RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the educational impact of integrated haptic feedback in an immersive VR bone drilling simulation on the performance of a cohort of junior surgeons. Design: Block randomised, controlled, double-blinded study. Setting: St Georges University Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Participants: and methods: 31 trainee doctors (postgraduate years 1-3) with limited orthopaedic experience were recruited to participate in this randomised controlled study through e-mail and poster advertising. They were allocated to haptic or non-haptic group through block randomisation prior to entering the study environment. All participants provided verbal and written consent to participate in this study. All participants were blinded to the nature of the study as well as its intervention arms. All participants completed an immersive virtual reality training module with either haptic feedback or no haptic feedback in which they had to drill 3 bicortical holes in a VR tibia bone model in preparation for screw insertion followed by an ex vivo equivalent task on a tibial sawbone model once again drilling 3 holes through both cortices of the tibia. Outcome measures were plunge gap distance, drilling time and objective structures assessment of technical skills (OSAT) as well as qualitative questionnaire outcomes. Results: Haptic feedback in the VR training module showed significantly less plunge gap distance compared to the non-haptic group (7.6 mm ± 4.3 vs 13.6 mm ± 7.4 (p = 0.012)). The haptic group also had longer drill times (17.5 s ± 4.0 vs 13.8 s ± 4.2 (p = 0.027)), higher combined OSAT cores (14 (10,17) vs 8.5 (7.75, 12), p = 0.0006) and greater number of safe drills of <5 mm plunge gap in at least 2 out of 3 attempts (6 (40) vs 0 (0), p = 0.021. Conclusions: This study demonstrates better performance for an orthopaedic surgical task when using a VR-based simulation model incorporating haptic feedback, compared to one without haptic feedback supporting the pursuit and implementation of haptics in surgical training simulation models to enhance their educational value.
RESUMEN
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: The benefits of measuring PCT in the Emergency Department (ED) are not yet fully characterised.PCT is widely used in the intensive care setting to guide antimicrobial prescribing. WHAT THIS ADDS?: Measurement of PCT as a routine in the emergency department for all patients treated for possible sepsis identifies a high-risk cohort. KEY IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENT CARE: A PCT measurement of >0.2ug/L in the Emergency Department identifies a patient at increased risk of deterioration and of in-hospital death. BACKGROUND: Early recognition and management of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED) is a clinical challenge. Our aim was to determine if measuring the biomarker PCT in patients with suspected sepsis enables the identification of patients at increased risk of deterioration or in-hospital death in the ED setting of a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on all patients aged 18 and over presenting to ED fulfilling NICE criteria for moderate to high risk of sepsis admitted to hospital. Patients had a PCT test alongside the sepsis six protocol. PCT was measured using Brahms's chemiluminescent micro particle assay (CMIA) for the quantitative determination of PCT in human serum and plasma on the Abbott Alinity I analytical platform. The cost per test was approximately 13 GBP.The analysis was performed on patients having a PCT in ED over a 7-month period, with in-depth scrutiny of an appropriate subgroup. A high level quality improvement (QI) approach was used in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1242 patients were included in the study. Mean/median age was 67.9/72, (range 18-102). 88.7% of deaths occurred in patients over 65 years of age. 42.4% (n=532) had a PCT level in ED of >0.2 ug/L. This identified a high risk group with a 2.4 fold increase in mortality rate (7.7%:18.2% p value <0.001). The median length of stay (LOS) was 5 (IQR 9) and 8 days (IQR 11) in patients with a first PCT of ≤0.2 ug/L versus >0.2 ug/L respectively. CONCLUSION: An immediate PCT on patients presenting to ED with signs of sepsis in a non-specialised acute trust identifies those patients at an increased risk of deterioration and in hospital death.
