Rasch analysis of the modified Fatigue Severity Scale in neuromuscular disorders and comparison between sex, age and diagnoses.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom encountered in the neuromuscular clinic. The 7-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-7) is a Rasch-modified assessment validated in inflammatory neuropathies but not across a typical neuromuscular patient population. The aim of this study was to validate this measure in neuromuscular disorders and to compare between patient sex, age and diagnoses. METHODS: The modified FSS-7 was mailed to patients recruited from a specialist neuromuscular clinic at the Walton Centre. Responses were subjected to Rasch analysis and descriptive statistics were performed on the Rasch converted data. RESULTS: The mFSS-7 met the Rasch model expectations with an overall Chi-square probability of 0.4918, a strict unidimensional scale free from differential item functioning (DIF) that satisfied the model with substantial test-retest reliability using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.77). A 15.7% ceiling effect was observed in this patient cohort. Post hoc analysis did not show any significant difference in fatigue between sex, age or neuromuscular diagnoses. DISCUSSION: The self-completed Rasch mFSS-7 showed acceptable test-retest reliability across patients with varied disorders under follow-up in a specialist neuromuscular clinic. The ceiling effect constrains its use for those with the most severe fatigue. Future considerations could include assessment of the benefits of clinical interventions, particularly multidisciplinary team input or dedicated fatigue clinics.

Rasch analysis of the Unidimensional Self-Efficacy Scale in Neuromuscular Disorders and comparison between sex, age, and diagnoses.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Self-efficacy reflects a person's perceptions of their capabilities for specific tasks and influences motivation and performance. The Unidimensional Self-Efficacy in Neuromuscular Disorders (USE-NM) was modified from the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) USE-MS scale and administered to patients attending a specialist neuromuscular clinic. The aim was to investigate this measure in neuromuscular disorders and to compare between patient sex, age, and diagnosis. METHODS: The USE-NM was posted to patients recruited from a specialist neuromuscular clinic at the Walton Centre. Responses were subjected to Rasch analysis using RUMM2030 software and descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS version 28. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients (56.1% male) grouped by age (<50; 50-59; 60-69; and >69 years) and with varied NM disorders returned the USE-NM. It did not meet the Rasch model expectations due to disordered thresholds of items 6 and 8 ("Sometimes I feel inadequate as a person because of my neuromuscular disorder" and "I feel that my social life would be better if I did not have a neuromuscular disorder"). Following item re-scoring, the modified USE-NM satisfied the Rasch model with a unidimensional scale free from differential item functioning and an overall chi-square probability of 0.146 with good reliability and validity. Post hoc nonparametric testing showed no significant difference in fatigue between sex, age, and neuromuscular diagnoses. DISCUSSION: The Rasch-modified USE-NM offers a measure of self-efficacy for neuromuscular disorders encountered in a typical specialist clinic. Future considerations could be given to assessing any benefits of multidisciplinary team input, across a specialist neuromuscular service.