RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare renal function (RF) outcomes after bladder-preserving tetramodal therapy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to those after radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS: This study included 95 patients treated with tetramodal therapy consisting of transurethral bladder tumour resection, chemoradiotherapy and partial cystectomy (PC) and 300 patients treated with RC. The annual change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was compared using the linear mixed model. Renal impairment was defined as a >25% decrease from the pretreatment eGFR, and renal impairment-free survival (RIFS) was calculated. The association between treatment type and renal impairment was assessed. RESULTS: The number of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 8 (8.4%) in the tetramodal therapy group and 75 (25.0%) in the RC group. After the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, the baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. The mean eGFR before treatment in tetramodal therapy and RC groups was 69.4 and 69.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 and declined with a slope of -0.7 and -1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. The annual deterioration rate of post-treatment eGFR in the tetramodal therapy group was milder than in the RC group. The 5-year RIFS rate in the tetramodal therapy and the RC groups was 91.2 and 85.2%, respectively. Tetramodal therapy was an independent factor of better RIFS compared with RC. CONCLUSIONS: RF was better preserved after tetramodal therapy than after radical therapy; however, even after tetramodal therapy, the eGFR decreased, and a non-negligible proportion of patients developed renal impairment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Cistectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Músculos/patología , Riñón/fisiología , Riñón/patología , Invasividad NeoplásicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the diagnostic performance of the three-dimensional reconstructed virtual image (3D-RVI) in evaluating RENAL nephrometry score (RENAL-NS). METHODS: This study included 130 patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography followed by partial nephrectomy for renal tumors suggestive of renal cell carcinoma. RENAL-NS was calculated prior to the surgery, and tumor resection was performed referring to the score. We retrospectively reviewed preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. We calculated the inter-observer variability of RENAL-NS using 3D-RVI vs two-dimensional (2D) imaging and compared the ability of RENAL-NS using 3D-RVI vs 2D imaging to predict the risk of opening of the urinary collecting system. We also compared the two modalities for the time required to evaluate RENAL-NS. RESULTS: RENAL-NS evaluated using 3D-RVI showed a higher inter-observer agreement compared to 2D-imaging (rs = 0.85 vs rs = 0.65). The "nearness to sinus" score was more strongly associated with the opening of the urinary collecting system when evaluated using 3D-RVI than 2D-imaging (AUC = 0.71 vs AUC = 0.57, P = .016). RENAL-NS using 2D-imaging required a significantly longer time compared to 3D-RVI (P = .036). CONCLUSION: Using 3D-RVI improves the accuracy, reliability and efficiency of RENAL-NS evaluation in preoperative assessment and can play an important role in preoperative assessment and intraoperative navigation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/patología , Riñón/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) during neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by either adjuvant continuous ADT (CADT) or intermittent ADT (IADT) for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (Pca). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced Pca. The patients were treated with 6 months (M) of ADT followed by 72 Gy of EBRT, and were randomly assigned to CADT or IADT after 14 M. The PROs were evaluated at sic points: baseline, 6 M, 8 M, 14 M, 20 M, and 38 M using FACT-P questionnaires and EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual bother subscales. RESULTS: The FACT-P total scores were significantly better (p < 0.05) in IADT versus CADT at 20 M (121.6 vs.115.4) and at 38 M (119.9 vs. 115.2). The physical well-being scores (PWB) were significantly better (p < 0.05) in IADT versus CADT at 38 M (25.4 vs. 24.0). The functional scores were significantly better in IADT than those in CADT at 14 M (20.2 vs18.7, p < 0.05) and at 20 M (21.0 vs.18.9, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The PRO was significantly favorable in IADT on FACT-P total score at 20 M and 38 M, PWB and functional scores at 38 M.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim as first-line chemotherapy for disseminated germ cell cancer. METHODS: This study reviewed 154 consecutive patients with previously untreated disseminated germ cell cancer who received first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin between 1995 and 2020. Of these, 54 patients were managed with primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim (primary prophylaxis group), and 100 were managed with the therapeutic use of short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (non-primary prophylaxis group). RESULTS: The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification identified 90 (58%)/40 (26%)/24 (16%) patients with good/intermediate/poor prognosis, respectively. Overall, 139 patients (90%) were disease free after etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin with/without post-chemotherapy surgery. The median relative dose intensity of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin was 96%, and there was a significant difference between the primary prophylaxis and non-primary prophylaxis groups (100% vs 90%, P < 0.01). The 5-year salvage treatment-free and overall survival rates were 83% and 94%, respectively. In total, 138 patients (90%) developed grade 4 hematological toxicities, and there were no treatment-related deaths due to myelosuppression. Grade 4 neutropenia was less commonly observed in the primary prophylaxis group compared with the non-primary prophylaxis group (80% vs 95%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin, and its sufficient efficacy and safety profiles are confirmed in current clinical practice. Primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim might further improve the feasibility of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin.
