Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Neurocrit Care ; 39(2): 411-418, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36869209

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individual extracerebral organ dysfunction is common after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and impacts outcomes. However, multiorgan failure (MOF) has received less attention in patients with isolated TBI. Our objective was to analyze the risk factors associated with the development of MOF and its impact in clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, multicenter study using data from a nationwide registry that currently includes 52 intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain (RETRAUCI). Isolated significant TBI was defined as Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 in the head area with no AIS ≥ 3 in any other anatomical area. Multiorgan failure was defined using the Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment as the alteration of two or more organs with a score of ≥ 3. We analyzed the contribution of MOF to crude and adjusted mortality (age and AIS head) by using logistic regression analysis. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors associated with the development of MOF in patients with isolated TBI. RESULTS: A total of 9790 patients with trauma were admitted to the participating ICUs. Of them, 2964 (30.2%) had AIS head ≥ 3 and no AIS ≥ 3 in any other anatomical area, and these patients constituted the study cohort. Mean age was 54.7 (19.5) years, 76% of patients were men, and ground-level falls were the main mechanism of injury (49.1%). In-hospital mortality was 22.2%. Up to 185 patients with TBI (6.2%) developed MOF during their ICU stay. Crude and adjusted (age and AIS head) mortality was higher in patients who developed MOF (odds ratio 6.28 [95% confidence interval 4.58-8.60] and odds ratio 5.20 [95% confidence interval 3.53-7.45]), respectively. The logistic regression analysis showed that age, hemodynamic instability, the need of packed red blood cells concentrates in the initial 24 h, the severity of brain injury, and the need for invasive neuromonitoring were significantly associated with MOF development. CONCLUSIONS: MOF occurred in 6.2% of patients with TBI admitted to the ICU and was associated with increased mortality. MOF was associated with age, hemodynamic instability, the need of packed red blood cells concentrates in the initial 24 h, the severity of brain injury, and the need for invasive neuromonitoring.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Encefálicas , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(23)2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36498789

RESUMEN

Our objective was to analyze the contribution of acute kidney injury (AKI) to the mortality of isolated TBI patients and its associated risk factors. Observational, prospective and multicenter registry (RETRAUCI) methods were used, from March 2015 to December 2019. Isolated TBI was defined as abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥ 3 head with no additional score ≥ 3. A comparison of groups was conducted using the Wilcoxon test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. A multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze associated risk factors in the development of AKI. For the result, overall, 2964 (30.2%) had AIS head ≥ 3 with no other area with AIS ≥ 3. The mean age was 54.7 (SD 19.5) years, 76% were men, and the ground-level falls was 49.1%. The mean ISS was 18.4 (SD 8). The in-hospital mortality was 22.2%. Up to 310 patients (10.6%) developed AKI, which was associated with increased mortality (39% vs. 17%, adjusted OR 2.2). Associated risk factors (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval)) were age (OR 1.02 (1.01-1.02)), hemodynamic instability (OR 2.87 to OR 5.83 (1.79-13.1)), rhabdomyolysis (OR 2.94 (1.69-5.11)), trauma-associated coagulopathy (OR 1.67 (1.05-2.66)) and transfusion of packed red-blood-cell concentrates (OR 1.76 (1.12-2.76)). In conclusion, AKI occurred in 10.6% of isolated TBI patients and was associated with increased mortality.

3.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(6): 722-730, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35332519

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Chronic critical illness after trauma injury has not been fully evaluated, and there is little evidence in this regard. We aim to describe the prevalence and risk factors of chronic critical illness (CCI) in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational multicenter study (Spanish Registry of Trauma in ICU (RETRAUCI)). Period March 2015 to December 2019. Trauma patients admitted to the ICU, who survived the first 48 h, were included. Chronic critical illness (CCI) was considered as the need for mechanical ventilation for a period greater than 14 days and/or placement of a tracheostomy. The main outcomes measures were prevalence and risk factors of CCI after trauma. RESULTS: 1290/9213 (14%) patients developed CCI. These patients were older (51.2 ± 19.4 vs 49 ± 18.9); p < .01) and predominantly male (79.9%). They presented a higher proportion of infectious complications (81.3% vs 12.7%; p < .01) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (27.02% vs 5.19%; p < .01). CCI patients required longer stays in the ICU and had higher ICU and overall in-hospital mortality. Age, injury severity score, head injury, infectious complications, and development of MODS were independent predictors of CCI. CONCLUSION: CCI in trauma is a prevalent entity in our series. Early identification could facilitate specific interventions to change the trajectory of this process.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Traumatismo Múltiple , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Am Surg ; 87(3): 370-375, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To compare the main outcomes of trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), hemorrhagic shock, and the combination of both using data from the Spanish trauma intensive care unit (ICU) registry (RETRAUCI). METHODS: Patients admitted to the participating ICUs from March 2015 to May 2019 were included in the study. The main outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of TBI, hemorrhagic shock, and/or both. Comparison of groups with quantitative variables was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and differences between groups with categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Overall, 310 patients (3.98%) were presented with TBI and hemorrhagic shock. Patients with TBI and hemorrhagic shock received more red blood cell (RBC) concentrates, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), a higher ratio FFP/RBC, and had a higher incidence of trauma-induced coagulopathy (60%) (P < .001). These patients had higher mortality (P < .001). Intracranial hypertension was the leading cause of death (50.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TBI and hemorrhagic shock occur in nearly 4% of trauma ICU patients. These patients required a higher amount of RBC concentrates and FFP and had an increased mortality.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 44(6): 371-388, ago.-sept. 2020.
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-187189

RESUMEN

El 11 de marzo de 2020 el director general de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) declaró la enfermedad causada por el SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) como una pandemia. La propagación y evolución de la pandemia está poniendo a prueba los sistemas sanitarios de decenas de países y ha dado lugar a una miríada de artículos de opinión, planes de contingencia, series de casos e incipientes ensayos. Abarcar toda esta literatura es complejo. De forma breve y sintética, en la línea de las anteriores recomendaciones de los Grupos de Trabajo, la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) ha elaborado esta serie de recomendaciones básicas para la asistencia a pacientes en el contexto de la pandemia


On March 11, 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) as a pandemic. The spread and evolution of the pandemic is overwhelming the healthcare systems of dozens of countries and has led to a myriad of opinion papers, contingency plans, case series and emerging trials. Covering all this literature is complex. Briefly and synthetically, in line with the previous recommendations of the Working Groups, the Spanish Society of Intensive, Critical Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) has prepared this series of basic recommendations for patient care in the context of the pandemic


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , Neumonía Viral , Personal de Salud/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , España/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Pandemias , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración
6.
Case Rep Crit Care ; 2011: 293917, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24804116

RESUMEN

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (SH) represents a therapeutic emergency because of the possibility of developing cardiovascular events and hyperlipemic acute pancreatitis (PA). Most patients with SH suffer primary or genetic abnormality in lipid metabolism in combination with a precipitating factor such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, and drug intake. The standard treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) with omega 3 fatty acids and fibrates, along with dietary changes, has no effect on an emergency situation. There are no clinical guidelines to SH, but therapy with insulin, heparin, a combination of both, plasmapheresis, or octreotide have been tested succesfully. We report the case of a 10-year-old girl with clinical acute pancreatitis and diabetic ketoacidosis debut, along with incidental finding of an SH, who had a good outcome after treatment with insulin intravenous infusion.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...