclinical studies and clinical trials of CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, and CAR-macrophages especially conducted in China, followed by an internal comparison and discussion of current limits. In conclusion, this review elucidates China's contribution to CAR-based immunotherapies for BC and provides inspiration for further research. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Despite conventional treatment strategies, breast cancer (BC) patients in China often have poor therapeutic outcomes. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based immunotherapy, a promising approach, can redirect immune cells to kill tumor cells expressing selected tumor antigens (TAs). However, obstacles such as TA selection, BC subtypes, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment still exist. Therefore, various combinatorial approaches have been proposed. This article elucidates several Chinese CAR-based preclinical and clinical studies in BC treatment with comparisons of foreign research, and CAR-immune cells are analyzed, providing inspiration for further research.

Exploring the crosstalk between endothelial cells, immune cells, and immune checkpoints in the tumor microenvironment: new insights and therapeutic implications.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly intricate milieu, comprising a multitude of components, including immune cells and stromal cells, that exert a profound influence on tumor initiation and progression. Within the TME, angiogenesis is predominantly orchestrated by endothelial cells (ECs), which foster the proliferation and metastasis of malignant cells. The interplay between tumor and immune cells with ECs is complex and can either bolster or hinder the immune system. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the intricate crosstalk between ECs and immune cells is essential to advance the development of immunotherapeutic interventions. Despite recent progress, the underlying molecular mechanisms that govern the interplay between ECs and immune cells remain elusive. Nevertheless, the immunomodulatory function of ECs has emerged as a pivotal determinant of the immune response. In light of this, the study of the relationship between ECs and immune checkpoints has garnered considerable attention in the field of immunotherapy. By targeting specific molecular pathways and signaling molecules associated with ECs in the TME, novel immunotherapeutic strategies may be devised to enhance the efficacy of current treatments. In this vein, we sought to elucidate the relationship between ECs, immune cells, and immune checkpoints in the TME, with the ultimate goal of identifying novel therapeutic targets and charting new avenues for immunotherapy.

Nomogram for predicting axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The prediction of axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) becoming critical because of the advocation of the de-escalation of axillary management. We investigate associated factors of axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative (cN0) breast cancer patients receiving NAC to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1892 breast cancer patients with stage of cT1-3N0 treated by NAC and subsequent surgery between 2010 and 2020 in twenty hospitals across China. Patients randomly divided into a training set and validation set (3:1). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated. RESULTS: In total, pathologic node negativity (ypN0) achieved in 1406 (74.3%) patients and another 486 (25.7%) patients upstaged to pathologic node positive (ypN+). Breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) was achieved in 445 (23.5%) patients and non-bpCR in 1447 (76.5%) patients. A nomogram was established by ER, tumor histology, HER2 status, cycle of NAC treatment, and the bpCR, which were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis as independent predictors of nodal upstaging in the training cohort (n = 1419). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the training cohort and validation cohort (n = 473) were 0.73 (95% CI 0.693-0.751) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.723-0.812) respectively. CONCLUSION: We present a nomogram with a nationwide large sample data which can effectively predict axillary upstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to give better advice for individualized axillary lymph node management of breast cancer.

Efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: a nationwide, multicenter, 10-year retrospective study (CSBrS-012).

Background: In the era of targeted therapy, whether patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are exempted from anthracycline usage in the neoadjuvant setting is controversial. Objectives: Our objective was to retrospectively analyze the differences in pathological complete remission (pCR) rates between the anthracycline group and the nonanthracycline group. Design: The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female primary breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who underwent standard breast and axillary surgery post-NAC. Methods: A logistic proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the association of covariates with pCR. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics, and subgroup analyses were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: A total of 2507 patients were enrolled: the anthracycline group (n = 1581, 63%) and the nonanthracycline group (n = 926, 37%). A pCR was recorded in 17.1% (271/1581) of patients in the anthracycline group and in 29.3% (271/926) in the nonanthracycline group, and the difference in the pCR rate between the two groups was statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.65-2.43); p < 0.001). In the subsequent subgroup analysis, substantial differences in pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups were detected in the nontargeted [OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.13-3.23); p = 0.015] and dual-HER2-targeted populations [OR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.33-0.92); p = 0.021) before PSM, whereas differences vanished after PSM. The pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups did not differ for the single target population, either before or after PSM. Conclusion: In the presence of trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, the pCR rate of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving anthracycline was not superior to that of patients receiving nonanthracycline. Thus, our study further provides clinical evidence for exempting anthracycline treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy.

lncRNA BREA2 promotes metastasis by disrupting the WWP2-mediated ubiquitination of Notch1.