Asunto(s)
Ifosfamida , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Ifosfamida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Second-line salvage therapy for patients with metastatic germ-cell cancer (GCC) after the first-line combination of VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin) therapy has not been established. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the TGP (paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin) combination chemotherapy as a second-line salvage therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 16 consecutive patients with metastatic GCC who had been treated with first-line VIP therapy followed by second-line TGP therapy between 2005 and 2019 were reviewed and statistically analyzed. Ten patients, excluding the 6 patients treated with TGP without unequivocal progression, were included in the efficacy analysis. All 16 patients were included in the safety analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up period from initial TGP administration was 78 months (interquartile range, 46-120 months). The estimated 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates for the 10 patients in the efficacy analysis were 70% and 100%, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in all 16 patients, but none developed uncontrollable infections or life-threatening bleeding. One patient died of treatment-related secondary leukemia, however. CONCLUSION: The present study is to our knowledge the first to examine the therapeutic outcomes and safety profile of second-line TGP chemotherapy. VIP followed by TGP might be an alternative first- and second-line conventional regimen for patients with metastatic GCC in this granulocyte colony-stimulating factor era, especially for patients at a high risk of bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Cisplatino , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Etopósido , Humanos , Ifosfamida , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Terapia Recuperativa , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is a novel, non-steroidal anti-androgen that has demonstrated excellent anti-tumor activity for both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC and mCRPC) patients, and that is being rapidly introduced into clinical practice in Japan. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively investigated the treatment efficacy, safety profile, and prognostic factors of enzalutamide over a relatively long observation period in Japanese patients with nmCRPC and mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 184 consecutive Japanese patients with nmCRPC and mCRPC who started enzalutamide treatment in our institution between January 2012 and April 2018 were reviewed. Efficacy and safety profiles were assessed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Among these 184 patients, 44 (23.9%) nmCRPC patients, 89 (48.4%) docetaxel-naïve mCRPC patients, and 51 docetaxel-pretreated (27.7%) mCRPC patients underwent enzalutamide therapy. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods for nmCRPC patients were 39.2 months and not reached; those for docetaxel-naïve mCRPC patients were 16.5 months and 59.8 months; and those for docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC patients were 7.0 months and 30.4 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified performance status ≥ 2, PSA > 8.89 ng/mL (median value), hemoglobin < lower limit of normal range, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio > 3.0, and 4-week PSA decline < 50% as the predictive factors for shorter OS. Our respective prognostic models using these factors successfully demonstrated distinctly separated survival curves (p < 0.001). In addition, among these patients, 30 (16.3%) experienced adverse events and 16 (8.7%) experienced adverse events resulting in the discontinuation of therapy. Fatigue (14%) and appetite loss (7%) were the most common such events. CONCLUSIONS: Both the survival period and risk factors were extracted from a relatively long-term observation period. Since enzalutamide was approved for administration to patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer earlier this year (2020), we believe that the data presented here will be useful for both physicians and patients in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Benzamidas/farmacología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Nitrilos/farmacología , Feniltiohidantoína/farmacología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To assess the prophylactic efficacy of postoperative single intravesical instillation with pirarubicin (THP) and mitomycin C (MMC) for low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 clinically low-risk NMBC patients were preoperatively randomized into either THP (n=49) or MMC (n=54) groups. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods of the THP and MMC groups were 955 and 1008 days, respectively (p=0.76). Twelve patients (24.5%) in the THP group and 7 (13%) in the MMC group had bladder cancer recurrences. The two-year recurrence-free survival of the THP group and the MMC group was 77.8% and 86.4%, respectively (p=0.20). Neither groups had severe toxicity. CONCLUSION: In low-risk NMBC, the prophylactic effect against postoperative single intravesical instillation with THP was not superior to that with MMC.