Donor-Site Morbidity Following Free Fibula Flap Harvest for Mandibular or Maxillary Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients.

INTRO AND AIM: The morbidity at the donor-site in the free fibula flap is a well-studied fact in the adult population, but in children, there are few reports of the long-term adverse effects at the donor site. In this study, we evaluate donor-site morbidity, complications, and functional outcome in pediatric patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest for mandibular or maxillary reconstruction, and the relation between pain and walking abilities. METHODS: A retrospective study of 22 pediatric patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction between 2003 and 2014 was conducted. A certified point evaluation system was used, analyzing several factors like pain, walking ability, restriction in activities, gait alteration, paresthesia, and cosmetic appearance, and the relationship between variables. RESULTS: Mean age follow up of patient was 8.5 years (range 2-13 years). Pain was reported in 27% (n = 6), paresthesia and numbness 9% (n = 2), walking ability alteration in 50% (n = 11), restriction in activities in 18% (n = 4), gait alteration in 23% (n = 5), and cosmetic appearance alteration in the 14% (n = 3). We compare the pain and the gait alteration and did not find any relation between pain and gait alteration (P = 0.6016) and there was no relation between restriction in activities and walking ability (P = 0.1455). CONCLUSION: Free fibula flap is the gold standard for head and neck reconstruction, but the morbidity at the donor site, especially in a growing child, should not be ignored or minimized when counseling patients and their families.More studies, with more population and with a long-term follow-up should be carried out to determine the impact on the daily activities on the pediatric population.

Morbidity in Patients With Separation of Cartilaginous Framework: Temporoparietal Fascia Flap and Treatment With Dermal Regeneration Template.

BACKGROUND: The full creation of an ear requires 2 reconstruction stages. In the second stage of reconstruction, the cartilaginous framework placed at first stage is separated from the head creating an auriculocephalic sulcus. Then a piece of rib cartilage is placed in the sulcus to maintain this separation and is covered with tissue that allows the integration of a full-thickness skin graft. METHODS: A descriptive study based on the pre and postoperative medical records and photographic archives of patients diagnosed with microtia who underwent separation of the cartilaginous framework from February 2010 to July 2015 in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department at Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients met the selection criteria. The temporoparietal fascial flap was performed on 85% (n = 46), and 8 cases with random occipito-temporal fascial flap in association to a dermal regeneration template. The average time at the operating room was 177 minutes in patients with temporoparietal fascial flap versus 84.5 minutes in dermal regeneration template. The complication rate was 25.9% (n = 14), being similar rate with both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage with dermal regeneration template and random occipito-temporal fascia flap as an alternative use instead of temporoparietal fascial flaps, offers good postoperative results, lower operating times, and similar rate of complications, with the advantage of producing no visible scars and reserve the temporoparietal fascial flap for possible exposure of the cartilaginous framework.