Will lobeglitazone rival pioglitazone? A systematic review and critical appraisal.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lobeglitazone (LGZ), a newly researched thiazolidinedione (TZD) thought to have lesser side effects compared with pioglitazone (PGZ), has been recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in India. We aim to conduct an updated systematic review of LGZ to critically appraise its efficacy and safety in the context of PGZ. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in the electronic database of PubMed until Jan 15, 2023, using specific keywords and MeSH terms. All studies which evaluated LGZ in people with T2D were retrieved and data were synthesized with regard to its efficacy and safety. A comparative critical appraisal was additionally made in the context of PGZ in T2D. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled, one prospective observational, and two real-world studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of LGZ against placebo or active comparators either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. HbA1c reduction with LGZ 0.5 mg was superior to the placebo but similar to PGZ 15 mg and sitagliptin (SITA) 100 mg. Weight gain with LGZ was significantly higher compared to placebo and SITA but similar to PGZ. Edema was more frequently observed with LGZ compared to placebo, PGZ, and SITA. CONCLUSION: No substantial evidence is yet available that suggests LGZ could be a better alternative to PGZ both in the context of glycemic or extra-glycemic effects. At least in the short-term, adverse events of LGZ are indifferent from PGZ. More data is additionally needed to claim any advantage of LGZ over PGZ.

Discharge Planning for People with Inpatient Hyperglycaemia: A Review on Pharmacological Management.

Inadequate glycaemic control post-discharge is the root cause of readmission in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and is often linked to improper discharge planning (DP). A structured DP plays a crucial role in ensuring continuing home care and avoiding readmissions. DP should help patients in self-care and provide appropriate guidance to maintain optimal glycaemic control. There is a scarcity of reports and recommendations on the proper DP for people with DM on insulin therapy. The present review provides important consideration based on experts' opinions from the National Insulin and Incretin summit (NIIS), focusing on the effective treatment strategies at the time of discharge, especially for insulin therapy. A review of literature from PubMed and Embase was conducted. The consensus was derived, and recommendations were made on effective DP for patients with DM. Recommendations were drawn at the NIIS for post-discharge treatment for medical and surgical cases, stress-induced hyperglycaemia, elderly, pregnant women, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. The committee also recommended a comprehensive checklist to assist the physicians during discharge.

Expert Opinion: Optimum Clinical Approach to Combination-Use of SGLT2i + DPP4i in the Indian Diabetes Setting.

The Asian-Indian phenotype of type 2 diabetes mellitus is uniquely characterized for cardio-metabolic risk. In the context of implementing patient-centric holistic cardio-metabolic risk management as a priority, the choice of various combinations of antidiabetic agents should be individualized. Combined therapy with two classes of antidiabetic agents, namely, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, target several pathophysiological pathways. The wide-ranging clinical outcomes associated with this combination, including improvement of glycemia and adiposity, reduction of metabolic and vascular risk, safety, and simplicity for sustainable compliance, are extremely relevant to the Asian Indian patient population living with T2DM. In this review we describe the available evidence in detail and present a rational practical guidance for the optimum clinical use of this combination in this patient population.

Assessing prevalence and predictors of depression in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients - The DEPDIAB study.

OBJECTIVES: Depression is common in diabetes and has significant impact on health outcomes. Suicidal ideation also forms a part of the spectrum of diabetes and coexistent depression. To assess the predictors of depression as well as its prevalence in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients, we conducted a cross sectional study entitled "DEPression in DIABetes" (DEPDIAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of consecutive 1371 T2DM patients from Eastern India suffering from diabetes greater than 1 year was assessed in a cross- sectional survey in 9 different hospitals and medical polyclinics in Kolkata, India for depression by administering the 9-item PHQ - 9 and Beck depression scales. Socioeconomic status was assessed by the "Revised Kuppuswamy and B G Prasad socio-economic scales for 2016", a validated scoring system for assessing the socioeconomic status of Indian patients. RESULTS: In our study 836 patients (60.9%) were male and 535 (39.02%) were female. 56 patients (4.1%) met the criteria for major depression and 494 patients (36.16%) for minor depression. No sign of depression was found in 816 patients (59.74%). Depression was strongly associated with younger age (18-40 years vs. >60 years) [OR-2.09; 95% CI 1.11-3.96], female sex [OR-1.31; 95% CI 1.11-2.01], low socioeconomic status [OR-2.69; 95% CI 1.34-3.79], poor compliance [OR- 5.05; 95% CI 2.79-8.13], hypoglycemia [OR 1.466; 95% CI 1.076-1.999] and difficulty in managing day-to-day activities [OR- 4.648; 95% CI 3.450-6.262] Suicidal ideation was detected in 201 patients (14.8%). Among patients who had repeated attacks of hypoglycemia (>1 episode per month), 22% experienced suicidal ideation. This was significantly higher than in patients who had not suffered from hypoglycemia (12%) (p < 0.0001). Patients with HbA1C of 7% or lower experienced statistically significantly lesser suicidal ideation than patients with a higher HbA1C (12% vs. 16.8% {p = 0.016}). Suicidal ideation did not correlate withbody mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or insulin usage. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of depression in T2DM patients in Eastern India. Younger age, female sex, lower socio-economic status, poor compliance, hypoglycemia, and difficulty in managing day to day activities emerged as significant predictors of depression in this study. Recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia were an independent risk factor for suicidal ideation in patients with depression. Depression was not significantly associated with co morbidities associated with T2D and surprisingly insulin usage was not associated with increased depression.