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravesical , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Cistoscopios , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In spite of the high incidence of infectious complications (ICs), appropriate duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for radical cystectomy (RC) with intestinal urinary diversion (IUD) has not been established. We compared the incidence of ICs after RC with IUD in patients using only intraoperative AMP or extended duration AMP. Risk factors for ICs were also investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent RC with IUD were divided into 2 groups based on the AMP duration (intraoperative only vs. extended duration for a median of 3 days). Between the groups, the incidence of ICs was compared. Risk factors for ICs were investigated in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The IC rate was 44%. No significant difference was found in the rate of ICs between the groups. The IC rate was significantly higher in patients with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Rates of ICs were 60 and 38% in patients with eGFR of less than 60 and equal or more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our result indicates that AMP that is administered more than intraoperatively may be excessive in RC with IUD. Patients with a lower eGFR should be particularly cared for postoperative ICs.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cistectomía , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Derivación Urinaria , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We report the case of a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with microsatellite instability-high who was treated with pembrolizumab after cabazitaxel administration. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old patient with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, whose prostate surgical specimen was disclosed as microsatellite instability-high, underwent pembrolizumab therapy. After initiation of pembrolizumab, his prostate-specific antigen level decreased, imaging findings showed good response with lymph node shrinkage, and his walking difficulty decreased dramatically. CONCLUSION: The rarity of microsatellite instability-high tumor in castration-resistant prostate cancer may hamper pembrolizumab administration. This potentially active agent should be considered as part of a treatment regimen for patients with microsatellite instability-high castration-resistant prostate cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a Japanese castration-resistant prostate cancer patient who demonstrated clinical benefit from pembrolizumab treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, research has not determined the optimal procedure for adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated for 6 months with neoadjuvant ADT and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced PCa between 2001 and 2006. Participants were treated with neoadjuvant ADT for 6 months. Then, 280 patients whose prostate-specific antigen levels were less than pretreatment levels and less than 10 ng/mL were randomized. All 280 participants were treated with 72 Gy of EBRT in combination with adjuvant ADT for 8 months. Thereafter, participants were assigned to long-term ADT (5 years in all; arm 1) or intermittent ADT (arm 2). The primary endpoint was modified biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) with respect to nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) progression, clinical relapse, or any cause of death. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after randomization was 8.2 years. Among the 136 and 144 men assigned to trial arms 1 and 2, respectively, 24 and 30 progressed to nmCRPC or clinical relapse, and 5 and 6 died of PCa. The 5-year modified bRFS rates were 84.8% and 82.8% in trial arms 1 and 2, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.132; 95% confidence interval, 0.744-1.722). CONCLUSIONS: Although modified bRFS data did not demonstrate noninferiority for arm 2, intermittent adjuvant ADT after EBRT with 14 months of neoadjuvant and short-term adjuvant ADT is a promising treatment strategy, especially in a population of responders after 6 months of ADT for locally advanced PCa.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (TGP) as second-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study comprised advanced UC progressed after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Advanced UC was defined as a non-resectable (T4b, any N or any T, or N2-3) or metastatic disease. Twenty-one patients were included in this study. TGP was administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: The ORR with TGP was 23.8%; the median PFS and OS were 4 and 8.4 months, respectively. The primary side effect was myelosuppression. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 71.4% and 42.9%, respectively. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: TGP is moderately effective and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for patients with UC.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Cisplatino/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the incidence and predictors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with elevated D-dimer prior to surgery for urologic malignancy. METHODS: Between January 2015 and September 2017, 987 consecutive patients underwent surgery for urologic malignancy under general anesthesia in our institution. Of these, 191 patients underwent preoperative venous ultrasonography of the lower extremities for DVT due to elevated D-dimer. We analyzed the incidence and predictors of DVT in these patients. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years. DVT was detected in 18% of patients (35/191). Multivariate analysis showed that the primary site of urologic malignancy (p < 0.01) and older age (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DVT. Patients with bladder cancer had the highest incidence of DVT. When bladder cancer and age of 70 or older were defined as predictors for DVT, the incidence of DVT in zero, 1, and 2 predictors was 3.4% (3/89), 29% (22/77), and 44% (11/25), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DVT was found in 18% of patients with elevated D-dimer prior to surgery for urologic malignancy. Bladder cancer patients and older patients in whom D-dimer has been elevated should undergo careful early examination for DVT.
