Double-decker cage reduces mount frequency and ejaculation latency, resulting in reduced weight loss in male rats after mating behavior.

Rats were the first mammals to be domesticated for scientific research, and abundant physiological data are available on them. Rats are expected to continue to play an important role as experimental animals, especially with advancements such as CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Environmental enrichment aims to promote species-specific behaviors and psychological well-being. In the present study, we designed a double-decker (DD) cage, which utilizes two stacked plastic cages for rat enrichment, and investigated the influence of housing in the DD cage on rat mating behavior. The results indicated that mount frequency, total mount counts, and total ejaculation latency were significantly lower in the DD cages than in the single-decker (SD) cages. Notably, in the DD cages, the body weight loss of male rats after mating behavior was lower than that observed in the SD cage. Water consumption per day during mating behavior was also significantly lower in the DD cages, although no significant differences were observed in daily food intake during mating behavior. In addition, reproductive performance, including pregnancy rate and birth rate, did not change in the DD cages. In summary, our study demonstrated that DD cages reduce mount frequency and ejaculation latency during rat mating, resulting in decreased water consumption and weight loss in male rats. Therefore, housing in DD cages may serve as a beneficial enrichment for rats.

Invalidity of JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score in Omicron variant of COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia prediction score can be adapted for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia due to Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariants. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 547 patients with community-acquired COVID-19 pneumonia. Of the COVID-19 pneumonia patients, 198 cases were the Omicron BA.1 subvariant, 127 cases were the Omicron BA.2 subvariant, and 222 cases were the Omicron BA.5 subvariant. Patients with extremely severe pneumonia were excluded and finally 524 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Rates of conformity for the six predictors were identical among the three Omicron groups, and high rates of conformity were observed in the following predictors: adventitious sounds; etiological agent; and a peripheral WBC count. The sensitivities of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia based on four or more predictors were 49.0% in the BA.1 subvariant group, 58.1% in the BA.2 subvariant group, and 51.0% in the BA.5 subvariant group. The diagnostic sensitivities for Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariant groups were 96.6%, 100%, and 96.4% for non-elderly (aged <60 years) patients and 28.4%, 29.7%, and 34.2% for elderly (aged ≥60 years) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Omicron variant of COVID-19, the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score is a useful tool for distinguishing between COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia only in patients aged <60 years.

Functional decline at 1 year in hospitalized elderly pneumonia with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Comparison with the ancestral strain and Alpha variant.

In the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron period, the pattern of pneumonia changed from primarily viral pneumonia to pneumonia mixed with bacteria in the elderly. We investigated functional outcomes at 1 year after hospital discharge in patients with primary Omicron pneumonia and pneumonia mixed with bacteria, mainly aspiration pneumonia. Functional decline rates calculated using the Barthel Index at 1 year after hospital discharge were significantly higher in the pneumonia mixed with bacteria group than the primary viral pneumonia group (42.6% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.0001). It is necessary to consider early rehabilitation and treatment in elderly patients even when the predominant strain is the Omicron variant.

Is the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score useful in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia under nursing or healthcare settings?

