Early Childcare Precarity and Subsequent Maternal Health.

PURPOSE: We examined prospective associations between early childcare precarity, or the security and reliability of childcare arrangements, and subsequent maternal health. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of survey responses from mothers of 2,836 children in the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing study. We assessed the following childcare measures: insecure childcare, insecure childcare with missed work, inadequate childcare, and emergency childcare support. We used linear and logistic regression models with robust standard errors to examine associations between these measures when the index child was age 3 and maternal health outcomes (overall health, depression, and parenting stress) later when the child was age 9. We then examined additive experiences of childcare measures across child ages 1 and 3 on maternal health outcomes. RESULTS: Early inadequate childcare was associated with higher odds of later poor maternal overall health (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.41). All early childcare precarity measures were associated with higher odds of maternal depression (insecure childcare [aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.23-2.18]; insecure childcare with missed work [aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13-2.22]; and inadequate childcare [aOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.22-2.51]). Emergency childcare support was associated with lower odds of adverse maternal health outcomes (poor overall health [aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.88]; depression [aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99]; and parenting stress [B -0.45; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.10]). Prolonged experiences had stronger associations with maternal health than shorter experiences. CONCLUSION: Early childcare precarity has long-term adverse associations with maternal health, and emergency childcare support seems to be favorable for maternal health. These findings highlight childcare precarity as a social determinant of women's health for researchers, clinicians, and decision-makers.

Material Hardship, Protective Factors, Children's Special Health Care Needs, and the Health of Mothers and Fathers.

BACKGROUND: Parents of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are at risk of poorer health outcomes. Material hardships also pose significant health risks to parents. Little is known about how protective factors may mitigate these risks and if effects are similar between mothers and fathers. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted using the US 2018/2019 National Survey of Children's Health, including parents of children 0 to 17 with income <200% of the federal poverty level. Separately, for parents of children with and without special health care needs (N-CSHCN), weighted logistic regression measured associations between material hardship, protective factors (family resilience, neighborhood cohesion, and receipt of family-centered care), and 2 outcomes: mental and physical health of mothers and fathers. Interactions were assessed between special health care needs status, material hardship, and protective factors. RESULTS: Sample consisted of parents of 16,777 children; 4440 were parents of CSHCN. Most outcomes showed similar associations for both mothers and fathers of CSHCN and N-CSHCN: material hardship was associated with poorer health outcomes, and family resilience and neighborhood cohesion associated with better parental health outcomes. Family-centered care was associated with better health of mothers but not fathers. Interaction testing showed that the protective effects of family resilience were lower among fathers of CSHCN experiencing material hardship. CONCLUSIONS: Family resilience and neighborhood cohesion are associated with better health outcomes for all parents, though these effects may vary by experience of special health care needs, parent gender, and material hardship.

Comparing youth with vs without outpatient mental health services on subsequent acute mental health care visits.

BACKGROUND: Use of acute care for mental health concerns has been increasing among youth in recent years. Improving access to outpatient mental health services may prevent downstream acute care visits. PURPOSE: To examine differences in rates of acute mental health care visits among youth with- versus without prior outpatient mental health services. METHODOLOGY: A total of 2,442 youth ages 14-17 years participated in a provincially representative cross-sectional epidemiological survey, the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study. This sample was individually linked to health administrative databases, with nearly universal coverage of all medically necessary physician and acute care visits. Our exposure was parent and youth reported outpatient mental health service use in the six-month period prior to completing the survey. Exposed youth (n=691) were matched with unexposed youth using a propensity score informed by a range of clinical and socio-demographic factors. Our outcome was acute mental health care visits in the 18-month period following completion of the survey, ascertained though the linked health administrative data. RESULTS: In our propensity score matched sample, we found no difference in rates of subsequent acute mental health care visits (HR= 1.14, 95%CI 0.44, 2.98) between youth with- versus without prior outpatient mental health services. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to further understand the types of services youth are receiving in outpatient settings to determine if, and for whom, outpatient mental health services reduces the likelihood of future acute mental health care visits.

Social Capital and Sleep Outcomes Across Childhood in United States Families.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether aspects of social capital, or benefits received from social relationships, are associated with regular bedtime and sleep duration across childhood in US families with lower income. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the 2018-19 National Survey of Children's Health in participants with incomes <400% federal poverty level. Separately for early childhood (0-5 years), school-age (6-12 years), and adolescence (13-17 years), we used weighted logistic regression to examine associations between social capital (measured by family social cohesion, parent social support, child social support) and sleep (measured by regular bedtime, sleep duration, adequate sleep per American of Academy of Sleep guidelines). Path analysis tested whether regular bedtime mediated associations between social capital and sleep duration. RESULTS: In our sample (N = 35,438), 84.9% had a regular bedtime, 60.2% had adequate sleep. Family social cohesion was associated with sleep duration and adequate sleep (infancy: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.18 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32, 3.60]; school age: aOR 2.03 [95% CI, 1.57, 2.63]; adolescence: aOR 2.44 [95% CI, 1.94, 3.09]). In toddlerhood, parent social support was associated with adequate sleep (aOR 1.44 [95% CI, 1.06, 1.96]). In adolescence, child social support was associated with regular bedtime (aOR 1.70 [95% CI, 1.25, 2.32]. Across childhood, associations between family social cohesion and sleep duration were partially mediated by regular bedtime. CONCLUSIONS: Family social cohesion was associated with adequate sleep across childhood, this was partially mediated by regular bedtime. Associations between social support and sleep outcomes varied by development stage. Future work should consider how supportive relationships may influence child sleep outcomes.