Cardiometabolic vigilance in COVID-19 and resource husbandry in resource-challenged times: Clinical practice- based expert opinion.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is rapidly evolving, thereby posing a profound challenge to the global healthcare system. Cardiometabolic disorders are associated with poor clinical outcomes in persons with COVID-19. Healthcare challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic are linked to resource constraints including shortage of Personal Protective Equipment's (PPE), laboratory tests and medication. In this context, a group of clinical experts discussed the endocrine and cardiology vigilance required in times of COVID-19. Further, the group proposed certain resource husbandry recommendations to be followed during the pandemic to overcome the constraints. METHOD: The clinical experts discussed and provided their inputs virtually. The expert panel included clinical experts comprising endocrinologists, Consultant Physicians and cardiologists from India. The panel thoroughly reviewed existing literature on the subject and proposed expert opinion. RESULTS: The expert panel put forward clinical practice-based opinion for the management of cardiometabolic conditions including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. As these conditions are associated with poor clinical outcomes, the expert panel recommends that these persons be extra-cautious and take necessary precautions during the ongoing pandemic. Further, experts also provided appropriate, affordable, available and accessible solution to the resource constraint situations in times of COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: The clinical expert opinion put forward in this article will serve as a reference for clinicians treating diabetes and cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Compliance of the Indian National Task Force guidelines for COVID-19 recommendation by Indian doctors - A survey".

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic unravels rapidly, there is a glut of confusing and divergent scientific information emanating from differing sources, including the Indian National Task Force for COVID-19. Thus, a web-based survey was conducted to decipher the approach of Indian doctors to the various options for treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire among one lakh doctors across India through email and social media was circulated. After data quality and internal validation, 826 responses were included for analysis. Basic demographic and comparative analysis were performed using the Python3.8.2 software (Windows 10 64 bit, USA). RESULTS: Amongst all the states of India most respondents hailed from the top ten affected states. Overall 76.15% of doctors would either prescribe or consider prescribing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as prophylaxis for health-care providers (HCP). Doctors with experience of managing COVID-19 were more likely to advocate use of HCQ as prophylaxis for HCP (χ2 = 4.357, P = 0.037). Intensivists were more likely to advocate HCQ as prophylaxis (χ2 = 14.588, P < 0.001) as well as for management of mild to moderate COVID-19 (χ2 = 3.91, P = 0.048). In COVID-19, 65.8% doctors overwhelmingly preferred using anti-viral agents in severe cases, continuing ACEi/ARB (60.9%), and routinely screening for COVID-19 as a pre-operative strategy (73.85%). CONCLUSIONS: Indian doctors are largely following the scientific guidance provided by Indian National Task Force for COVID-19 and would consider prescribing HCQ as prophylaxis for COVID-19. They would also consider using it in mild to moderate COVID-19.

Risk of acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials.

BACKGROUND: The link of acute pancreatitis (AP) with Incretin based therapies (IBTs) in type 2 diabetes has existed since United States Food and Drug Administration alert in 2010. This issue still remains unresolved due to conflicting results among studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until 31 July 2019, and retrieved all cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of IBTs conducted for ≥12 months that reported the pre-specified and or pre-adjudicated pancreatitis outcomes. Subsequently, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the risk of AP observed with IBT in CVOTs. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of seven CVOTs of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) compared with placebo (N = 55,932) found no significant increase in AP (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.42; p = 0.77). In contrast, meta-analysis of five CVOTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors with placebo (N = 47,714) and six CVOTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors with placebo or active comparator (N = 53,747), found a significant increase (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.21-2.70; p = 0.04 and OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.18; p = 0.02, respectively) in AP without any significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed a significant association between pancreatitis and DPP-4 inhibitors; however, no such association was observed for GLP-1RAs.

