RESUMEN
Intestinal transplantation is a complex procedure both in terms of anesthesia and surgery. In particular, pediatric anesthesia management during intestinal transplant surgery can become even more complicated. It has been stated that propofol, remifentanil, and sevoflurane reduce patient mortality by reducing the incidence of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Although studies of these agents continue to be conducted in vivo or in vitro, these anesthetics are currently used for specific procedures that have a high risk of incurring ischemia-reperfusion injury. Herein, we present the case of a male child, aged 20 months, who was dependent on total parenteral nutrition and was found to have intestinal failure associated with liver disease type 1. Hematologic tests showed findings of anemia and metabolic acidosis. Propofol was administered for induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia maintenance was achieved using sevoflurane with remifentanil infusion. We ensured safe and adequate vascular access in the patient and performed hematologic and biochemical tests with detailed system controls. Before the procedure, we prepared a leukocyte-poor erythrocyte suspension, leukocyte-poor random or apheresis platelets, and ABO- and Rh-compatible fresh frozen plasma. We monitored for signs of acidosis, hypotension, coagulation disorders, and hyperkalemia during the reperfusion period. We maintained patient normothermia. In this case report on the anesthetic management of a pediatric patient aged 20 months who received a small bowel transplant due to microvillous inclusion disease, we found that the selection of anesthetic agents may affect the prognosis of future surgical procedures.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of preincisional and intraperitoneal levobupivacaine or normal saline in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients who participated in the study were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 received intraperitoneal levobupivacaine (0.25% 40 mL) immediately after the pneumoperitoneum. Group 2 received periportal levobupivacaine (0.25% 5 mL in each trochar incision area) before incision and intraperitoneal levobupivacaine (0.25% 40 mL) immediately after the pneumoperitoneum. Group 3 received for periportal and intraperitoneal instillation of normal saline. The visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours for both shoulder and abdominal pain were recorded. Analgesia requirements and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no difference between the groups for demographic data. The pain scores were lower in Groups 1 and 2 than Group 3 (control) during rest, cough and movement (p<0.05). Rescue analgesic treatment was significantly lower in patients of Group 2 (15%) as compared with that of Groups 1 (35%) and 3 (90%) (p<0.05). The incidence of shoulder pain was significantly lower in Group 2 (25%) and Group 1 (20%) than in any of the control group patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicated that 0.25% levobupivacaine was effective in preventing pain and the need for postoperative analgesic when intraperitoneal instillation or preincisional local infiltration in combination with intraperitoneal instillation. However, levobupivacaine for preincisional local infiltration in combination with intraperitoneal instillation is the better choice because of its higher efficacy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metastasis to bone from endometrial adenocarcinoma is rare, when metastasises it usually locates in axial skeleton. Metastasis to extremities is extremely rare. Additionally the detection of the bone metastasis as a presenting feature is uncommon. In the present study we report the 10th cases of bone metastasis in the literature which located at tibial diaphysis and originated from endometrial adenocarcinoma as a presenting feature of the primary disease. CASE: Single tibial lesion was observed in a 70 years old woman. Biopsy confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the unknown origin. We couldn't find the primary origin with aggressive work-up. Tibial lesion regressed with radiotherapy. Endometrial adenocarcinoma is detected after the end of disease-free one year with the symptom of vaginal bleeding. After 47 months from initial tibial lesion and 35 months from gynaecologic operation, patient is still alive and disease free. DISCUSSION: Patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma presenting an isolated skeletal metastasis may exhibit an unusual group with a better prognosis.
