Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nefrología (Madrid) ; 42(5): 585-593, sept.-oct. 2022. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-211256

RESUMEN

Introducción: La hemodiálisis domiciliaria (HDD) está especialmente implementada en la Comunidad Valenciana en comparación con el resto del territorio nacional, con una prevalencia de 13,4 pacientes pmp a diciembre de 2018. Realizamos una valoración de las características de los pacientes y de la supervivencia global y técnica del paciente en HDD en función del momento histórico de inicio y de su procedencia. Material y métodos: Pacientes incluidos en el Registro de Enfermos Renales de la Comunidad Valenciana desde que se reportan datos al mismo hasta diciembre de 2020. Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo, calculando supervivencia global (evento combinado muerte-fallo técnico, censurando trasplante) y supervivencia técnica (evento fallo técnico, censurando muerte y trasplante). Comparamos la supervivencia de la técnica en función de era de inicio: antigua (1976-2000) vs. moderna (2001-2020), y en función de la modalidad de procedencia. Realizamos regresión de Cox uni- y multivariante en el total de la serie tanto para supervivencia global como técnica. (AU)


Introduction: Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients’ pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients’ characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976–2000) vs modern (2001–2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survivals. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio , Supervivencia , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Peritoneal , Prevalencia
2.
J Thyroid Res ; 2022: 1077553, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35620417

RESUMEN

Introduction: Renal function and thyroid metabolism are tightly related. However, evidence about subclinical hypothyroidism prevalence in patients with chronic kidney disease and its related factors is scarce. Objectives: Our aim is to analyze subclinical hypothyroidism prevalence and its related factors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Materials and methods. Nondialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease at stages 3 to 5 were included. Other inclusion criteria were age above 18 years and clinical stability. Patients with diagnosed thyroid illnesses were excluded. Subclinical hypothyroidism was defined as thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) > 5.3 mU/L, with free thyroxine 4 (FT4) between 0.54 and 1.24 ng/dl. Filiation data, comorbidities, and routine blood and urine test results were registered. Results: A total of 299 patients were included. Of them, 184 (61.5%) were men. The mean age was 71 ± 13 years old. The mean glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI) was 22 ± 9 ml/min/1.73 m2. According to chronic kidney disease stages, global distribution of patients was as follows: Stage 3, 67 patients (22.4%); Stage 4, 155 patients (51.8%); and Stage 5, 77 patients (25.8%). We found subclinical hypothyroidism in 54 (18.1%) patients. According to chronic kidney disease stages, distribution of affected patients was as follows: Stage 3, 9 patients (13%); Stage 4, 25 patients (16.1%); and Stage 5, 20 patients (26%). Differences among stages were statistically significant. By univariate analysis, factors related with subclinical hypothyroidism were as follows: age RR 1.048 (95% CI 1.019-1.078; p=0.001), hypertension RR 2.705 (95% CI 1.026-7.130; p=0.04), glomerular filtration rate RR 0.962 (95% CI 0.929-0.996; p=0.03), and proteinuria higher than 1 gram/day RR 2.387 (95% CI 1.303-4.374; p=0.005). By multivariate analysis adjusted by age, hypertension, glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease history, only age RR 1.016 (95% CI 1.009-1.028; p=0.04) and glomerular filtration rate RR 0.963 (95% CI 0.930-0.997; p=0.03) preserved their independent association with subclinical hypothyroidism. Conclusions: Subclinical hypothyroidism prevalence in patients with chronic kidney disease is high and increases with renal disease severity. Factors independently related to subclinical hypothyroidism are age and glomerular filtration rate.

3.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 42(5): 585-593, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697297

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976-2000) vs modern (2001-2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survival. RESULTS: 236 patients on HDD (611.4 patient-years of follow-up), mean age 49.7±16.3 years; median time of prior renal replacement therapy 0.2 years. The ratio of transplantation, death, and technical failure were 13.2, 4.4, and 7 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. In the comparison by ancient (n=57) vs modern (n=179) eras, age (37.5 vs 53.5 years), DM (3.5 vs 13.4%) and chronic tubuleinterstitial nephropathy (24.6 vs 8.9%) as a cause of chronic kidney disease were statistically significant. The probability of coming from outpatient consultation (33.3 vs 48.6%) and peritoneal dialysis (1.8 vs 12.8%) were higher in modern era with statistical significance. In the ancient era a single hospital centralized 57.9% of the patients, and in the modern era between two hospitals centralized 55.8% of the patients. Overall survival in the ancient era was 83.7% at 1year, 77.4% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years; and in the modern era 87.3% per year, 83% 2 years and 47.8% 5 years (Log Rank 0.521). Technical survival in the ancient era was 85.4% at 1year, 79% 2 years, and 64.1% 5 years; and in the modern era 91.4% per year, 88.5% 2 years and 74.5% 5 years (Log Rank 0.195). There were no statistical differences in the comparison based on technical of provenance. In the Cox regression it was statistically significant for overall survival: the age and being diagnosed with heart disease, vascular disease or active neoplasia and for technical survival liver disease or social problem, both in univariate and multivariate. CONCLUSIONS: In the modern era there is a considerable increase in HDD patients in the Valencian Community. There was a center effect in the development of HDD programs, most of the patients depended on few healthcare centers. The patients were older and had greater comorbidity in the modern era, despite this without affecting the technical and overall survival of the HDD.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad
4.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 2021 Sep 20.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34556353

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients' pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients' characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976-2000) vs modern (2001-2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survivals. RESULTS: 236 patients on HDD (611.4 patient-years of follow-up), mean age 49.7±16.3 years; median time of prior renal replacement therapy 0.2 years. The ratio of transplantation, death, and technical failure were 13.2, 4.4, and 7 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. In the comparison by ancient (n=57) vs modern (n=179) eras, age (37.5 vs 53.5 years), DM (3.5 vs 13.4%) and chronic tubuleinterstitial nephropathy (24.6 vs 8.9%) as a cause of chronic kidney disease were statistically significant. The probability of coming from outpatient consultation (33.3 vs 48.6%) and peritoneal dialysis (1.8 vs 12.8%) were higher in modern era with statistical significance. In the ancient era a single hospital centralized 57.9% of the patients, and in the modern era between two hospitals centralized 55.8% of the patients. Overall survival in the ancient era was 83.7% at 1 year, 77.4% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years; and in the modern era 87.3% per year, 83% 2 years and 47.8% 5 years (Log Rank 0.521). Technical survival in the ancient era was 85.4% at 1 year, 79% 2 years, and 64.1% 5 years; and in the modern era 91.4% per year, 88.5% 2 years and 74.5% 5 years (Log Rank 0.195). There were no statistical differences in the comparison based on technical of provenance. In the Cox regression it was statistically significant for overall survival: the age and being diagnosed with heart disease, vascular disease or active neoplasia and for technical survival liver disease or social problem, both in univariate and multivariate. CONCLUSION: In the modern era there is a considerable increase in HDD patients in the Valencian Community. There was a center effect in the development of HDD programs, most of the patients depended on few healthcare centers. The patients were older and had greater comorbidity in the modern era, despite this without affecting the technical and overall survival of the HDD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...