Notch has been implicated in human cancers and is a putative therapeutic target. However, the regulation of Notch activation in the nucleus remains largely uncharacterized. Therefore, characterizing the detailed mechanisms governing Notch degradation will identify attractive strategies for treating Notch-activated cancers. Here, we report that the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) BREA2 drives breast cancer metastasis by stabilizing the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD1). Moreover, we reveal WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 (WWP2) as an E3 ligase for NICD1 at K1821 and a suppressor of breast cancer metastasis. Mechanistically, BREA2 impairs WWP2-NICD1 complex formation and in turn stabilizes NICD1, leading to Notch signaling activation and lung metastasis. BREA2 loss sensitizes breast cancer cells to inhibition of Notch signaling and suppresses the growth of breast cancer patient-derived xenograft tumors, highlighting its therapeutic potential in breast cancer. Taken together, these results reveal the lncRNA BREA2 as a putative regulator of Notch signaling and an oncogenic player driving breast cancer metastasis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for early prediction of response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely accepted as a primary treatment for inoperable or locally advanced breast cancer before definitive surgery. However, not all advanced breast cancers are sensitive to NAC. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has been considered to assess tumor response to NAC as it can effectively reflect the condition of blood perfusion and lesion size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS to predict early response in different regions of interest in breast tumors under NAC treatment. This prospective study included 82 patients with advanced breast cancer. Parameters of TIC (time-intensive curve) between baseline and after the first cycle of NAC were calculated for the rate of relative change (Δ), including Δpeak, ΔTTP (time to peak), ΔRBV (regional blood volume), ΔRBF (regional blood flow) and ΔMTT (mean transit time). The responders and non-responders were distinguished by the Miller-Payne Grading (MPG) system and parameters from different regions of tumors were compared in these two groups. For ROI 1(the greatest enhancement area in the central region of the tumor), there were significant differences in Δpeak1, ΔRBV1 and ΔRBF1 between responders and non-responders. For ROI 2 (the greatest enhancement area on edge of the tumor), there were significant differences in Δpeak2 and ΔRBF2 between the groups. The Δpeak1 and ΔRBF2 showed good prediction (AUC 0.798-0.820, p ≤ 0.02) after the first cycle of NAC. When the cut-off value was 0.115, the ΔRBF2 had the highest diagnostic accuracy and the maximum NPV. Quantitative TIC parameters could be effectively used to evaluate early response to NAC in advanced breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive breast cancer (PHEDRA): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) plus capecitabine has survival benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. We further assessed addition of pyrotinib to trastuzumab and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study (PHEDRA), treatment-naive women with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four neoadjuvant cycles of oral pyrotinib or placebo (400 mg) once daily, plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/is and ypN0) rate per independent central review. RESULTS: Between Jul 23, 2018, and Jan 8, 2021, 355 patients were randomly assigned, 178 to the pyrotinib group and 177 to the placebo group. The majority of patients completed four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment as planned (92.7% and 97.7% in the pyrotinib and placebo groups, respectively). The tpCR rate was 41.0% (95% CI 34.0 to 48.4) in the pyrotinib group compared with 22.0% (95% CI 16.6 to 28.7) in the placebo group (difference, 19.0% [95% CI 9.5 to 28.4]; one-sided P < 0.0001). The objective response rate per investigator was 91.6% (95% CI 86.6 to 94.8) in the pyrotinib group and 81.9% (95% CI 75.6 to 86.9) in the placebo group after the neoadjuvant treatment, resulting in an increase of 9.7% (95% CI 2.7 to 16.6). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhea (79 [44.4%] in the pyrotinib group and nine [5.1%] in the placebo group), neutropenia (33 [18.5%] and 36 [20.3%]), and decreased white blood cell count (29 [16.3%] and 24 [13.6%]). No deaths were reported during neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint of the study was met. Neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel significantly improved the tpCR rate compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, with manageable toxicity, providing a new option for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03588091.

Recent Advances in the Aging Microenvironment of Breast Cancer.