Management of asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) consensus statement.

AIM: The definition and management of asymptomatic hyperuricemia has been an area of controversy for many decades. Debate persists regarding the benefit of treating all cases of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and hence, unsurprisingly there are no clear clinical practice guidelines from our country. PARTICIPANTS: Ten members consisting of eminent physicians, endocrinologists, nephrologist and a rheumatologist were selected by the Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) for a closed meeting with the aim to come to a consensus. EVIDENCE: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane library following which published articles in indexed peer review journals were selected. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Each participant voiced their opinion after reviewing the available data and a consensus was reached after three meetings by voting. CONCLUSION: Recommendations were made on important areas such as definition, investigation and management of asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

A Practitioner's Toolkit for Insulin Motivation in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence-Based Recommendations from an International Expert Panel.

AIM: To develop an evidence-based expert group opinion on the role of insulin motivation to overcome insulin distress during different stages of insulin therapy and to propose a practitioner's toolkit for insulin motivation in the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). BACKGROUND: Insulin distress, an emotional response of the patient to the suggested use of insulin, acts as a major barrier to insulin therapy in the management of DM. Addressing patient-, physician- and drug-related factors is important to overcome insulin distress. Strengthening of communication between physicians and patients with diabetes and enhancing the patients' coping skills are prerequisites to create a sense of comfort with the use of insulin. Insulin motivation is key to achieving targeted goals in diabetes care. A group of endocrinologists came together at an international meeting held in India to develop tool kits that would aid a practitioner in implementing insulin motivation strategies at different stages of the journey through insulin therapy, including pre-initiation, initiation, titration and intensification. During the meeting, emphasis was placed on the challenges and limitations faced by both physicians and patients with diabetes during each stage of the journey through insulinization. REVIEW RESULTS: After review of evidence and discussions, the expert group provided recommendations on strategies for improved insulin acceptance, empowering behavior change in patients with DM, approaches for motivating patients to initiate and maintain insulin therapy and best practices for insulin motivation at the pre-initiation, initiation, titration and intensification stages of insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of DM, bringing in positive behavioral change by motivating the patient to improve treatment adherence helps overcome insulin distress and achieve treatment goals.

Dome-Shaped Pituitary Enlargement in Primary Hypothyroidism: Avoiding Neurosurgical Interventions.

We describe three cases of primary hypothyroidism which presented initially to neurosurgery department with pituitary hyperplasia. We have found a novel pattern of 'dome-shaped' enlargement of pituitary in MRI of these patients. Out of these 3 patients, in two of them, the planned surgery was deferred when endocrinologists were consulted and the pituitary hyperplasia completely resolved with levothyroxine treatment. In the third case, pituitary surgery was already performed before endocrinology consultation and histopathology revealed thyrotroph hyperplasia. The hyperplastic lesions described typically have a homogenous symmetrical 'dome' shaped architecture unlike the non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA), which usually might often be of varying shapes and homogeneity. Analysis of pituitary images from similar case reports published in literature, also showed this typical 'dome' shaped pituitary enlargement. This imaging characteristic can be a clue to look for underlying hormone deficiency, especially in primary hypothyroidism. Therefore, a thorough endocrine evaluation especially looking for primary hypothyroidism in such dome-shaped pituitary lesions are mandatory to prevent unwarranted neuro-surgical intervention as treatment of primary hypothyroidism may result in resolution of the abnormal enlargement.

Evidence-Based Consensus on Positioning of SGLT2i in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Indians.

The current diabetes management strategies not only aim at controlling glycaemic parameters but also necessitate continuous medical care along with multifactorial risk reduction through a comprehensive management concept. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a group of evolving antidiabetic agents that have the potential to play a pivotal role in the comprehensive management of patients with diabetes due to their diverse beneficial effects. SGLT2i provide moderate glycaemic control, considerable body weight and blood pressure reduction, and thus have the ability to lower the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. Some of the unique characteristics associated with SGLT2i, such as reduction in body weight (more visceral fat mass loss than subcutaneous fat loss), reduction in insulin resistance and improvement in ß-cell function, as measured by homeostatic model assessment-ß (HOMA-ß) could be potentially beneficial and help in overcoming some of the challenges faced by Indian patients with diabetes. In addition, a patient-centric approach with individualised treatment during SGLT2i therapy is inevitable in order to reduce diabetic complications and improve quality of life. Despite their broad benefits profile, the risk of genital tract infections, volume depletion, amputations and diabetic ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2i should be carefully monitored. In this compendium, we systematically reviewed the literature from Medline, Cochrane Library, and other relevant databases and attempted to provide evidence-based recommendations for the positioning of SGLT2i in the management of diabetes in the Indian population.Funding: AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited.

Consensus on "Basal insulin in the management of Type 2 Diabetes: Which, When and How?"

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has attained epidemic proportions and continues to increase despite the availability of a number of oral antidiabetic medications and major advances made in insulin delivery since its discovery nearly a hundred years ago. One, amongst many other reasons responsible for the inability to achieve adequate glycaemic control in a substantial proportion of T2DM patients is the delayed initiation and inappropriate intensification of insulin treatment. Appropriate initiation and intensification of insulin is critical for the successful achievement of tight glycaemic control. OBJECTIVE: To provide simple and easily implementable guidelines to primary care physicians on basal insulin initiation and intensification, along with use of basal insulin in special situations (hepatic failure, renal failure and gestational diabetes mellitus). METHODS: Each consensus statement on basal insulin initiation, intensification and use of basal insulin in special situations was evaluated for dosing and titration based on established guidelines, data from approved pack inserts, prescribing information or summary of product characteristics for each insulin type, and published scientific literature. These evaluations were then factored into the national context based not only on the clinical experience of the expert committee representatives' but also based on the common therapeutic practices followed in India to successfully achieve optimal glucose control. RESULTS: Recommendations on initiation and intensification of basal insulin, and its use in special situations, have been developed. The key recommendations are to initiate basal insulin when 2 or 3 oral antidiabetic medications fail to achieve target glycaemic control, or in symptomatic patients with glycated haemoglobin value greater than 9%. Depending upon patient characteristics, any of the four available basal insulins [Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), Glargine (IGlar), Detemir (IDet), Degludec (IDeg)] can be used. However, IDeg has a longer duration of action, comparatively lesser hypoglycaemia (both overall and nocturnal) and more flexibility in administration timing compared to IGlar) and IDet. Inability to maintain glycaemic control should lead to prompt intensification of basal insulin treatment by adding mealtime insulin, consisting of one to three injections of either rapid-acting insulin analog or regular insulin; depending upon patient characteristics, intensification can also be achieved by transition from basal insulin to twice daily premixed insulin analogs/premixed human insulin/insulin co-formulations. IDeg/IDet can be used in all grades of renal and hepatic impairment; and IDet has been approved for use in gestational diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: We hope that these consensus based recommendations shall be a useful reference tool for health care practitioners and help them in initiating and intensifying insulin therapy in T2DM patients in order to achieve optimal glycaemic control.

Consensus on Use of Insulins in Gestational Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), diabetes diagnosed during pregnancy is associated with maternal (caesarean delivery, hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, shoulder dystocia, pre-term delivery and birth trauma) and fetal (Hyperbilirubinaemia in offspring, Neonatal hypoglycaemia, Macrosomia) complications. Despite, insulin being the standard treatment for GDM cases, there is no existing comprehensive consensus update on use of insulin in Indian patients with GDM. OBJECTIVE: To provide simple and easily implementable guidelines to healthcare physicians on use of insulin in GDM. METHODS: Each consensus based on indications, choice of insulin regimen , titration and insulin therapy during intrapartum and postpartum was presented based on established guidelines and published scientific literature. These evaluations were then factored into the national context based on the expert committee representatives' patient-physician experience in their clinical practice and common therapeutic practices followed in India for successful GDM management. RESULTS: Recommendations based on use of insulin in GDM has been developed. The key recommendations are:to monitor fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour post prandial glucose PPG levels and the glycaemic targets are: FPG < 95 mg/dL and 2-hour PPG < 120 mg/dL, short-and intermediate acting human insulin are the first choice of insulin regimens, rapid-acting (Insulin Aspart or Lispro) may be considered, use basal/intermediate acting insulin at bedtime, if FPG>110 mg/dL. During intrapartum, start IV insulin infusion with hourly glucose monitoring. Those women who require insulin < 20 U over 24 hours prior to labor may not need interpartum use of insulin infusion and Insulin dosing is stopped after birth and capillary glucose monitoring for 24-48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: We hope that the consensus based recommendations mentioned in this paper will be a useful reference tool for healthcare practitioners to achieve glycaemic targets in GDM patients.

Consensus Statement on Dose Modifications of Antidiabetic Agents in Patients with Hepatic Impairment.