Asunto(s)
Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias Urológicas/sangre , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/sangreRESUMEN
Historically, gastric metastasis from renal cell cancer (RCC) has been extremely rare. As RCC is now being treated with various agents of targeted therapy, however, the rate of unusual visceral metastases might increase as outcomes improve and follow-up periods grow longer. Here we present a valuable case of gastric metastasis from RCC detected in a routine CT scan during sequential targeted therapy. A 73-year-old man was referred to our hospital, presenting with left renal cell cancer with multiple lung metastases at stage cT1bN0M1. He received first-line targeted therapy consisting of sunitinib and subsequently underwent left radical nephrectomy. He then underwent sequential therapy consisting of interferon-alpha, sunitinib, everolimus, and axitinib for multiple lung metastases. Five years after nephrectomy, a follow-up computed tomography scan revealed a 2.2 × 1.6 cm mass in the stomach without any symptoms. Gastrointestinal endoscopy disclosed a polypoid lesion at the gastric fundus. Endoscopic submucosal resection was performed. Microscopic diagnosis revealed gastric metastasis from RCC. As various new therapeutic agents increase survival periods for metastatic RCC patients in this era of targeted therapy, clinicians must watch for metastasis in the stomach, though this was formerly a rare event.
RESUMEN
Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a well-established phenomenon in prostate cancer treated with combined androgen blockade (CAB). AWS is generally defined as subjective and/or objective improvement following discontinuation of an antiandrogen. However, the duration of the AWS response is usually limited. In addition, a complete response is quite rare. We herein present the case of a patient who achieved complete response from AWS, with the duration of this response lasting for >6 years. A 72-year-old man with metastatic prostate cancer received CAB with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog and bicalutamide. In addition, for local cancer control, external beam radiation therapy (70 Gy) to the prostate was performed. Subsequently, the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level reached a nadir (undetectable level). Four years later, the patient's serum PSA level started to rise, and bicalutamide was discontinued to confirm AWS at a serum PSA level of 0.34 ng/ml. The PSA level immediately decreased again to an undetectable level (0.00 ng/ml), where it has been remained for 6 years. Bone scintigraphy and computed tomography scans have shown no evidence of bone or other metastases since the introduction of AWS. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of such a long duration of complete response from AWS. Therefore, this phenomenon should always be considered, even in patients with advanced disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In order to help in selecting the optimum bone-modifying agent (BMA; zoledronic acid or denosumab), we investigated the impact of the BMA on the renal function of patients with bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study consisted of 118 patients who were treated with denosumab for bone metastases secondary to prostate cancer, renal cell cancer, and urothelial cancer at our hospital between 2012 and 2015. The clinical course of the renal function of these patients, treated with zoledronic acid or denosumab, was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients who were treated with denosumab during the study period, 57 (48 %) had previously been administered zoledronic acid and 61 (52 %) had received denosumab as the first-line BMA. The reasons for changing from zoledronic acid to denosumab were increased creatinine serum level (26 patients, 46 %), patient preference (16 patients, 28 %), difficulty with venous infusion (10 patients, 17 %), and other reasons (5 patients, 9 %). The median level of creatinine clearance in the patients who changed from zoledronic acid to denosumab due to increased serum creatinine level was 59.9 ml/min before administration of zoledronic acid, 40.9 ml/min at the beginning of denosumab treatment, 47.5 ml/min at 3 months after administration of denosumab, and 52.0 ml/min at the last follow-up. There were significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we demonstrated that the renal function of some patients, which had deteriorated following zoledronic acid administration, successfully improved after changing to denosumab.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Denosumab , Difosfonatos , Imidazoles , Neoplasias Urogenitales/patología , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Japón/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Urogenitales/epidemiología , Ácido ZoledrónicoRESUMEN
Enzalutamide is a novel, non-steroidal anti-androgen that was approved for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in 2014 in Japan. To assess the potency of enzalutamide treatment in Japan, we performed a pilot retrospective study. Among 91 patients who received treatment in our Institution between May 2014 and July 2015, 51 patients with docetaxel-naïve CRPC (56.0%) underwent enzalutamide therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.2 months and 27.9 months, respectively. The remaining 40 patients with CRPC (44.0%) underwent enzalutamide therapy after docetaxel. The median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and not reached, respectively. Among patients with docetaxel-naïve CRPC, 12 (24%) experienced adverse events, whereas 16 (40%) experienced adverse events after docetaxel. Fatigue (15%) and appetite loss (13%) were the most common. We partially clarified the characteristics of enzalutamide therapy in Japan. The PFS associated with enzalutamide might be shorter in Japanese patients.