Aging is one of the risk factors for advanced breast cancer. With the increasing trend toward population aging, it is important to study the effects of aging on breast cancer in depth. Cellular senescence and changes in the aging microenvironment in vivo are the basis for body aging and death. In this review, we focus on the influence of the aging microenvironment on breast cancer. Increased breast extracellular matrix stiffness in the aging breast extracellular matrix can promote the invasion of breast cancer cells. The role of senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs) such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), in breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis is worthy of exploration. Furthermore, the impact of senescent fibroblasts, adipocytes, and endothelial cells on the mammary matrix is discussed in detail. We also list potential targets for senotherapeutics and senescence-inducing agents in the aging microenvironment of breast cancer. In conclusion, this review offers an overview of the influence of the aging microenvironment on breast cancer initiation and progression, with the aim of providing some directions for future research on the aging microenvironment in breast cancer.

Perceived Importance of Breast Cancer Risk Factors: A Survey on 386 Physicians in China.

There are varying definitions of women at high risk of breast cancer across different institutions, and there are reports suggesting that the breast cancer risk assessment tools have not been well integrated into clinical practice. In this study, we tried to investigate the perceived importance of different breast cancer risk factors by physicians in China. A cross-sectional survey involving 386 anonymous physicians was conducted using a 20-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. The Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparisons were used to compare the differences in response. Most of the respondents were either breast surgeons/specialists (n=161; 41.7%) or medical oncologists (n=151; 39.1%), and the results showed that the breast cancer risk factors were not perceived as equally important. The weighting of each risk factor also varied depending on the physician's medical specialty, location of practice, and the number of years of clinical experience.  This study provides a more updated insight into the perceptions of physicians in China toward the breast cancer risk factors, as well as underlines the potential improvements in breast cancer risk assessment strategies that can be done.

Research on correlations of miR-585 expression with progression and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer is a special type of breast cancer, characterized by younger onset age, shorter survival period, higher malignant degree, higher mortality, recurrence and metastasis. Triple-negative breast cancer is more harmful to women's life and health, compared with other types of breast cancer. This paper mainly studied the role of miR-585 in triple-negative breast cancer. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect the expression of miR-585 in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines and tissues. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model analysis were used to investigate the prognostic value of miR-585 in triple-negative breast cancer. CCK-8 and Transwell assays were used to detect cell proliferation, invasion and migration. miR-585 was significantly down-regulated in triple-negative breast cancer cells and tissues. The low expression of miR-585 has been shown to be significantly associated with poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Abnormally low expression of miR-585 can promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Overall, abnormally low expression of miR-585 is associated with prognosis and progression of triple-negative breast cancer. miR-585 may serve as a prognostic biomarker for patients with triple-negative breast cancer and it is expected to be a new method and strategy for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs. trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with pretreated HER2-positive advanced metastatic breast cancer: results from a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II bridging study.

Background: Trastuzumab is the recommended first-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in China, but therapeutic resistance to trastuzumab and other early-line treatments is common and late-line treatment options are limited. Derived from the same murine precursor antibody, margetuximab has enhanced anti-tumor activity compared with trastuzumab and may be an effective late-line treatment. However, data regarding the use of margetuximab in pre-treated Chinese patients are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs. trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients, and to determine whether the results are consistent with the clinical benefit of margetuximab observed in the pivotal global phase III study. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II bridging study, eligible Chinese patients pretreated with ≥2 lines of anti-HER2 therapies were randomized 1:1 by stratified block randomization to margetuximab (15 mg/kg over at least 120 minutes) or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg over at least 30 minutes), each administered intravenously once every 21-day cycle and plus chemotherapy. Disease assessment was conducted once every two treatment cycles (6 weeks ± 7 days). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Between February 4, 2020 and February 23, 2021, 123 patients were randomized to the margetuximab (n=62) and trastuzumab (n=61) arms. Among them, 15 and 7 patients, respectively, were still on study treatment as of data cut-off (September 3, 2021). Overall, 99.2% were female, median age was 53 years old. All patients were pretreated with trastuzumab, and 83.7% and 25.2%, respectively, were pretreated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and pertuzumab. Baseline characteristics were numerically balanced between arms. BICR-assessed median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.1 months in the trastuzumab arm, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-1.12], which met the consistency criterion (HR <0.88) for bridging success. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.0 months in the trastuzumab arm (HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.96). Median OS (mOS) was not yet reached. Both ORR and CBR were greater in the margetuximab arm (25.5% vs. 12.5%; 32.7% vs. 14.3%). Safety results were numerically comparable between the two arms. Anti-HER2 treatment-related infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were more common in the margetuximab arm than in the trastuzumab arm (12.9% vs. 1.7%). All IRRs could be resolved. Conclusions: Margetuximab was effective and well-tolerated in this study, supporting its clinical use in pretreated HER2-positive MBC patients in China. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04262804.