Longitudinal Cough Frequency Monitoring in Persistent Coughers: Daily Variability and Predictability.

PURPOSE: We determined the cough counts and their variability in subjects with persistent cough for 30 days. METHODS: The Hyfe cough tracker app uses the mobile phone microphone to monitor sounds and recognizes cough with artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms. We analyzed the daily cough counts including the daily predictability rates of 97 individuals who monitored their coughs over 30 days and had a daily cough rate of at least 5 coughs per hour. RESULTS: The mean (median) daily cough rates varied from 6.5 to 182 (6.2 to 160) coughs per hour, with standard deviations (interquartile ranges) varying from 0.99 to 124 (1.30 to 207) coughs per hour among all subjects. There was a positive association between cough rate and variability, as subjects with higher mean cough rates (OLS) have larger standard deviations. The accuracy of any given day for predicting all 30 days is the One Day Predictability for that day, defined as the percentage of days when cough frequencies fall within that day's 95% confidence interval. Overall Predictability was the mean of the 30-One Day Predictability percentages and ranged from 95% (best predictability) to 30% (least predictability). CONCLUSION: There is substantial within-day and day-to-day variability for each subject with persistent cough recorded over 30 days. If confirmed in future studies, the clinical significance and the impact on the use of cough counts as a primary end-point of cough interventions of this variability need to be assessed.

Performance evaluation of human cough annotators: optimal metrics and sex differences.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its high prevalence and significance, there is still no widely available method to quantify cough. In order to demonstrate agreement with the current gold standard of human annotation, emerging automated techniques require a robust, reproducible approach to annotation. We describe the extent to which a human annotator of cough sounds (a) agrees with herself (intralabeller or intrarater agreement) and (b) agrees with other independent labellers (interlabeller or inter-rater agreement); we go on to describe significant sex differences in cough sound length and epochs size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 24 participants wore an audiorecording smartwatch to capture 6-24 hours of continuous audio. A randomly selected sample of the whole audio was labelled twice by an expert annotator and a third time by six trained annotators. We collected 400 hours of audio and analysed 40 hours. The cough counts as well as cough seconds (any 1 s of time containing at least one cough) from different annotators were compared and summary statistics from linear and Bland-Altman analyses were used to quantify intraobserver and interobserver agreement. RESULTS: There was excellent intralabeller (less than two disagreements per hour monitored, Pearson's correlation 0.98) and interlabeller agreement (Pearson's correlation 0.96), using cough seconds as the unit of analysis decreased annotator discrepancies by 50% in comparison to coughs. Within this data set, it was observed that the length of cough sounds and epoch size (number of coughs per bout or attach) differed between women and men. CONCLUSION: Given the decreased interobserver variability in annotation when using cough seconds (vs just coughs) we propose their use for manually annotating cough when assessing of the performance of automatic cough monitoring systems. The differences in cough sound length and epochs size may have important implications for equality in the development of cough monitoring tools. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05042063.

Longitudinal passive cough monitoring and its implications for detecting changes in clinical status.

Research question: What is the impact of the duration of cough monitoring on its accuracy in detecting changes in the cough frequency? Materials and methods: This is a statistical analysis of a prospective cohort study. Participants were recruited in the city of Pamplona (Northern Spain), and their cough frequency was passively monitored using smartphone-based acoustic artificial intelligence software. Differences in cough frequency were compared using a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test and a randomisation routine to simulate 24-h monitoring. Results: 616 participants were monitored for an aggregated duration of over 9 person-years and registered 62 325 coughs. This empiric analysis found that an individual's cough patterns are stochastic, following a binomial distribution. When compared to continuous monitoring, limiting observation to 24 h can lead to inaccurate estimates of change in cough frequency, particularly in persons with low or small changes in rate. Interpretation: Detecting changes in an individual's rate of coughing is complicated by significant stochastic variability within and between days. Assessing change based solely on intermittent sampling, including 24-h, can be misleading. This is particularly problematic in detecting small changes in individuals who have a low rate and/or high variance in cough pattern.