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 causes frequent outbreaks in elderly care facilities that meet the criteria for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP). We evaluated whether the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia prediction score could be adapted to the diagnosis of nursing and healthcare acquired COVID-19 (NHA-COVID-19) with pneumonia. METHODS: We analyzed 516 pneumonia patients with NHA-COVID-19 and compared them with 1505 pneumonia patients with community-associated COVID-19 (CA-COVID-19). NHA-COVID-19 patients were divided into six groups; 80 cases had the ancestral strain, 76 cases had the Alfa variant, 30 cases had the Delta variant, 120 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.1, 53 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.2, and 157 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.5. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with NHA-COVID-19 based on four or more predictors were 22.8 % in the ancestral strain group, 32.0 % in the Alfa variant group, 34.5 % in the Delta variant group, 23.1 % in the BA.1 subvariant group, 32.7 % in the BA.2 subvariant group, and 30.4 % in the BA.5 subvariant group. The diagnostic sensitivity for the presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia was significantly lower for NHA-COVID-19 than for CA-COVID-19 (28.2 % vs 64.1 %, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our present study demonstrated that the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score is not a useful tool in elderly patients even if there is a lot of atypical pneumonia in the NHCAP group. The caution is necessary that JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score was not fully applied to prediction for NHA-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND: There were many differences in the clinical characteristics between nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain, Alpha variant and Delta variant. With the replacement of the Delta variant by the Omicron variant, the Omicron variant showed decreased infectivity to lung and was less pathogenic. We investigated the clinical differences between NHCAP and CAP due to the Omicron variant. METHODS: We analyzed 516 NHCAP and 547 CAP patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Of 516 patients with COVID-19 NHCAP, 330 cases were the Omicron variant (120 cases were BA.1, 53 cases were BA.2, and 157 cases were BA.5 subvariants) and 186 cases were non-Omicron variants. RESULTS: The median age, frequency of comorbid illness, rates of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality rate were significantly higher in Omicron patients with NHCAP than in those with CAP. Rates of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in NHCAP patients with non-Omicron variants compared with those in the Omicron variant group. No clinical differences were observed in patients with NHCAP among the Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariant groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supported that the NHCAP category is necessary not only for bacterial pneumonia but also viral pneumonia. It is necessary to consider prevention and treatment strategies depending on the presence or absence of applicable criteria for NHCAP.

Clinical impact of proteinuria on renal function and treatment outcomes in patients with radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib.

Proteinuria has been described as a major on-target adverse event of lenvatinib, although its long-term impact on renal function and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess renal function and prognosis in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) receiving lenvatinib. Overall, 70 patients with RR-DTC treated with lenvatinib were enrolled. When proteinuria was observed, the dose and schedule of lenvatinib were adjusted to achieve a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 3.5 g/gCre according to the study protocols of recent pivotal trials. In total, 50 (71%) and 25 (36%) patients presented with any-grade and grade 3 proteinuria, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age [>65; odds ratio (OR) 8.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-39.00, p < 0.01], history of diabetes mellitus (OR 7.79, 95% CI 1.31-46.20, p = 0.02), and hypertension (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.22-13.60, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with the development of grade 3 proteinuria. Overall, the median estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) gradually decreased every 3 months during treatment. However, no significant deterioration in eGFR was observed in patients with grade 3 proteinuria compared with patients with grades 0-2 proteinuria until 48 months. Patients who developed proteinuria had better survival outcomes than those without proteinuria. In conclusion, the proteinuria grade was not significantly associated with decreased eGFR under UPCR monitoring in our study. Therefore, lenvatinib can carefully be continued targeting UPCR of less than 3.5 g/gCre.

Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus S-1 for Advanced Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) therapy is superior to docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with resectable advanced ESCC at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 underwent either neoadjuvant DCF therapy or DCS therapy, followed by radical esophagectomy. Prior to August 2014, we usually used neoadjuvant DCF therapy; we then completely transitioned to using neoadjuvant DCS therapy. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients received one of these triplet regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy: DCF therapy to 67 patients and DCS therapy to 77 patients. After propensity score matching, 55 patients in each group were selected as matched cohorts. There was no significant difference between the groups in complete response (DCF = 7.3%, DCS = 9.1%) or in partial response (DCF = 45.4%, DCS = 52.7%). The pathological response rate was 23.8% for grade 2 and 18.2% for grade 3 in the DCF group, compared with 30.9% and 14.5% in the DCS group. Independent predictive factors for recurrence-free survival were poor clinical response and pathological response ≤1b. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were poor clinical response, anastomotic leakage, and pathological response ≤1b. Duration of hospital stays in the DCS group was significantly shorter than those of the DCF group (6.0 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001). Expenses of drug and hospitalization for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the DCS group were also significantly lower than those of the DCF group (265.7 vs. 550.3 USD, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable advanced ESCC did not result in significantly higher clinical and pathological response than neoadjuvant DCF therapy. However, neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable ESCC required comparatively shorter hospital stays and incurred lower costs, making it an attractive therapeutic option.

