Prognostic Score System Using Preoperative Inflammatory, Nutritional and Tumor Markers to Predict Prognosis for Gastric Cancer: A Two-Center Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory, nutritional and tumor markers and develop an effective prognostic score system to predict the prognosis of GC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1587 consecutive GC patients who received curative gastrectomy from two medical centers. A novel prognostic score system was proposed based on independently preoperative markers associated with overall survival (OS) of GC patients. A nomogram based on prognostic score system was further established and validated internally and externally. RESULTS: Based on multivariate analysis in the training set, a novel BLC (body mass index-lymphocyte-carbohydrate antigen 19-9) score system was proposed, which showed an effective predictability of OS in GC patients (log-rank P < 0.001). Moreover, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that BLC had better performance in predicting OS than the traditional prognostic markers. The C-index of the BLC based-nomogram was 0.710 (95% CI 0.686-0.734), and the areas under ROC curves for predicting 3- and 5-year OS were 0.781 (95% CI 0.750-0.813) and 0.755 (95% CI 0.723-0.786), respectively, which were higher than those of tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system alone. The calibration curve for probability of 3- and 5-year OS rate showed a good fitting effect between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Verification in the internal and external validation sets showed results consistent with those in the training set. CONCLUSIONS: The BLC combining inflammatory, nutritional and tumor markers was an independent prognostic predictor for GC patients, and the nomogram based on BLC could accurately predict the personalized survival of patients with GC.

Comparisons of perioperative and survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data about whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is applicable in serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer patients remain rare. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes between the laparoscopic and open gastrectomy (OG) in pT4a gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection. METHODS: A total of 1086 consecutive pT4a patients (101 patients with LG and 985 with OG) who underwent curative gastrectomy in a high-volume center between 2006 and 2016 were evaluated. Demographics, surgical, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance baseline confounders, and COX regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: After PSM adjustment, a well-balanced cohort comprising 101 patients who underwent LG and 201 who underwent OG was analyzed. Operative time (288.7 vs. 234.2 min; P < 0.001) was significantly longer, while estimated blood loss (172.8 vs. 220.7 ml; P < 0.001) was significantly less in the LG group compared with the OG group. There were no significant differences between groups in total number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative stays, readmission rate, and postoperative complication rate. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was not significant different in the LG and OG groups (66.7% vs. 62.8%, P = 0.668), and the subsequent multivariate analysis revealed that the surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.123; 95%CI: 0.803-1.570; P = 0.499). In sensitivity analysis including 78 pairs well-matched patients operated by an experienced surgeon, the results were similar to these for the matched entire cohort. CONCLUSION: LG can be a safe and feasible approach for pT4a gastric cancer treatment. However, well-designed high-quality RCTs are expected to draw a definitive conclusion on this topic.

Incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and its risk factors: a long-term retrospective cohort study from a high-volume institution in China.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) has a significant impact on quality of life and medical costs. However, data about ASBO after gastrectomy remain sparse. From January 2009 to December 2017, 3025 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Clinicopathological materials were obtained retrospectively, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for ASBO. A nomogram for the prediction of ASBO was generated using the results of multivariable analyses. Bootstraps with 1000 resamples were performed for internal validation. The performance of the model was assessed with its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. A total of 330 (10.9%) patients experienced at least one ASBO episode with a median follow-up of 57.0 (interquartile range 31.0-85.0) months. Logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors for ASBO were previous abdominal surgery (odds ratio, OR = 2.03), open gastrectomy (OR = 3.12), non-Billroth-1 reconstruction (Billroth-2, OR = 2.61; Roux-en-Y, OR = 1.99; esophagogastrostomy, OR = 2.79), D2/D2 + lymphadenectomy (OR = 2.64), combined organ resection (OR = 2.76), and postoperative intraabdominal complication (OR = 2.73). The nomogram showed good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.702 and good calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. Several risk factors associated with ASBO after gastrectomy for gastric cancer were identified. Nomogram generated based on these factors could serve as a reliable tool to predict the probability of ASBO.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography prevents anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of intraoperative use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL) in rectal cancer surgery remains controversial. METHODS: The systematic review for studies evaluating ICGFA in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to April 30, 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL. The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.3 and Stata v12.0 software. RESULTS: Eighteen studies comprising 4038 patients were included. In the present meta-analysis, intraoperative use of ICGFA markedly reduced AL rate (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%) in rectal cancer surgery, which was still significant in surgeries limited to symptomatic AL (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64; P < 0.0001; I2 = 22%). This intervention was also associated with shorter postoperative stays (MD = - 1.27; 95% CI: - 2.42 to - 0.13; P = 0.04; I2 = 60%). However, reoperation rate (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.34-1.10; P = 0.10; I2 = 6%), ileus rate (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.60-2.82; P = 0.51; I2 = 56%), and surgical site infection rate (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 0.62-3.20; P = 0.42; I2 = 0%) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of ICGFA was associated with a lower AL rate after rectal cancer resection. However, more multi-center RCTs with large sample size are required to further verify the value of ICGFA in rectal cancer surgery.

Is Preoperative Fibrinogen Associated with the Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients? A Multi-centered, Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of preoperative plasma fibrinogen in patients with operable gastric cancer remains under debate. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic value of fibrinogen in gastric cancer patients underwent gastrectomy. METHODS: A total of 4351 patients with gastric cancer collected from three comprehensive medical centers were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorized by minimum P value using X-tile, while the baseline confounders for fibrinogen was balanced through propensity score matching (PSM). The relationships between fibrinogen and other clinicopathologic features were evaluated, and nomogram was constructed to assess its prognostic improvement compared with TNM staging system. RESULTS: Fibrinogen was significantly correlated with macroscopic type, tumor differentiation, tumor size, and T and N stage. The factors, fibrinogen and T stage as well as N stage, were identified to be independent prognostic factors after PSM. Nomogram based on fibrinogen demonstrated a smaller Akaike information criterion (AIC) and a larger concordance index (C-index) than TNM staging system, illustrating that fibrinogen might be able to improve the prognostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels in gastric cancer patients were significantly correlated with tumor progression, which could be regarded as a reliable marker for survival prognostic prediction.