The prevalence and perinatal repercussions of preeclampsia after the implementation of a prophylaxis protocol with aspirin.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and perinatal repercussions of preeclampsia (PE) after the implementation of a prophylaxis protocol with aspirin in singleton pregnancy at Maternity School of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2015-2106). METHODOLOGY: PE prevalence according to gestational age (GA) and the prevalence ratio (PR) between PE and prematurity, small for gestational age (SGA), and fetal death were calculated in patients assisted during 2015 and 2016. RESULTS: PE occurred in 373(10.75%) of 3468 investigated cases, where PE < 37 weeks was of 2.79% and PE greater than 37 weeks was of 7.95%. A total of 413 (11.9%) prematurity cases, 320 SGA (9.22%), and 50 fetal deaths (1.44%) occurred. In the PE group, 97 premature newborns (PR 0.90) and 51 SGA (PR 1.16) were born, and two fetal deaths occurred (PR 7.46). Concerning PE < 37 weeks, 27 SGA cases (PR 1.42) and two fetal deaths (PR 2.62) were observed. Regarding PE greater than 37 weeks, 24 SGA (PR 1.09) were born, and no fetal deaths were observed. Our findings were compared to previously published results. CONCLUSIONS: PE was significantly associated with SGA newborns, especially premature PE. Prescribing aspirin for PE prophylaxis based only on clinical risk factors in a real-life scenario does not appear to be effective but resulted in a PE screening and prophylaxis protocol review and update at ME/UFRJ.

External validation of first trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia in Brazil: An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a combined algorithm for early prediction of pre-eclampsia (PE) in the Brazilian population. STUDY DESIGN: This is an unplanned secondary analysis of a cohort study. Consecutive singleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester screening for PE involving examination of maternal characteristics, medical history, and biophysical markers were considered eligible. Women were classified as low-or high-risk using a cutoff of 1/200, but the individual risk was not used to dictate management, as aspirin prophylaxis was given to women based solely on clinical risk factors. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves for PE, preterm PE(PE < 37) and early 34(PE < 34) were constructed and detection rates(DR) and false-positive rates(FPR) were calculated, adjusting for the effect of aspirin. Propensity score analysis was utilized to account for possible confounding by indication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening performance and PE rates. RESULTS: Among 1695 women, 323(19.1%) were classified as high-risk for PE and 1372(80.9%) were considered low-risk. Aspirin use was registered in 62(3.7%) in the high-risk group and 33(1.9%) in the low-risk group. There were 164(9.7%) women who developed PE, including 41(2.4%) with PE < 37 and 18(1.1%) PE < 34.Subgroups with aspirin had higher incidence of PE, suggest confounding by indication. The algorithm had an AUC of 0.87, DR of 72% for PE < 34; an AUC of 0.8, DR of 59% for PE < 37, both with FPR of 18%. Accounting for effect of aspirin, we observed an improvement in DR of PE < 37 to 67%. CONCLUSION: Using combined predictive algorithm for preterm PE prediction is feasible in clinical practice in low/middle-income countries. Aspirin use needs to be accounted for when evaluating the performance of screening.