Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 59(2): 186-200, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37904314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects. AIMS: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC. METHODS: In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years. RESULTS: There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2. CONCLUSIONS: Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar , Humanos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/efectos adversos , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Colestasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colestasis/inducido químicamente , Biomarcadores , Fosfatasa Alcalina , Bilirrubina
2.
J Hepatol ; 77(2): 353-364, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35367282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We examined the efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist, in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at risk of disease progression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] ≥1.67xupper limit of normal [ULN]) who were receiving or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid. METHODS: In this 52-week, phase II, dose-ranging, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to seladelpar 5 mg/day (n = 53) or 10 mg/day (n = 55) or assigned to 2 mg/day (n = 11; United Kingdom sites after interim analysis) for 12 weeks. Doses could then be uptitrated to 10 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was ALP change from baseline to Week 8. RESULTS: Mean baseline ALP was 300, 345, and 295 U/L in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients had cirrhosis, 71% had pruritus. At Week 8, mean ± standard error ALP reductions from baseline were 26 ± 2.8%, 33 ± 2.6%, and 41 ± 1.8% in the 2 mg (n = 11), 5 mg (n = 49), and 10 mg (n = 52) cohorts (all p ≤0.005), respectively. Responses were maintained or improved at Week 52, after dose escalation in 91% and 80% of the 2 mg and 5 mg cohorts, respectively. At Week 52, composite response (ALP <1.67xULN, ≥15% ALP decrease, and normal total bilirubin) rates were 64%, 53%, and 67%, and ALP normalization rates were 9%, 13%, and 33% in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Pruritus visual analog scale score was decreased in the 5 mg and 10 mg cohorts. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and 4 patients discontinued due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Seladelpar demonstrated robust, dose-dependent, clinically significant, and durable improvements in biochemical markers of cholestasis and inflammation in patients with PBC at risk of disease progression. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated and was not associated with any increase in pruritus. GOV NUMBER: NCT02955602 CLINICALTRIALSREGISTER. EU NUMBER: 2016-002996-91 LAY SUMMARY: Current treatment options for patients living with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are not optimal due to inadequate effectiveness or undesirable side effects. Patients with PBC who took seladelpar, a new treatment being developed for PBC, at increasing doses (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) for 1 year had clinically significant, dose-dependent improvements in key liver tests. Treatment appeared safe and was not associated with any worsening in patient self-reported itch scores.


Asunto(s)
Cirrosis Hepática Biliar , Acetatos , Adulto , Fosfatasa Alcalina , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Prurito/etiología , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/efectos adversos
3.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 2(10): 716-726, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28818518

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with primary biliary cholangitis have an inadequate response to first-line therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. Seladelpar is a potent, selective agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta (PPAR-δ), which is implicated in bile acid homoeostasis. This first-in-class study evaluated the anti-cholestatic effects and safety of seladelpar in patients with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid. METHODS: The study was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of patients with alkaline phosphatase of at least 1·67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) despite treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid. Patients, recruited at 29 sites in North America and Europe, were randomly assigned to placebo, seladelpar 50 mg/day, or seladelpar 200 mg/day while ursodeoxycholic acid was continued. Randomisation was done centrally (1:1:1) by a computerised system using an interactive voice-web response system with a block size of three. Randomisation was stratified by region (North America and Europe). The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline in alkaline phosphatase over 12 weeks, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population (any randomised patient who received at least one dose of medication and had at least one post-baseline alkaline phosphatase evaluation). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02609048) and the EU Clinical Trials Registry (EudraCT2015-002698-39). FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2015, and May 26, 2016, 70 patients were screened at 29 sites in North America and Europe. During recruitment, three patients treated with seladelpar developed fully reversible, asymptomatic grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increases (one on 50 mg, two on 200 mg), ranging from just over five to 20 times the ULN; as a result, the study was terminated after 41 patients were randomly assigned. The modified ITT population consisted of 12 patients in the placebo group, 13 in the seladelpar 50 mg group, and 10 in the seladelpar 200 mg group. Mean changes from baseline in alkaline phosphatase were -2% (SD 16) in the placebo group, -53% (14) in the seladelpar 50 mg group, and -63% (8) in the seladelpar 200 mg group. Changes in both seladelpar groups versus placebo were significant (p<0·0001 for both groups vs placebo), with no significant difference between the two seladelpar groups (p=0·1729). All five patients who received seladelpar for 12 weeks had normal alkaline phosphatase values at the end of treatment, based on a central laboratory ULN for alkaline phosphatase of 116 U/L. The most frequently reported adverse events were pruritus (16%; one patient on placebo, four on seladelpar 50 mg, and one on seladelpar 200 mg), nausea (13%; one patient on placebo, three on seladelpar 50 mg, and one on seladelpar 200 mg), diarrhoea (10%; two patients on placebo, one on seladelpar 50 mg, and one on seladelpar 200 mg), dyspepsia (8%; two patients on seladelpar 50 mg and one on seladelpar 200 mg), muscle spasms (8%; three patients on seladelpar 200 mg), myalgia (8%; one patient on placebo and two on seladelpar 200 mg), and dizziness (8%; one patient on placebo and two on seladelpar 50 mg). INTERPRETATION: Seladelpar normalised alkaline phosphatase levels in patients who completed 12 weeks of treatment. However, treatment was associated with grade 3 increases in aminotransferases and the study was stopped early. The effects of seladelpar should be explored at lower doses. FUNDING: CymaBay Therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Colangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , PPAR delta/agonistas , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Alanina Transaminasa/efectos de los fármacos , Colangitis/enzimología , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/enzimología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapéutico
4.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 6(10): 1167-9, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18639498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is unusual in North American patients. This study characterized patients with NCPH and human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection to identify potential risk factors for this association. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients from our urban hepatology clinic with HIV-1 infection and NCPH were the subject of this series. Case histories, including medication lists and laboratory data, were analyzed. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis was 51 +/- 7 years. CD4 count was 303 +/- 185 cells/mL, and HIV viral load was <75 copies/mL in 9 patients. Didanosine was the only medication taken by all patients; 10 each had taken lamivudine and zidovudine. In the 10 patients tested, 8 had at least 1 thrombophilic abnormality; 6 were deficient in protein S, and 2 had multiple abnormalities. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia was observed in all 11 and portal venulopathy in 5 patients. All patients had esophageal varices; 3 developed variceal bleeding. Six patients had ascites; 2 required transjugular intrahepatic portal systemic shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to didanosine and/or a hypercoagulable tendency might predispose patients infected with HIV-1 to vascular changes resulting in NCPH.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/virología , VIH-1/aislamiento & purificación , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Didanosina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Trombofilia , Carga Viral , Zidovudina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...