Asunto(s)
Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Benzamidas , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/farmacología , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting metastasis and its impact on patient management with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with UTUC underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT after CT for initial staging (n = 47) and for restaging at recurrence (n = 9). Diagnostic accuracy for detecting metastases with PET/CT and CT was compared statistically. The impact of PET/CT on patient management was assessed by comparing questionnaires that were completed by the attending physicians before and after PET/CT. RESULTS: In the lesion-based analysis, 142 lesions were diagnosed as metastases. The sensitivity of PET/CT was significantly better than that of CT (85 vs. 50%, p = 0.0001). In the patient-based analysis, 22 patients were diagnosed as having metastases. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of PET/CT tended to be superior to those of CT, but these values were not significantly different (95, 91, and 93% vs. 82, 85, and 84%; p = 0.25, 0.50, and 0.063, respectively). The clinicians changed their assessments of disease extent and management plans in 18 (32%) and 11 (20%) patients, respectively, based on the PET/CT results. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for detecting metastasis was superior to that of CT. PET/CT provided additional information to the CT-based staging, which had an impact on patient management.
Asunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/química , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Urotelio/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The outcome of treatment of Japanese patients with urachal cancer is not well known. The purpose of this study is to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of Japanese patients with urachal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with urachal cancer who were treated in our hospital between 1994 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: We found 28 patients who had been diagnosed with urachal cancer and treated in our hospital during the study period. The median age of these patients was 52.3 years [interquartile range (IQR), 46.0-56.8 years]. Seventeen patients underwent surgery in our department. The median observation period of these patients was 42.6 months (IQR, 21.1-49.7 months). Among patients who had undergone surgery, cancer recurred in 7 (41 %). The estimated median time from surgery to recurrence and overall survival (OS) period were 35.8 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 7.7 months-not determined] and not reached, respectively. Seventeen patients received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The estimated median OS time from initial metastasis was 23.5 months (95 % CI, 11.8-33.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Urachal cancer is usually locally advanced at presentation and it has a high risk of distant metastases. However, long-term survival following surgical treatment occurs in a significant fraction of patients. This study indicates the current treatment results for patients with urachal cancer in Japanese clinical practice. To establish a standard operation method and chemotherapy, a multicenter, prospective study is needed in a larger population in the future.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cistectomía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: 'Flare phenomenon' after initial luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist administration is a widely approved concept in the treatment of prostate cancer. In most guidelines, concomitant therapy with anti-androgens is recommended to prevent this flare phenomenon. However, there are few reports describing serum prostate-specific antigen transitions after hormonal therapy. Here, we present a case of a man who experienced the biochemical and clinical flare phenomenon despite prior anti-androgen use and who has detailed data. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old Asian man with metastatic prostate cancer (multiple bone) was referred to our hospital. He was treated with prior anti-androgens and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Regardless of prior use of anti-androgens, his low back pain caused by bone metastases was deteriorated and serum prostate-specific antigen level was raised from 974.8 ng/mL to 2,555.5 ng/mL within 3 weeks. Then, his serum prostate specific antigen level started to decrease along with the pain. The nadir reached 1.0 ng/mL and remained for 6 months. Because the serum level of prostate-specific antigen then began to increase again, anti-androgen was discontinued for anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome. Then the serum level decreased again to less than 0.1 ng/mL. Until now, his serum prostate-specific antigen level has been maintained at less than 0.1 ng/mL for more than 30 months without any clinical progressions. CONCLUSION: We present the case of a patient in whom a clinical flare caused by an leuteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist was not prevented by prior anti-androgen administration. In addition, the nadir level of prostate-specific antigen when he received leuteinizing hormone-releasing hormone monotherapy was ten times lower than when he received concomitant therapy, and period of anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome was longer than usual. In this case, anti-androgen was probably not effective from the initial administration. Awareness of the possibility of ineffectiveness of anti-androgens is important in the treatment of symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer. Leuteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and surgical castration is a more reliable clinical approach for the prostate cancer patients with symptomatic metastatic disease.