Comparison of pneumonia severity scores for COVID-19 patients with the Omicron variant.

INTRODUCTION: We demonstrated that there was a significant relationship between the severity measured using the A-DROP scoring system and the mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the ancestral strain, Alpha variant, and Delta variant. We investigated the usefulness of the A-DROP scoring system in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant CAP and compared it with severity scores, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 score. METHODS: We analyzed a total of 547 patients with COVID-19 CAP Omicron variant; 198 cases were the BA.1 subvariant, 127 cases were the BA.2 subvariant, and 222 cases were the BA.5 subvariant, respectively. RESULTS: The mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 CAP among the three Omicron subvariants were identical in each pneumonia severity group. The mortality rate in patients with the Omicron variant was 0 % in patients classified with mild disease, 0.6 % in those with moderate disease, 10.4 % in those with severe disease, and 34.8 % in those with extremely severe disease. The mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 CAP increased depending on the severity classified according to the A-DROP system in each of the Omicron subvariants (Cochran-Armitage trend test; p < 0.001). The values of the area under the curve in Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality was 0.881, 0.879, and 0.863 for A-DROP, PSI, and CURB-65, respectively. There were no significant differences in the predictive ability of each pneumonia severity score. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that the A-DROP scoring system is useful for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 CAP.

Factors associated with lenvatinib adherence in thyroid cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is an oral anticancer medication used to treat radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate lenvatinib adherence by patients and to identify factors associated with decreased lenvatinib adherence. METHODS: Among 153 patients who started treatment with lenvatinib for unresectable thyroid cancer or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma between May 1, 2015 and August 31 2021 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 102 were eligible for this study (55 thyroid cancer, 47 hepatocellular carcinoma). The lenvatinib adherence rate in a treatment cycle was defined as the number of times a patient took lenvatinib in a 28-day cycle divided by the prescribed 28 doses. The rate was determined by pill counting and self-reporting at the pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. Reasons for non-adherence were established by interview and analyzed. RESULTS: The median adherence rate of lenvatinib in the first cycle was 90.1% (n = 55) in thyroid cancer and 94.9% (n = 47) in hepatocellular carcinoma. In thyroid cancer, there were 255 incidents of lenvatinib non-adherence. Non-adherence was mainly associated with bleeding events (18.6%), followed by hand-foot skin reactions (10.6%). In hepatocellular carcinoma, there were 97 incidents of non-adherence. Hypertension accounted for 20.6%, followed by hoarseness (18.6%) and diarrhea (17.5%). CONCLUSION: The adherence rate for lenvatinib in Japanese patients with thyroid and hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world clinical practice was more than 90% in this study. Hypertension was a major reason for non-adherence, followed by hand-foot skin reactions and diarrhea.

Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The stomach is the most common organ which is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It is controversial which is better narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction to prevent anastomotic leakage. METHODS: From August 2022 to March 2023, we started a prospective cohort study of whole stomach reconstruction after esophagectomy. Until then (from January 2018 to July 2022), narrow gastric tube reconstruction was performed as a standard reconstruction. RESULTS: Narrow gastric tube reconstruction and whole stomach reconstruction were performed in 183 patients and 20 patients, respectively. The patient's characteristics were not significantly different between the narrow gastric tube group and the whole stomach group. In particular, for all patients in the whole stomach reconstruction group, retrosternal route and esophagogastrostomy by hand sewn were applied. There were no occurrences of AL through the continuous 20 cases in the whole stomach group, otherwise 42 (22.9%) patients in the narrow gastric group (P = 0.016). Postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the whole stomach group than in the narrow gastric group (21 days vs. 28 days, P < .001). Blood perfusions were evaluated by indocyanine green for all cases, which had very good blood perfusion in all cases. Additionally, quantitative blood perfusion was examined by SPY-QP (Stryker, USA) for one case. Even the edge of the fornix showed more than 90% blood perfusion levels when the antrum was fixed as the reference point. CONCLUSION: Whole stomach reconstruction with excellent blood perfusion is considered to be safe and has the possibility to prevent from occurring AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients.

