RESUMEN
(1) Background: Vaccination is the most effective intervention to control seasonal influenza morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to determine the influenza vaccination coverage in the Military Health Corps personnel in the 2020−2021 season, as well as the time trend and the possible influence of the pandemic on coverage, in order to study the reasons that led to the non-vaccination of health professionals and to analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs). (2) Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2021. All FAS CMS personnel were included. A self-administered questionnaire was sent by e-mail to the selected personnel. (3) Results: Vaccination coverage in the 2016−2017 season was 15.8% (n = 276), in the 2019−2020 season it was 17.41% (n = 424), and in the 2020−2021 season it was 24.22% (n = 590). The percentage of vaccinated men was higher than the percentage of women. In 2019 and 2020 the most vaccinated group was 31−40 years old. Lieutenants had the highest vaccination uptake in 2019 and 2020. The personnel with the highest uptake of vaccines were those in the specialty of nursing in each of 2016, 2019 and 2020, with >30 years of time worked in 2016. In terms of factors leading to refusal of vaccination, the most reported was "not considered a risk group" (23.0%), and the least reported was "avoidance of vaccine administration" (2.2%). Eighty individuals presented adverse reactions after vaccine administration (9.6%). (4) Conclusions: The rate of influenza vaccination among healthcare professionals was lower during the 2020 season compared to the previous season, but was expected to increase in the upcoming 2021 season.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the compliance with preventive measures against malaria of the personnel treated in the Spanish Defence International Vaccination Centre (CVI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from November to December 2017. The population was 534 individuals. All were treated in CVI, prior to their deployment on endemic areas of malaria, with prevention measures type C and D. A questionnaire of 23 items was elaborated. RESULTS: The percentage of response to the questionnaire was 36.9% (n=194), 100% were male. Air conditioner was the most used protection measure 93.8% (IC 95% 90.4-97.2). Only 35.5% (95% CI: 28.8-42.2) of them, showed good adherence to medication. The factors that influenced in the adherence were the country and the length of deployment. It was not established a direct relationship between the occurrence of adverse reactions and low adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The general protection measures against malaria were met in a high percentage, whilst the use of chemoprophylaxis was very low. These epidemiological data allowed us to know the validity of the health education that is provided in the traveller's care consultation. It also allowed being aware of the possibilities of infection and import of malaria by personnel of the Spanish Armed Forces. The traveller's office will reinforce the importance of taking the adequate chemoprophylaxis trough conferences and informative diptychs
OBJETIVO: Este estudio evaluó el cumplimiento de las medidas preventivas contra la malaria por parte del personal tratado en el Centro de Vacunación Internacional de la Defensa. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de noviembre a diciembre de 2017. La población era de 534 individuos. Todos fueron tratados en el Centro de Vacunación Internacional, antes de su despliegue en áreas endémicas de malaria, en las que según indicación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud se recomendaba el uso de medidas de prevención tipo C y D. Se elaboró un cuestionario de 23 ítems. RESULTADOS: El porcentaje de respuesta al cuestionario fue del 36,9% (n = 194), el 100% eran hombres. El aire acondicionado fue la medida de protección más utilizada 93,8% (IC 95% 90,4-97,2). Solo el 35,5% (IC 95%: 28,8-42,2) de ellos, mostraron buena adherencia a la medicación. Los factores que influyeron en la adhesión fueron el país y la duración del despliegue. No se estableció una relación directa entre la aparición de reacciones adversas y la baja adherencia al tratamiento. CONCLUSIONES: Las medidas generales de protección contra la malaria se cumplieron en un porcentaje elevado, mientras que el uso de quimioprofilaxis fue bajo. Estos datos epidemiológicos nos permitieron conocer la validez de la educación sanitaria que se brinda en la consulta de atención al viajero. También permitió conocer las posibilidades de infección e importación de malaria por parte del personal de las Fuerzas Armadas Españolas. La oficina del viajero reforzará la importancia de una quimioprofilaxis adecuada a través de conferencias y dípticos informativos