Liver disease is an important cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It is estimated that diabetes is the most common cause of liver disease in the United States. Virtually, entire spectrum of liver disease is seen in T2DM including abnormal liver enzymes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and acute liver failure. The treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) in cirrhotic patients has particular challenges as follows: (1) about half the patients have malnutrition; (2) patients already have advanced liver disease when clinical DM is diagnosed; (3) most of the oral antidiabetic agents (ADAs) are metabolized in the liver; (4) patients often have episodes of hypoglycemia. The aim of this consensus group convened during the National Insulin Summit 2015, Puducherry, was to focus on the challenges with glycemic management, with particular emphasis to safety of ADAs across stages of liver dysfunction. Published literature, product labels, and major clinical guidelines were reviewed and summarized. The drug classes included are biguanides (metformin), the second- or third-generation sulfonylureas, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and currently available insulins. Consensus recommendations have been drafted for glycemic targets and dose modifications of all ADAs. These can aid clinicians in managing patients with diabetes and liver disease.

Insulin glargine versus insulin degludec in patients failing on oral therapy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective real world comparative data from India.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the changes in various glycemic parameters in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients who were initiated on insulin glargine or insulin degludec in a real world setting. METHODS: Retrospective data were analyzed in consecutive type 2 DM patients in a real world setting, who failed oral therapy (at least 2 oral anti-diabetic drugs) and were initiated with either insulin glargine or insulin degludec. The parameters assessed were the changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, dose of Insulin and the total number of patient reported hypoglycemic episodes up to 6 months after initiation. RESULT: At baseline, insulin glargine and insulin degludec groups were similar in terms of gender, age, weight, HbA1c and duration of diabetes. After 6 months follow up the change in HbA1c (-1.09 versus -1.45 P=0.124), change in FPG (-72.81mg/dl [-4mmol/L] versus -75.88mg/dl [-4.2mmol/L] P=0.755), and the change in body weight (+1.65 versus +0.85 P=0.082) were similar in glargine and degludec groups, respectively. Patients in insulin degludec group experienced significantly lesser patient reported hypoglycemic episodes (12 versus 40) and required significantly lesser dose (25.68Units versus 18.61Units per day; P=0.002) compared to insulin glargine. 41% of the patients reached HbA1C target of ≤7% with insulin glargine compared to 69% with insulin degludec within the specified time period. CONCLUSION: Results from this real world analysis suggest that among type 2 DM patients who were initiated on insulin degludec as compared to insulin glargine may be associated with significantly lesser patient reported hypoglycemic episodes and lesser dose of insulin while achieving similar glycemic control. This study is however limited by the retrospective nature of the data collection.

Modern basal insulin analogs: An incomplete story.

The currently available basal insulin does not completely mimic the endogenous insulin secretion. This has continued to promote the search for ideal basal insulin. The newer basal insulin have primarily focused on increasing the duration of action, reducing variability, and reducing the incidence of hypoglycemia, particularly nocturnal. However, the changing criteria of hypoglycemia within a short span of a few years along with the surprising introduction of major cardiac events as another outcome measure has not only clouded the assessment of basal insulin but has also polarized opinion worldwide about the utility of the newer basal insulin. A critical review of both the pre and post FDA analysis of all the basal insulin in this article attempts to clear some of the confusion surrounding the issues of hypoglycemia and glycemic control. This article also discusses all the trials and meta-analysis done on all the current basal insulin available along with their head-to-head comparison with particular attention to glycemic control and hypoglycemic events including severe and nocturnal hypoglycemia. This in-depth analysis hopes to provide a clear interpretation of the various analyses available in literature at this point of time thereby acting as an excellent guide to the readers in choosing the most appropriate basal insulin for their patient.

Is insulin degludec a more effective treatment for patients using high doses of insulin glargine but not attaining euglycemia? Some case reports from India.

Insulin therapy is not without side effects. In patients with complications on complex regimens, failure to attain adequate glycemic control exposes the patient to high risks and the considerable mental distress associated with failed injectable therapy. As clinicians, we felt it necessary to undertake a trial of newer therapies like insulin degludec, which according to published literature, appears to be superior to earlier basal analogs by fewer hypoglycemic episodes, better glycemic predictability, and genuine 24-hour coverage. Here we report on three cases seen in our own clinical practice where insulin degludec was used in patients experiencing inadequacies with their current basal insulin therapy (insulin glargine). Switching to insulin degludec resulted in clinically meaningful reductions in hypoglycemia, along with reduced fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin and improved satisfaction with treatment. We also explored the use of long-acting insulin in renal failure and the possibility of dose reduction when switching from existing basal insulin therapy.