Comparison of Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin versus Observation in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

INTRODUCTION: Although systemic therapy, including multi-kinase inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy, is an option for recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck (HNACC), it is not proven whether these therapies can prolong overall survival (OS). The present study investigated the impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on survival outcomes compared with observation without chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic HNACC. We compared the survival outcomes, including survival time from recurrence/metastasis (OS) patients who received systemic chemotherapy with paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6) (TC) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle and observation alone. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify patients who can get benefit from TC. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (32 in TC and 43 in observation) were analyzed. There was no difference in median OS between TC and observation (52.2 months vs. 44.0 months, hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.32-1.30, p = 0.21). Landmark analysis to reduce immortal bias also showed no difference between TC and observation in terms of OS. Subgroup analysis showed nonsignificant trends toward longer OS in asymptomatic patients with pulmonary metastasis and without bone metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: In our non-randomized comparison, patients who underwent TC did not show prolonged survival time from recurrence and/or metastasis diagnosis compared with observation alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNACC. Although systemic chemotherapy is a possible option for metastatic/recurrent HNACC, initial observation might be a valid strategy for asymptomatic patients without extrapulmonary diseases. Further research is warranted to identify the optimal patients and therapeutic regimens to prolong OS in HNACC.

Real-world clinical profile, treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes for thyroid cancer in Japan.

Aim: To provide a real-world snapshot of the clinical profile, management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for advanced medullary and papillary thyroid cancer prior to the availability of rearranged during transfection (RET) inhibitors in Japan. Materials & methods: Physicians completed patient-record forms for eligible patients seen during routine clinical practice. Physicians were also surveyed about their routine practice and patients were asked to provide PRO data. Results: RET testing patterns varied by hospital type; no therapeutic relevance was a commonly cited reason to not carry out testing. Multikinase inhibitors were the main systemic therapies prescribed, although timing to start multikinase inhibitors varied; adverse events were reported as challenges. PROs revealed high disease/treatment burden. Conclusion: More effective and less toxic systemic treatment targeting genomic alterations is needed to improve long-term outcomes of thyroid cancer.

This survey, conducted in Japan in 2020, included doctors who treat thyroid cancer and their patients. It is called a real-world survey because it provides information such as the types of tests and treatments used for thyroid cancer management in everyday clinical practice. The survey focused on two types of thyroid cancer: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), a common type, and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), an uncommon type. About 10­20% of people with PTC and most people with MTC have alterations in a gene called RET, which caused the cancer. Laboratory tests can identify these gene alterations, fusions (joining the parts of two different genes) or mutations (changes to a gene's DNA sequence) and results can help guide treatment decisions. The survey showed that testing for RET gene alterations was less than optimal and varied by the type of hospital/center. Common reasons provided by doctors for not testing for RET alterations were, "no therapeutic relevance for patient management" and "specific targeted therapies not available". However, the survey was conducted before the availability in Japan of the treatment selpercatinib, which selectively targets/inhibits tumors with RET alterations. Most patients in the survey, including those with RET alterations, received treatment with a type of inhibitor called multikinase inhibitors, as per available guidelines. Doctors considered side effects due to inhibition of multiple targets by multikinase inhibitors to be among areas for improvement needed. People with PTC and MTC also reported substantial burdens (i.e., negative impact on their lives) from the disease/treatment. The researchers concluded that barriers to RET testing need to be overcome, and more effective and less toxic treatments targeting gene alterations are needed to improve long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic reconstruction in McKeown esophagectomy is a risk factor for postoperative diaphragmatic hernia.

Diaphragmatic hernia is a very rare but high-risk complication after esophagectomy. Although there are many studies on the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy procedure for diaphragmatic hernia, there are fewer studies on the McKeown procedure. The present study aimed to estimate the incidence of diaphragmatic hernia after esophagectomy, describing its presentation and management with the McKeown procedure. We retrospectively evaluated the 622 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy between January 2002 and December 2020 at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for diaphragmatic hernia. Emergency surgery for postoperative diaphragmatic hernia was performed in nine of 622 patients (1.45%). Of these nine patients, one developed prolapse of the small intestine into the mediastinum (11.1%). The other eight patients underwent posterior mediastinal route reconstructions (88.9%), one of whom developed prolapse of the gastric conduit, and seven of whom developed transverse colon via the diaphragmatic hiatus. Laparoscopic surgery was identified in multivariate analysis as the only independent risk factor for diaphragmatic hernia (odd's ratio [OR] = 9.802, p = 0.034). In all seven cases of transverse colon prolapse into the thoracic cavity, the prolapsed organ had herniated from the left anterior part of gastric conduit. Laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer is a risk factor for diaphragmatic hernia. The left anterior surface of gastric conduit and diaphragmatic hiatus should be fixed firmly without compromising blood flow to the gastric conduit.

Clinical Efficacy of the Neutralizing Antibody Therapy Sotrovimab in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 Subvariant Infections.

Sotrovimab, an antibody active against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that neutralizes antibodies, reduced the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death in studies conducted before the emergence of the Omicron variant. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sotrovimab in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariant infections using a propensity score matching method. The propensity score-matched cohort study population was derived from patients who received sotrovimab. We derived a comparator group from an age- and sex-matched population who were recuperating in a medical facility after COVID-19 infection or from elderly person entrance facilities during the same period who were eligible for but did not receive sotrovimab treatment. In total, 642 patients in the BA.1 subvariant group and 202 in the BA.2 subvariant group and matched individuals were analyzed. The outcome was the requirement for oxygen therapy. In the treatment group, 26 patients with the BA.1 subvariant and 8 patients with the BA.2 subvariant received oxygen therapy. The administration of oxygen therapy was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (BA.1 subvariant group, 4.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.0008; BA.2 subvariant group, 4.0% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.0296). All these patients were admitted to our hospitals and received additional therapy and then recovered. No deaths were observed in either group. Our results demonstrate that the sotrovimab antibody treatment may be associated with a reduction in the requirement for oxygen therapy among high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in older adult patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with tri-weekly cisplatin.

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) in the definitive setting. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a screening tool to predict the risk of morbidity and mortality in the older adult. Nutritional management is key during CCRT but the association between prognosis and initial nutritional status in older adults with LAHNC undergoing CCRT remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥65 years old with LAHNC who received definitive CCRT with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2, every three weeks, three times) between 2012 and 2018 were included. Patients without completion of radiotherapy were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the GNRI (≦98 or > 98). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to identify prognostic factors. GNRI, sex, T and N categories were prespecified as variables for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The median age of 111 patients (88 male, 79%) was 69 years (interquartile range: 67-71), among which 23 patients had low GNRI (20 male, 87%) and 88 patients had high GNRI (68 male, 77%). Baseline clinical characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. OS was significantly worse in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group (p = 0.048). There was no statistical difference in EFS between the two groups (p = 0.12). Multivariable analysis revealed that low GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.12-8.96, p = 0.029) and higher N category (HR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.58-12.06, p = 0.004) were associated with worse OS. For EFS, the higher N category was significantly associated with a worse outcome (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.16-5.59, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Poorer nutritional status before initiation of CCRT was associated with worse OS in older adults with LAHNC in the definitive setting. The GNRI is a convenient tool for predicting OS in older adult patients with LAHNC treated with CCRT.

