Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Kans J Med ; 13: 300-303, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33312413
2.
J Fam Pract ; 65(8): 554-73, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27660839

RESUMEN

A 63-year-old woman with a history of hyperlipidemia presented to our hospital with a swollen right hand. The patient noted that she had closed her hand in a car door one week earlier, causing minor trauma to the right third metacarpophalangeal joint. Shortly after injuring her hand, she'd sought care at an outpatient facility, where she was given a diagnosis of cellulitis and a prescription for an oral antibiotic. The swelling, however, worsened, prompting her visit to our hospital.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Celulitis (Flemón)/etiología , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/tratamiento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Edema/complicaciones , Edema/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/complicaciones , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/patología
3.
J Crit Care ; 36: 43-48, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27546746

RESUMEN

Studies and meta-analyses conflict regarding the use of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for septic shock. We sought to clarify the conflict by performing a living systematic review and meta-regression. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and explored heterogeneity with meta-regression. We conformed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and qualified strength of evidence with a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation profile. RESULTS: Overall, EGDT did not significantly reduce mortality compared with usual care (relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.08); however, heterogeneity was substantial (I2=64%; 95% confidence interval, 12%-85%). Illness severity did not correlate with mortality reduction; however, there were significant correlations with control rate mortality and the strategy employed by the control group. Benefit was confined to trials with a control mortality greater than 35%. Compared with monitoring of lactate clearance and central venous pressure, EGDT mortality was higher. CONCLUSION: The benefit of EGDT is evident in populations with high mortality, in line with reported global mortality rates. In settings with low mortality the recent trials challenge the need for 6-hour goals; however, most patients in these trials met 3-hour resuscitation goals as defined by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. In settings with higher mortality, EGDT or normalization of lactate/central venous pressure may be viable therapeutic options.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Resucitación/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA