Pain control is comparable between opioid versus non-opioid management after otolaryngology procedures.

Objective: The current study aims to measure patient-reported satisfaction with pain control using opioid and non-opioid medications after undergoing the following otolaryngology procedures: parathyroidectomy, thyroid lobectomy, total thyroidectomy, and bilateral tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center that included a telephone questionnaire and chart review. Opioid prescriptions, usage, and patient-reported pain outcomes were recorded. Bivariate analyses were used to compare opioid and non-opioid users. Results: Of the 107 total patients undergoing otolaryngology procedures included in the study, 49 (45.8%) used an opioid for pain management postoperatively and 58 (54.2%) did not. Among the 81 patients who underwent endocrine procedures (parathyroidectomy, total thyroidectomy/lobectomy), most patients reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with pain control whether they used opioids (n = 27/30, 90%) or not (n = 50/51, 98%). Of the 26 patients who underwent bilateral tonsillectomy, 19 (73%) were prescribed opioids and among these, most (n = 17/19, 89%) reported they were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with pain control. In the non-opioid usage group, all patients (n = 7/7, 100%) reported they were "satisfied" with pain control. There was no statistically significant difference in patient-reported satisfaction with pain control between opioid and non-opioid users for any of the procedures listed. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that patients who did not use opioids have a similar level of satisfaction with pain control compared to those using opioids after thyroid, parathyroid and tonsillectomy surgeries. Considering the magnitude of the opioid crisis, providers should reassess the need for opioid prescriptions following certain ENT procedures. Level of Evidence: IV.

Opioid Use and Associated Patient Satisfaction With Pain Control After Endoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient reported measures in patients undergoing endourologic procedures and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to demonstrate the efficacy of non-opioid postoperative pain management strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study performed at an academic medical center included a patient telephone questionnaire and chart review. Opioid prescriptions, opioid use, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. Bivariate analyses were used to compare patients who did and did not use opioids in the RARP cohort while overall trends were reported for the endourologic procedures. RESULTS: Of the 68 patients undergoing endoscopic intervention, 14 (21%) were prescribed an opioid and 6 (9%) reported any opioid use. 58 (85%) reported their pain was very well or well controlled while 9 reported their pain was poorly controlled. 59 (87%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their pain control. Fifty-three (93%) of the 57 patients undergoing RARP received an opioid prescription and only 23 reported any opioid use. All but 1 patient reported that their pain was well or very well controlled and almost all (54) of the patients were satisfied with their level of pain control. 36 (63%) reported their pain was less than expected while only 7 (12%) reported it was more than expected. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing endourologic procedures do not use postoperative opioids and report favorable outcomes regarding their pain control. Similarly, after RARP, most patients do not use opioids even when they are prescribed and are satisfied with their pain control.

Patients' Experience With Opioid Pain Medication After Discharge From Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the number of prescription opioids has been a leading strategy in combating the opioid epidemic. In Vermont, statewide and institutional policies have affected prescribing practices, resulting in a 40% decrease in postoperative opioid prescribing. The optimal approach to postoperative opioid prescribing remains unknown. In this study, we describe patients' experience with pain control 1 wk after discharge from surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed patients' experience using a telephone questionnaire, 1-wk after discharge after undergoing common surgical procedures between 2017 and 2019 at an academic medical center (n = 1027). Scaled responses regarding pain control, opioids prescribed, and opioids used (response rate 96%) were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach; open-ended patient responses to questions regarding whether the number of opioids prescribed was "correct" were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: One week after discharge, 96% of patients reported that their pain was well controlled. When asked whether they received the correct number of opioid pills postoperatively, qualitative analysis of patient responses yielded the following six themes: (1) I had more than I needed, but not more than I wanted; (2) Rationed medication; (3) Medication was not effective; (4) Caution regarding risks of opioids; (5) Awareness of the public health concerns; and (6) Used opioids from a prior prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported pain control after common surgical procedures was excellent. However, patients are supportive of receiving more pain medications than they actually use, and they fear that further restrictions may prevent them or others from managing pain adequately. Understanding the patients' perspective is important for surgical education and improving discharge protocols.

Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether detection rates of specific benign and malignant diagnoses differ for breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed observational data from the Vermont Breast Cancer Surveillance System, including 86,349 DBT screening examinations and 97,378 FFDM screening examinations performed at eight radiology facilities in Vermont that adopted DBT screening during 2012-2016. We determined the most severe diagnosis made within 6 months after positive screening examinations. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to compare detection rates for specific diagnoses on DBT versus FFDM. RESULTS: Compared with FFDM, DBT had a lower recall rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85) but comparable biopsy rate (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.17), benign biopsy rate (OR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.29), and cancer detection rate (OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.14). Among benign diagnoses, DBT and FFDM had comparable detection rates for nonproliferative lesions (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.92-1.53), fibroepithelial proliferations (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.81), proliferative lesions without atypia (OR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.42), atypical lesions (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.43-1.38), and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.53-1.61). Among malignant diagnoses, DBT and FFDM had comparable detection rates for ductal carcinoma in situ (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70-1.57) and invasive breast cancer (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74-1.13), with no statistically significant differences in detection of invasive ductal carcinoma (OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66-1.06), invasive lobular carcinoma (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.59-2.07), or invasive mixed ductal-lobular carcinoma (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.65-3.39). CONCLUSION: Compared with FFDM, breast cancer screening with DBT has a lower recall rate while detecting a similar distribution of benign and malignant diagnoses.

Postoperative opioid prescribing patterns and use after vascular surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess postoperative opioid prescribing patterns, usage, and pain control after common vascular surgery procedures in order to develop patient centered best-practice guidelines. We performed a prospective review of opioid prescribing after seven common vascular surgeries at a rural, academic medical center from December 2016 to July 2017. A standardized telephone questionnaire was prospectively administered to patients ( n = 110) about opioid use and pain management perceptions. For comparison we retrospectively assessed opioid prescribing patterns ( n = 939) from July 2014 to June 2016 normalized into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Prescribers were surveyed regarding opioid prescription attitudes, perceptions, and practices. Opioids were prescribed for 78% of procedures, and 70% of patients reported using opioid analgesia. In the prospective group, the median MMEs prescribed were: VEIN (31, n = 16), CEA (40, n = 14), DIAL (60, n = 17), EVAR (108, n = 8), INFRA (160, n = 16), FEM TEA (200, n = 11), and OA (273, n = 4). The median proportion of opioids used by patients across all procedures was only 30% of the amount prescribed across all procedures (range 14-64%). Patients rated the opioid prescribed as appropriate (59%), insufficient (16%), and overprescribed (25%), and pain as very well controlled (47%), well controlled (47%), poorly controlled (4%), and very poorly controlled (2%). In conclusion, we observed significant variability in opioid prescribing after vascular procedures. The overall opioid use was substantially lower than the amount prescribed. These data enabled us to develop guidelines for opioid prescribing practice for our patients.

Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing and Use after Common Surgical Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The number of deaths from prescription opioids in the US continues to increase and remains a major public health concern. Opioid-related deaths parallel prescribing trends, and postoperative opioids are a significant source of opioids in the community. Our objective was to identify opioid prescribing and use patterns after surgery to inform evidence-based practices. STUDY DESIGN: Data from a 340-bed academic medical institution and its affiliated outpatient surgical facility included retrospective medical record data and prospective telephone questionnaire and medical record data. Retrospective data included patients discharged after 1 of 19 procedure types, from July 2015 to June 2016 (n = 10,112). Prospective data included a consecutive sample of general and orthopaedic surgery and urology patients undergoing 1 of 13 procedures, from July 2016 to February 2017 (n = 539). Primary outcomes were the quantity of opioid prescribed and used in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and the proportion of patients receiving instructions on disposal and nonopioid strategies. RESULTS: In the retrospective dataset, 76% of patients received an opioid after surgery, and 87% of prescriptions were prescribed by residents or advanced practice providers. Median prescription size ranged from 0 to 503 MME, with wide interquartile ranges (IQR) for most procedures. In the prospective dataset, there were 359 participants (67% participation rate). Of these, 92% of patients received an opioid and the median proportion used was 27%, or 24 MME (IQR 0 to 96). Only 18% of patients received disposal instructions, while 84% of all patients received instructions on nonopioid strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Median opioid use after surgery was 27% of the total prescribed, and only 18% of patients reported receiving disposal instructions. Significant variability in opioid prescribing and use after surgery warrants investigation into contributing factors.