Validation of JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with community-acquired Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia. We investigated the clinical features of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Chlamydia psittaci and validated the JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with C. psittaci CAP. METHODS: This study was conducted at 30 institutions and assessed a total of 72 sporadic cases with C. psittaci CAP, 412 cases with Mycoplasma pneumoniae CAP, and 576 cases with Streptococcus pneumoniae CAP. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 72 patients with C. psittaci CAP had a history of avian exposure. Among the six parameters of the JRS score, matching rates of four parameters were significantly lower in the C. psittaci CAP than the M. pneumoniae CAP in the following parameters: age <60 years, no or minor comorbid illness, stubborn or paroxysmal cough, and absence of chest adventitious sounds. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with C. psittaci CAP was significantly lower than the M. pneumoniae CAP (65.3% and 87.4%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the C. psittaci CAP were 90.5% for non-elderly patients and 30.0% for elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The JRS atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for distinguishing between C. psittaci CAP and bacterial CAP in patients aged <60 years, but not in patients aged ≥60 years. A history of avian exposure in middle-aged patients with normal white blood cell count may be suggestive of C. psittaci pneumonia.

Clinical characteristics of sarcoma cases in which long-term disease control was achieved with trabectedin treatment: A retrospective study.

Trabectedin is a therapeutic option for patients with advanced sarcoma. While a randomized trial demonstrated its prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), the reported PFS was <6 months. Some patients can achieve long-term disease control with this treatment. However, the reference information is insufficient. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed 51 sarcoma patients who received trabectedin. We analyzed the clinicopathological features, trabectedin dose, administration schedule, and clinical outcomes, including the overall response rate (ORR) and PFS. Among them, we assessed the detailed data of patients who achieved long-term disease control (PFS >1 year). The ORR in the 49 evaluable patients was 8%, and the median PFS in 51 patients was 7.5 months. Six patients (12%) achieved PFS of >1 year. Five of the six patients had metastatic lesions at trabectedin initiation. The pathological subtypes were myxoid liposarcoma (n = 2), leiomyosarcoma (n = 2), synovial sarcoma (n = 1), and Ewing sarcoma (n = 1). The final administration dose was the minimum dose (0.8 mg/m2) in two patients who continued the treatment over 20 cycles. The best radiological response was partial response (PR) in two myxoid liposarcoma patients and stable disease in four. The durations from trabectedin initiation to the first response in the two PR cases were 163 and 176 days, respectively. Our results support the validity of continuing trabectedin at a sustainable dose and interval in patients who can tolerate it. These results may be useful when considering the clinical application of trabectedin.

Prognosis of activities of daily living function in hospitalized patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia due to COVID-19.

Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) is associated with decreased physical function. We investigated the functional outcomes at 1 year after hospital discharge in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Functional decline rates for calculating the Barthel Index at the time of hospital discharge and at 1 year after hospital discharge were significantly higher in the NHCAP group than the community-acquired pneumonia group (at hospital discharge, 54.0% vs. 31.2%, respectively, p < 0.0001; 1 year follow-up, 37.9% vs. 8.6%, respectively, p < 0.0001). It is necessary to consider early rehabilitation, and treatment depending on the presence or absence of applicable criteria for NHCAP.

Assessment of the pneumonia severity score in community-acquired and nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia due to COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) pneumonia guidelines recommend simple predictive rules, the A-DROP scoring system, for assessment of the severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP). We evaluated whether the A-DROP system can be adapted for assessment of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. METHODS: Data from 1141 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were analyzed, comprising 502 patients observed in the 1st to 3rd wave period, 338 patients in the 4th wave and 301 patients in the 5th wave in Japan. RESULTS: The mortality rate and mechanical ventilation rate were 0% and 1.4% in patients classified with mild disease (A-DROP score, 0 point), 3.2% and 46.7% in those with moderate disease (1 or 2 points), 20.8% and 78.3% with severe disease (3 points), and 55.0% and 100% with extremely severe disease (4 or 5 points), indicating an increase in the mortality and mechanical ventilation rates in accordance with severity (Cochran-Armitage trend test; p = <0.001). This significant relationship between the severity in the A-DROP scoring system and either the mortality rate or mechanical ventilation rate was observed in patients with COVID-19 CAP and NHCAP. In each of the five COVID-19 waves, the same significant relationship was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate and mechanical ventilation rate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia increased depending on severity classified according to the A-DROP scoring system. Our results suggest that the A-DROP scoring system can be adapted for the assessment of severity of COVID-19 CAP and NHCAP.