Degradation of glycosylinositol phosphoceramide during plant tissue homogenization.

A convenient method for the determination of plant sphingolipids (glycosylinositol phosphoceramide, GIPC; glucosylceramide, GluCer; phytoceramide 1-phosphate, PC1P and phytoceramide, PCer) was developed. This method includes the extraction of lipids using 1-butanol, alkali hydrolysis with methylamine and separation by TLC. The amounts of sphingolipids in the sample were determined based on the relative intensities of standard sphingolipids visualized by primulin/UV on TLC. Using this method, we found that almost all GIPCs were degraded in response to tissue homogenization in cruciferous plants (cabbage, broccoli and Arabidopsis thaliana). The decrease in GIPCs was compensated for by increases in PC1P and PCer, indicating that GIPC was degraded by hydrolysis at the D and C positions of GIPC, respectively. In carrot roots and leaves, most of GIPC degradation was compensated for by an increase in PCer. In rice roots, the decrease in GIPCs was not fully explained by the increases in PC1P and PCer, indicating that enzymes other than phospholipase C and D activities operated. As the visualization of lipids on TLC is useful for detecting the appearance or disappearance of lipids, this method will be available for the characterization of metabolism of sphingolipids in plants.

Static light scattering study of complex formation between protein and neutral water-soluble polymer.

Complex formation of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPA) having a weight-average molecular weight of 1,720,000g/mol with human serum albumin (HSA), ovalbumin (OVA) and lysozyme (LYZ) was studied in an aqueous medium containing 0.01 M NaCl and adjusted to pH 3. The polymer-protein mixtures at different molar ratios (r(m)) were examined by static light scattering (SLS). The analysis of SLS data using our own approach [Kokufuta et al., Langmuir 15 (1999) 940; Biomacromolecules 4 (2003) 728] showed that the molecular weight of each resulting complex is smaller than that of the interpolymer complex composed of two polymer chains plus one protein. This indicates the formation of an intrapolymer complex in all the polymer-protein systems studied. Thus, at each r(m) we calculated the number of bound proteins per polymer, the value of which was OVA>HSA>LYZ in order. These results were compared with the hydropathy profiles of each protein which are a good tool for obtaining an information about distribution of hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments in a protein. It has become apparent that the hydrophobic interaction between polymer and protein plays an important role in the intrapolymer complex formation.