RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PaedCTAS) in adolescent patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: A time-series study was conducted in the Emergency Departments (EDs) of 17 public hospitals during the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant spread in Israel. Data were collected prospectively from June 11, 2021 to August 15, 2021. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent variables associated with hospital admission and with admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). RESULTS: During the study period, 305 SARS-CoV-2 patients ages 12-18 years presenting to the ED were included, and 267 (87.5%) were unvaccinated. Sixty-seven (22.0%) and 12 (3.9%) patients were admitted to pediatric wards and ICUs, respectively. PaedCTAS level 1-2 and the presence of chronic disease increased the odds of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.74, 95% CI, 2.30-14.35, p < 0.0001), and (aOR 2.9, 95% CI, 1.48-5.67, p < 0.02), respectively. PaedCTAS level 1-2 and respiratory symptoms on presentation to ED increased the odds of ICU admission (aOR 27.79; 95% CI, 3.85-176.91, p < 0.001), and (aOR 26.10; 95% CI, 4.47-172.63, p < 0.0001), respectively. PaedCTAS level 3-5 was found in 217/226 (96%) of the patients who were discharged home from the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that PaedCTAS level 1-2 was the strongest factor associated with hospital and ICU admission. Almost all the patients who were discharged home had PaedCTAS level 3-5. Study findings suggest good performance of the PaedCTAS in this cohort.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Triaje , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Canadá , Niño , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Israel/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
This multicenter, cross-sectional study provides evidence on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated emergency department visits and hospitalizations in pediatric wards and intensive care units after school reopening during the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant spread in Israel. Study findings suggest that school reopening was not followed by an increase in SARS-CoV-2-related pediatric morbidity.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Hospitalización , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the increased use of sedation in children undergoing stressful procedures, reduction of ileocolic intussusception (RII) is usually performed on awake children without any form of sedation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of severe complications of RII under sedation or anaesthesia. DESIGN: A systematic review including English language original articles of any date. PATIENTS: Children undergoing RII (pneumatic or hydrostatic) under sedation or anaesthesia. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Embase, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the internet search engine Google Scholar. DATA EXTRACTION: Three authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of intestinal perforation during RII. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of sentinel adverse events defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, permanent neurological deficit and pulmonary aspiration syndrome. RESULTS: The search yielded 368 articles. Nine studies with 1391 cases were included in the analysis. Of the nine studies, six had a score of ≤6 stars in the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment, indicating low-to-moderate quality. Propofol-based sedation was used in 849 (59.2%) cases; 5 (0.6%) had intestinal perforation. Intestinal perforation was not reported in patients who were sedated with other sedatives. One patient had pulmonary aspiration syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Although caution remains warranted, current data suggest that the incidence of severe complications due to RII under sedation or anaesthesia is low. Due to the lack of prospective data, it is difficult to ascertain the exact incidence of severe complications.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Perforación Intestinal , Intususcepción , Propofol , Niño , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/inducido químicamente , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Intususcepción/epidemiología , Propofol/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine the impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) rates in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 11 Israeli pediatric emergency departments (ED) was conducted. Children with T1D who attended the ED between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 were compared with those who attended the ED between March 1, 2019 and May 31, 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 150 and 154 children with T1D attended the EDs during the 3-month study periods in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Among patients with established T1D, DKA rates significantly increased in 2020 compared to 2019 [38/64 (59.3%) vs 31/74 (41.9%); p < 0.043]. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward a higher rate of DKA in patients with newly diagnosed T1D [46/86 (53.4%) vs 31/80 (38.7%); p = 0.063]. No differences were observed in the rates of severe DKA in 2020 compared to 2019 among patients with established T1D [10/64 (15.6%) vs 6/74 (8.1%); p = 0.184], and newly diagnosed T1D [16/86 (18.6%) vs 14/80 (17.5%); p = 0.858]. No differences were observed in the rates of intensive care unit admissions in 2020 compared to 2019 among patients with established T1D [14/64 (21.8%) vs 14/74 (18.9%); p = 0.672], and newly diagnosed T1D [26/86 (30.2%) vs 21/80 (26.2%); p = 0.977]. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of DKA in children with established T1D were observed during the first 3 months of the outbreak in Israel. The findings suggest that the severity of DKA at ED presentation in children with T1D was not influenced by the pandemic.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to compare the antipyretic effects of ibuprofen in febrile children with serious bacterial infections (SBI), and children with a presumed viral infection. METHODS: A prospective cross- sectional study was conducted in a pediatric Emergency department between October 2018 and March 2020 for children aged 3 months to 4 years with a rectal temperature ≥ 38.5 °C. Patients received 10 mg/kg of ibuprofen oral suspension. Rectal temperature was measured 60 and 120 min after administration. Laboratory and imaging evaluations were performed for each study participant in order to identify serious bacterial infection. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included, of which 18 were diagnosed with serious bacterial infections. There was no significant difference in age, fever at presentation and duration of fever between the groups. No significant difference was noted in body temperature reduction at 60 and 120 min after ibuprofen administration (1.09 ± 0.75 °C vs 0.89 ± 0.58 °C, mean difference -0.12 °C, 95% CI -0.54-0.15 °C; 1.85 ± 0.53 °C vs 1.78 ± 0.83 °C, mean difference - 0.07 °C, 95% CI -0.49-0.36 °C, in the SBI and non-SBI groups respectively). CONCLUSION: Fever response to Ibuprofen administration is not indicative of serious bacterial infections in children under 4 years of age. Larger prospective studies are required to define whether the lack of response to Ibuprofen has any impact on the management of febrile children.
Asunto(s)
Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Ibuprofeno/farmacología , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/normas , Antipiréticos/normas , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/normas , Masculino , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Virosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Virosis/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Background: The reporting rate of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by healthcare professionals is low. ADR interventional programs may improve the reporting rate by the medical team. Our literature search revealed that only a few interventional studies among the pediatric population have been published. Objective: We aimed to create an interventional program in order to improve the reporting rate of ADRs during the interventional period compared to the control period, detect which drugs frequently lead to ADRs and determine the most serious ADRs. Design: A 3-month prospective intervention study compared with one year prior to the intervention (control period). ADR data was also collected for the year following the study period. Healthcare professionals were encouraged to report ADRs and an ADR reporting system was created for them. Setting: Pediatric Division at Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), a tertiary care medical center. Results: The study population included 3,753 admitted patients with 1,323 prescriptions during the study period. During the period before the intervention was started, the ADR reporting rate was null. During the study period, 46 reports were collected: 46% from the general pediatric department, 26% from the pediatric neurology department, and 22% and 6% from the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units, respectively. Antiepileptic medications, IVIG, steroids and antibiotics were frequently reported to induce ADRs. Serious ADRs were also reported in 5 cases. One year of follow up after the intervention revealed a significant decline in the reporting rate. Conclusion: It is important to periodically encourage healthcare professionals to report any ADRs in order to increase knowledge about medication safety and prevent fatal harm.