Rib-based Distraction Device Implantation Before Age 3 Associated With Higher Unplanned Rate of Return to the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with rib-based implants such as the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) is associated with a high rate of complications including surgical site infection, skin breakdown, and implant migration. Many of these complications warrant the need for unplanned reoperations, increasing the burden on an already vulnerable patient population, and introducing the further risk of infection. To provide insight into the risks of early intervention, we investigate the relationship between initial device implantation before the age of 3 and the rate of unplanned reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients at a single institution who had undergone VEPTR insertion for EOS with at least a 2-year follow-up from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified into the case-cohort (0 to 2 y of age) or the comparison cohort (3 to 10 y of age) based on age at the time of device implantation. Multivariate regression accounting for age and scoliosis etiology was performed to identify factors predictive of unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 137 of 185 patients treated with VEPTR were identified with 76 (56%) undergoing at least 1 unplanned reoperation during the study time period. There were 68 and 69 patients in the age 0- to 2-year and 3- to 10-year cohorts, respectively. Patients aged 0 to 2 years underwent a higher number of total procedures compared with those aged 3 to 10 (13.1±6.5 vs. 10.6±4.8, P=0.032). A significant difference was found in the rate of unplanned reoperation between the 2 cohorts with 44 (65%) patients aged 0 to 2 and 32 (46%) patients aged 3 to 10 undergoing at least 1 unplanned reoperation (P=0.031). Binary logistic multivariate regression accounting for age and scoliosis etiology demonstrated that patients aged 0 to 2 had a significantly greater odds of undergoing an unplanned reoperation (odds ratio=3.050; 95% confidence interval: 1.285-7.241; P=0.011) compared with patients aged 3 to 10 years. CONCLUSION: Overall, EOS patients aged 0 to 2 at initial VEPTR implantation are up to 3 times higher risk of undergoing an unplanned reoperation compared with those aged 3 to 10. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Thoracic Quantitative Dynamic MRI to Understand Developmental Changes in Normal Ventilatory Dynamics.

BACKGROUND: A database of normative quantitative measures of regional thoracic ventilatory dynamics, which is essential to understanding better thoracic growth and function in children, does not exist. RESEARCH QUESTION: How to quantify changes in the components of ventilatory pump dynamics during childhood via thoracic quantitative dynamic MRI (QdMRI)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Volumetric parameters were derived via 51 dynamic MRI scans for left and right lungs, hemidiaphragms, and hemichest walls during tidal breathing. Volume-based symmetry and functional coefficients were defined to compare left and right sides and to compare contributions of the hemidiaphragms and hemichest walls with tidal volumes (TVs). Statistical analyses were performed to compare volume components among four age-based groups. RESULTS: Right thoracic components were significantly larger than left thoracic components, with average ratios of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.41-1.70) for lung TV, 1.81 (95% CI, 1.60-2.03) for hemidiaphragm excursion TV, and 1.34 (95% CI, 1.21-1.47) for hemichest wall excursion TV. Right and left lung volumes at end-expiration showed, respectively, a 44% and 48% increase from group 2 (8 ≤ age < 10) to group 3 (10 ≤ age < 12). These numbers from group 3 to group 4 (12 ≤ age ≤ 14) were 24% and 28%, respectively. Right and left hemichest wall TVs exhibited, respectively, 48% and 45% increases from group 3 to group 4. INTERPRETATION: Normal right and left ventilatory volume components have considerable asymmetry in morphologic features and dynamics and change with age. Chest wall and diaphragm contributions vary in a likewise manner. Thoracic QdMRI can provide quantitative data to characterize the regional function and growth of the thorax as it relates to ventilation.

Can We Save the Implant: Rib-based Implant Removal Rates and Risk Factors Following Irrigation and Debridement (I&D) Surgery?

BACKGROUND: In the event of a surgical site infection, management includes surgical debridement in an attempt to treat the infection and retain the implant; however they are often unsuccessful in this regard. Although studies have described the incidence of complications, current literature does not have sufficient evidence to provide clear recommendations regarding retention versus removal of implants. This study aims to identify predictive factors associated with the need for implant removal to decrease unnecessary attempts at implant retention. METHODS: A retrospective review of early-onset scoliosis patients at a single institution treated with rib-based vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implants who developed infection requiring irrigation and debridement (I&D) due to wound problems including surgical site infection, skin slough, and wound dehiscence. All patients had a minimum of a 2-year follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the odds of implant removal. RESULTS: Fifty-nine of 181 patients (32%) required an I&D due to a wound problem. These patients underwent the initial implant procedure at a mean age of 4.6±3.8 years. In total, 29 patients ultimately underwent implant removal. Significant predictive factors for removal included total number of wound problems, total number of I&Ds, days from identification of wound problem to I&D procedure, days on antibiotics, total number of surgeries, presence of gastrostomy tube, and nonambulatory status (P<0.0001, 0.001, 0.095, 0.093, 0.082, 0.054, and 0.026, respectively). Multiple logistic regression results indicated a total number of wound problems [odds ratio (OR): 6.00, P=0.001], average days from identification of wound problem to I&D (OR: 1.03, P=0.039), and presence of a gastrostomy tube (OR: 5.7, P=0.07) as independent predictors for implant removal. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggests that time from the onset of signs of infection until debridement surgery inversely correlates with the ability to retain the implants. In addition, gastrostomy tube and history of previous wound infections may be predictive clinical factors for implant removal in patients with a rib-based vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib instrumentation. Such information can be useful for clinicians in deciding on whom to attempt implant retention versus removal when a wound problem presents itself. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.