Cash transfer programs and child health and family economic outcomes: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Family income is an important determinant of child and parental health. In Canada, cash transfer programs to families with children have existed since 1945. This systematic review aimed to examine the association between cash transfer programs to families with children and health outcomes in Canadian children (ages 0 to 18) as well as family economic outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed academic and grey literature published up to November 2021. Additional studies were identified through reference review. We included any study that examined children 0-18 years old and/or their parents, took place in Canada and reported Canada-specific data, and reported child, youth and/or parental health outcomes, as well as family economic outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed by two reviewers using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. SYNTHESIS: Our search yielded 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria out of 7052 identified. Eight studies in total measured child health outcomes, including birth outcomes, child overall health, and developmental and behavioural outcomes, and four directly addressed parental health, including mental health, injuries, and obesity. Most studies reported generally positive associations, though some findings were specific to certain subgroups. Some studies also examined fertility and labour force participation outcomes, which described varying effects. CONCLUSION: Cash transfer programs to families with children in Canada are associated with better child and parental health outcomes. Additional research is needed to evaluate the mechanisms of effects, and to identify which types and levels of government transfers are most effective, and target populations, to optimize the positive effects of these benefits.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Le revenu familial est un important déterminant de la santé infantile et parentale. Au Canada, des programmes de transferts monétaires aux familles avec enfants existent depuis 1945. Notre revue systématique visait à examiner l'association entre les programmes de transferts monétaires aux familles avec enfants et les résultats cliniques chez les enfants canadiens (0 à 18 ans), ainsi que les résultats économiques familiaux. MéTHODE: Nous avons passé en revue la littérature spécialisée et la littérature grise publiées jusqu'en novembre 2021. D'autres études ont été répertoriées par une revue des références. Nous avons inclus toute étude portant sur les enfants de 0 à 18 ans et/ou leurs parents, menée au Canada, rapportant des données propres au Canada et rapportant les résultats cliniques d'enfants, de jeunes et/ou de parents, ainsi que les résultats économiques de familles. Le risque de biais a été évalué par deux évaluateurs à l'aide d'une échelle de Newcastle-Ottawa modifiée. SYNTHèSE: Sur les 7 052 études repérées dans notre recherche, 23 répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. En tout, huit études mesuraient les résultats cliniques d'enfants, dont les issues de la grossesse, la santé globale des enfants et les résultats développementaux et comportementaux, et quatre études portaient directement sur la santé parentale, dont la santé mentale, les blessures et l'obésité. La plupart des études faisaient généralement état d'associations positives, mais certaines constatations étaient spécifiques à certains sous-groupes. Quelques études portaient aussi sur la fécondité et la participation à la population active et décrivaient une diversité d'effets. CONCLUSION: Les programmes de transferts monétaires aux familles avec enfants au Canada sont associés à de meilleurs résultats cliniques infantiles et parentaux. Il faudrait pousser la recherche pour évaluer les mécanismes des effets constatés et pour déterminer quels sont les types et les niveaux de transferts gouvernementaux qui sont les plus efficaces, ainsi que les populations cibles, pour optimiser les effets positifs de ces prestations.

Income and neighbourhood deprivation in relation to obesity in urban dwelling children 0-12 years of age: a cross-sectional study from 2013 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a major public health concern. This study evaluated the independent and joint associations of family-level income, neighbourhood-level income and neighbourhood deprivation, in relation to child obesity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in children ≤12 years of age from TARGet Kids! primary care network (Greater Toronto Area, 2013-2019). Parent-reported family income was compared with median neighbourhood income and neighbourhood deprivation measured using the Ontario Marginalization Index. Children's height and weight were measured and body mass index (BMI) z-scores (zBMI) were calculated. ORs and 95% CIs were estimated for the three exposure variables separately using multilevel multinomial logistic regression models with zBMI categories as the outcome, adjusting in model 1 for age, sex, ethnicity and number of family members and in model 2 adding family income. A joint measure was derived combining income and deprivation measures. RESULTS: A total of 5962 children were included. Low family income (Q1 vs Q5: OR=4.69, 95% CI 2.65 to 8.29), low neighbourhood income (Q1 vs Q5: OR=2.18, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.58) and high neighbourhood deprivation (Q1 vs Q5: OR=2.45, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.95) were each associated with increased OR of child obesity. However, after adjustment for family income, the association for both neighbourhood income (OR=1.39, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.34) and deprivation (OR=1.56, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.58) and obesity was attenuated. Children from low-income families living in low-income or high deprivation neighbourhoods had higher OR of obesity. CONCLUSION: Child obesity was independently associated with low family-level income and a joint measure suggests that neighbourhood also matters. Socioeconomic inequalities at both individual and neighbourhood levels should be addressed in childhood obesity interventions.

