Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Arrhythm ; 40(3): 552-559, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939776

RESUMEN

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) sometimes recurs even after anatomical slow pathway (SP) ablation targeting the rightward inferior extension (RIE). This multicenter study aimed to determine the reasons for AVNRT recurrence. Methods and Results: Forty-six patients were treated successfully for recurrent AVNRT. Initial treatment was for 38 slow-fast AVNRTs, 3 fast-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-fast and fast-slow AVNRTs, and 1 noninducible AVNRT. All initial treatments were of RF application to the RIE; SP elimination was achieved in 11, dual AVN physiology was seen in 29, and AVNRT remained inducible in 5. The recurrent AVNRTs included 34 slow-fast AVNRTs, 6 fast-slow AVNRTs, 3 slow-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-fast and fast-slow AVNRTs, and 1 slow-fast and slow-slow AVNRTs. Successful ablation site was within the RIE in 39 and left inferior extension in 7. In 30 of 39, the successful RIE site was in the same area or higher than that of the initial procedure. Conclusion: For a high majority (around 85%) of patients in whom AVNRT recurs after initial ablation success, the site of a second successful procedure will be within the RIE even though the RIE was originally targeted. Furthermore, a high majority (around 86%) of sites of successful ablation will be higher than those originally targeted.

3.
J Arrhythm ; 40(3): 423-433, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939793

RESUMEN

Background: Despite the positive impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) on prognosis, their implantation is often withheld especially in Japanese heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who have not experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for uncertain reasons. Recent advancements in heart failure (HF) medications have significantly improved the prognosis for HFrEF. Given this context, a critical reassessment of the treatment and prognosis of ICDs and WCDs is essential, as it has the potential to reshape awareness and treatment strategies for these patients. Methods: We are initiating a prospective multicenter observational study for HFrEF patients eligible for ICD in primary and secondary prevention, and WCD, regardless of device use, including all consenting patients. Study subjects are to be enrolled from 31 participant hospitals located throughout Japan from April 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, and each will be followed up for 1 year or more. The planned sample size is 651 cases. The primary endpoint is the rate of cardiac implantable electronic device implementation. Other endpoints include the incidence of VT/VF and sudden death, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization, other events. We will collect clinical background information plus each patient's symptoms, Clinical Frailty Scale score, laboratory test results, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters, and serial changes will also be secondary endpoints. Results: Not applicable. Conclusion: This study offers invaluable insights into understanding the role of ICD/WCD in Japanese HF patients in the new era of HF medication.

4.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel diamond-embedded catheter enables precise temperature-controlled ablation. However, the effects of contact angle on lesion formation of this catheter are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion formation using the temperature-controlled ablation catheter embedded with diamond at different angles in a porcine experimental model. METHODS: Freshly sacrificed porcine hearts were used. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed at 50 W for 15 seconds at an upper temperature setting of 60°C. The contact force (5g, 10g, 30g) and catheter contact angles (30°, 45°, 90°) were changed in each set (n = 13 each). Surface width, maximum lesion width, lesion depth, surface area, distance from the distal edge to the widest area, and impedance drop were evaluated. RESULTS: Surface width and maximum lesion width were longer at 30° than at 90° (P <.05). There were no significant differences in the lesion depth by catheter angle except at 30g. Surface area was larger at 30° than at 90° (P <.05). Distance from the distal edge to the widest area was longer at 30° than at 90° (P <.05). There were no significant differences in impedance drop according to catheter angle. CONCLUSION: With diamond-embedded temperature-controlled ablation catheters, lesion width increased at a shallower contact angle, whereas lesion depth did not. Surface area also increased at a shallower contact angle. This catheter created a large ablation lesion on the proximal side of the catheter, which looked like a "honey pot."

5.
J Arrhythm ; 40(2): 297-305, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38586850

RESUMEN

Background: The prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in patients with type B acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic impact of AF and OAC therapy in patients with type B AAD. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with AAD were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients with type B AAD were selected from the study population and divided into three groups: AF(+)/OAC(+), AF(+)/OAC(-), and AF(-)/OAC(-). The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, progressive aortic events, cerebral infarction, and organ malperfusion. Results: In total, 139 patients diagnosed with type B AAD were analyzed. AF was observed in 27 patients (19%). Among them, 13 patients (9%) received OAC therapy for AF. MACCE occurred in 32 patients (23%) during the observation period: all-cause death in four patients, progressive aortic events in 24 patients, cerebral infarction events in two patients, and malperfusion events in two patients. The incidence of MACCE was higher in the AF(+)/OAC(+) group than in the AF(+)/OAC(-) group (hazard ratio[HR]: 3.875; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.153-17.496). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE between the AF(+)/OAC(-) and AF(-)/OAC(-) groups (HR: 1.001, 95% CI: 0.509-1.802). Conclusion: Among patients with type B AAD, the use of OAC for AF was associated with a higher risk of MACCE.

6.
J Arrhythm ; 40(1): 131-142, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333409

RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to establish a systematic method for diagnosing atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway (cNVP). Methods: We analyzed 13 cases of AVNRT with a bystander cNVP, 11 connected to the slow pathway (cNVP-SP) and two to the fast pathway (cNVP-FP), along with two cases of cNVP-related orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT). Results: The diagnostic process was summarized in three steps. Step 1 was identification of the presence of an accessory pathway by resetting the tachycardia with delay (n = 9) and termination without atrial capture (n = 4) immediately after delivery of a His-refractory premature ventricular contraction (PVC). Step 2 was exclusion of ORT by atrio-His block during the tachycardia (n = 4), disappearance of the reset phenomenon after the early PVC (n = 7), or dissociation of His from the tachycardia during ventricular overdrive pacing (n = 1). Moreover, tachycardia reset/termination without the atrial capture (n = 2/2) 1 cycle after the His-refractory PVC was specifically diagnostic. Exceptionally, the disappearance of the reset phenomenon was also observed in the two cNVP-ORTs. Step 3 was verification of the AVN as the cNVP insertion site, evidenced by an atrial reset/block preceding the His reset/block in fast-slow AVNRT with a cNVP-SP and slow-fast AVNRT with a cNVP-FP or His reset preceding the atrial reset in slow-fast AVNRT with a cNVP-SP. Conclusion: AVNRT with a bystander cNVP can be diagnosed in the three steps with few exceptions. Notably, tachycardia reset/termination without atrial capture one cycle after delivery of a His-refractory PVC is specifically diagnostic.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA