Helping Blind People Grasp: Evaluating a Tactile Bracelet for Remotely Guiding Grasping Movements.

The problem of supporting visually impaired and blind people in meaningful interactions with objects is often neglected. To address this issue, we adapted a tactile belt for enhanced spatial navigation into a bracelet worn on the wrist that allows visually impaired people to grasp target objects. Participants' performance in locating and grasping target items when guided using the bracelet, which provides direction commands via vibrotactile signals, was compared to their performance when receiving auditory instructions. While participants were faster with the auditory commands, they also performed well with the bracelet, encouraging future development of this system and similar systems.

Perception of semantic relations in scenes: A registered report study of attention hold.

To what extent the semantic relations present in scenes guide spatial attention automatically remains a matter of debate. Considering that spatial attention can be understood as a sequence of shifts, engagements, and disengagements, semantic relations might affect each stage of this process differently. Therefore, we investigated whether objects that violate semantic rules engage attention for longer than objects that are expected in a given context. The experiment involved a central presentation of a distractor scene that contained a semantically congruent or incongruent object, and a peripheral presentation of a small target letter. We found that incongruent scenes did not delay responses to the peripheral target, which indicates that they did not hold attention for longer than congruent scenes. Therefore, by showing that violations of semantic relations do not engage attention automatically, our study contributes to a better understanding of how attention operates in naturalistic settings.

The forest, the trees, or both? Hierarchy and interactions between gist and object processing during perception of real-world scenes.

The global-to-local theories of perception assume that the gist of a scene is computed early and automatically, whereas recognition of objects occurs at a later processing stage, requires attentional resources, and is primed by the representation of gist. To test these theoretical predictions, we investigated the processing hierarchy of gist- and object-recognition and their interaction in two experiments (total N = 60). Backward-masked images of real-world scenes were presented for a range of brief durations - between 8 ms and 100 ms, and participants performed either an object or a background classification task, in separate blocks. We report three main findings. First, scenes' backgrounds were generally classified more accurately than foreground objects, but recognition of objects was boosted to the same level as backgrounds by cueing spatial attention to the exact object's location. Second, backgrounds influence objects' recognition, as objects presented within semantically incongruent backgrounds were classified less accurately. Third, objects influence background categorization, as backgrounds comprising incongruent objects were also classified less accurately. Therefore, the first two findings support the global-to-local theories, implying that gists are indeed more readily perceived than objects, probably at an earlier stage. Yet the latter finding that objects also influence gist recognition suggests a more parallel and interactive view of both processes than previously assumed.

Automatic Attention Capture by Threatening, But Not by Semantically Incongruent Natural Scene Images.

Visual objects are typically perceived as parts of an entire visual scene, and the scene's context provides information crucial in the object recognition process. Fundamental insights into the mechanisms of context-object integration have come from research on semantically incongruent objects, which are defined as objects with a very low probability of occurring in a given context. However, the role of attention in processing of the context-object mismatch remains unclear, with some studies providing evidence in favor, but other against an automatic capture of attention by incongruent objects. Therefore, in the present study, 25 subjects completed a dot-probe task, in which pairs of scenes-congruent and incongruent or neutral and threatening-were presented as task-irrelevant distractors. Importantly, threatening scenes are known to robustly capture attention and thus were included in the present study to provide a context for interpretation of results regarding incongruent scenes. Using N2 posterior-contralateral ERP component as a primary measure, we revealed that threatening images indeed capture attention automatically and rapidly, but semantically incongruent scenes do not benefit from an automatic attentional selection. Thus, our results suggest that identification of the context-object mismatch is not preattentive.