Mortality Among Parents of Children With Major Congenital Anomalies.

BACKGROUND: A mother whose child has a chronic condition, such as a major congenital anomaly, often experiences poorer long-term health, including earlier mortality. Little is known about the long-term health of fathers of infants with a major congenital anomaly. METHODS: In this population-based prospective cohort study, we used individual-linked Danish registry data. Included were all mothers and fathers with a singleton infant born January 1, 1986, to December 31, 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to generate hazard ratios for all-cause and cause-specific mortality among mothers and fathers whose infant had an anomaly and fathers of unaffected infants, relative to mothers of unaffected infants (referent), adjusted for child's year of birth, parity, parental age at birth, parental comorbidities, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 20 952 of 965 310 mothers (2.2%) and 20 655 of 951 022 fathers (2.2%) had an infant with a major anomaly. Median (interquartile range) of parental follow-up was 17.9 (9.5 to 25.5) years. Relative to mothers of unaffected infants, mothers of affected infants had adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of death of 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.32), fathers of unaffected infants had intermediate aHR (1.62, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.66), and fathers of affected infants had the highest aHR (1.76, 95% CI: 1.64 to 1.88). Heightened mortality was primarily due to cardiovascular and endocrine/metabolic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers and fathers of infants with a major congenital anomaly experience an increased risk of mortality, often from preventable causes. These findings support including fathers in interventions to support the health of parental caregivers.

Associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Need and Unmet Need for Care Coordination.

Introduction: Children exposed to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may access multiple systems of care to address medical and social complexities. Care coordination (CC) optimizes health outcomes for children with special health care needs who often use multiple systems of care. Little is known about whether ACEs are associated with need and unmet need for CC. Methods: Use of the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children's Health to identify children who saw ≥1 health care provider in the last 12 months. The study team used weighted logistic regression analyses to examine associations between 9 ACE types, ACE score and need and unmet need for CC. Results: In the sample (N=39,219, representing 38,316,004 US children), material hardship (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29-1.75), parental mental illness (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60), and neighborhood violence (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74) were significantly associated with an increased need for CC. Material hardship was also associated with unmet need for CC (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.80 - 3.11). Children with ACE scores of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 had higher odds of need and unmet need for CC than children with 0 ACEs. Discussion: Specific ACE types and higher ACE scores were associated with need and unmet need for CC. Evaluating the unique needs of children who endured ACEs should be considered in the design and implementation of CC processes in the pediatric healthcare system.

Relationships Between Material Hardship, Resilience, and Health Care Use.

BACKGROUND: Material hardship has been associated with adverse health care use patterns for children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In this study, we assessed if resilience factors were associated with lower emergency department (ED) visits and unmet health care needs and if they buffered associations between material hardship and health care use for CSHCN and children without special health care needs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health, restricted to low-income participants (<200% federal poverty level). Separately, for CSHCN and children without special health care needs, weighted logistic regression was used to measure associations between material hardship, 2 resilience factors (family resilience and neighborhood cohesion), and 2 measures of use. Moderation was assessed using interaction terms. Mediation was assessed using structural equation models. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 11 543 children (weighted: n = 28 465 581); 26% were CSHCN. Material hardship was associated with higher odds of ED visits and unmet health care needs for all children. Resilience factors were associated with lower odds of unmet health care needs for CSHCN (family resilience adjusted odds ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.94; neighborhood cohesion adjusted odds ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.88). For CSHCN, lower material hardship mediated associations between resilience factors and unmet health care needs. Neighborhood cohesion moderated the association between material hardship and ED visits (interaction term: P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Among low-income CSHCN, resilience factors may buffer the effects of material hardship on health care use. Future research should evaluate how resilience factors can be incorporated into programs to support CSHCN.

Material Hardships and Health Care Utilization Among Low-Income Children with Special Health Care Needs.

OBJECTIVE: Material hardships, defined as difficulty meeting basic needs, are associated with adverse child health outcomes, including suboptimal health care utilization. Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) may be more vulnerable to the effects of hardships. Our objective was to determine associations between material hardships and health care utilization among CSHCN. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study surveying caregivers of 2- to 12-year-old CSHCN in a low-income, urban area. Independent variables were parent-reported material hardships: difficulty paying bills, food insecurity, housing insecurity, and health care hardship. Dependent variables were parent-reported number of emergency department (ED) visits, any hospital admission, and any unmet health care need. We used negative binomial and logistic regression to assess for associations between each hardship and each outcome. RESULTS: We surveyed 205 caregivers between July 2017 and May 2018 and analyzed the data in 2018. After adjustment, difficulty paying bills (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.12) and health care hardship (IRR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.08-2.75) were associated with higher rates of ED visits. There were no associations between hardships and hospital admission. Difficulty paying bills (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.14-3.98), food insecurity (AOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02-3.71), and housing insecurity (AOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.36-5.40) were associated with higher odds of unmet health care need. CONCLUSIONS: Material hardships were associated with higher rates of ED visits and greater unmet health care need among low-income CSHCN. Future examination of the mechanisms of these associations is needed to enhance support for families of CSHCN.