Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
13.
Rev Neurol ; 73(6): 187-193, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Español, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515331

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Septic thrombosis of intracranial venous sinuses (STSV) is a rare and severe complication of cranial infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The main objective of this paper is to describe the clinical data, diagnostic procedures, treatment and evolution of a series of cases of STSV. In addition, the current literature is reviewed. Observational retrospective study by review of medical histories (January 1995-December 2016). The data collected were: clinical, analytical, epidemiological, microbiological, radiological, management and follow-up. A descriptive and statistical analysis of the data was done. RESULTS: Twelve children were included (86,832 admissions studied). They have a median age of 4.5 years (range 1-13) with a median time of symptoms of 6 days (range 1-25). At admission, the clinical data were: fever (11/12), vomiting (9/12) and headache (8/12). They also showed bad general status 12/12, 7/12 acute otitis media and 5/12 VI cranial nerve paresis. The lumbar puncture was pathological in 4/12. The most frequently microorganism isolated was Streptococcus sp. Prothrombotic mutations were confirmed on 2/12. Cranial computed tomography allowed diagnosis in 9/12; the magnetic resonance imaging achieves that in 12/12. Previous neurological signs or time to diagnosis did not influence the appearance of other image complications. All received antibiotic treatment, heparin 10/12 and 11/12 surgery. There were no sequels. CONCLUSION: In our series otitis, headache, vomiting and fever were prevalent. Complementary tests allowed the suspect but the definitive diagnosis was obtained by neuroimaging. There were no sequels and the therapies were mainly wide broad-spectrum antibiotics, heparin, and surgical.


TITLE: Trombosis séptica pediátrica de senos venosos intracraneales: del diagnóstico al alta. Veinte años de experiencia.Introducción. La trombosis séptica de los senos venosos intracraneales (TSSV) es una complicación rara y grave de las infecciones craneales. Materiales y métodos. El objetivo principal de este trabajo es describir los datos clínicos, procedimientos diagnósticos, tratamiento y evolución de una serie de casos de TSSV. Además, se revisa la bibliografía actual. Es un estudio retrospectivo observacional mediante revisión de historias médicas (enero de 1995-diciembre de 2016). Los datos recogidos fueron: clínicos, analíticos, epidemiológicos, microbiológicos, radiológicos, de manejo y de seguimiento. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo y estadístico de los datos. Resultados. Se incluyó a 12 niños (86.832 ingresos estudiados). La mediana de edad fue de 4,5 años (rango: 1-13), con un tiempo medio de síntomas de 6 días (rango: 1-25). En el momento de la admisión, los datos clínicos fueron: fiebre (11/12), vómitos (9/12) y dolor de cabeza (8/12). También mostraron mal estado general, 12/12; otitis media aguda, 7/12; y paresia del VI par craneal, 5/12. La punción lumbar fue patológica en 4/12. El microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado fue Streptococcus spp. Se confirmaron mutaciones protrombóticas en 2/12. La tomografía computarizada craneal permitió el diagnóstico en 9/12; la resonancia magnética lo logró en 12/12. Los signos neurológicos anteriores o el tiempo de diagnóstico no influyeron en la aparición de otras complicaciones de la imagen. Recibieron tratamiento antibiótico 12/12; heparina, 10/12; y cirugía, 11/12. No hubo secuelas. Conclusión. En nuestra serie, la otitis, el dolor de cabeza, los vómitos y la fiebre fueron frecuentes. Las pruebas complementarias permitieron el diagnóstico de sospecha, pero el diagnóstico definitivo se obtuvo por neuroimagen. No hubo secuelas y las terapias fueron principalmente antibióticos de amplio espectro, heparina y cirugía.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/terapia , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/complicaciones , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 73(6): 187-193, Sep 16, 2021. tab
Artículo en Inglés, Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-227999

RESUMEN

Introducción: La trombosis séptica de los senos venosos intracraneales (TSSV) es una complicación rara y grave de las infecciones craneales. Materiales y métodos: El objetivo principal de este trabajo es describir los datos clínicos, procedimientos diagnósticos, tratamiento y evolución de una serie de casos de TSSV. Además, se revisa la bibliografía actual. Es un estudio retrospectivo observacional mediante revisión de historias médicas (enero de 1995-diciembre de 2016). Los datos recogidos fueron: clínicos, analíticos, epidemiológicos, microbiológicos, radiológicos, de manejo y de seguimiento. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo y estadístico de los datos. Resultados: Se incluyó a 12 niños (86.832 ingresos estudiados). La mediana de edad fue de 4,5 años (rango: 1-13), con un tiempo medio de síntomas de 6 días (rango: 1-25). En el momento de la admisión, los datos clínicos fueron: fiebre (11/12), vómitos (9/12) y dolor de cabeza (8/12). También mostraron mal estado general, 12/12; otitis media aguda, 7/12; y paresia del VI par craneal, 5/12. La punción lumbar fue patológica en 4/12. El microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado fue Streptococcus spp. Se confirmaron mutaciones protrombóticas en 2/12. La tomografía computarizada craneal permitió el diagnóstico en 9/12; la resonancia magnética lo logró en 12/12. Los signos neurológicos anteriores o el tiempo de diagnóstico no influyeron en la aparición de otras complicaciones de la imagen. Recibieron tratamiento antibiótico 12/12; heparina, 10/12; y cirugía, 11/12. No hubo secuelas. Conclusión: En nuestra serie, la otitis, el dolor de cabeza, los vómitos y la fiebre fueron frecuentes. Las pruebas complementarias permitieron el diagnóstico de sospecha, pero el diagnóstico definitivo se obtuvo por neuroimagen. No hubo secuelas y las terapias fueron principalmente antibióticos de amplio espectro, heparina y cirugía.(AU)


Introduction: Septic thrombosis of intracranial venous sinuses (STSV) is a rare and severe complication of cranial infections. Materials and methods: The main objective of this paper is to describe the clinical data, diagnostic procedures, treatment and evolution of a series of cases of STSV. In addition, the current literature is reviewed. Observational retrospective study by review of medical histories (January 1995-December 2016). The data collected were: clinical, analytical, epidemiological, microbiological, radiological, management and follow-up. A descriptive and statistical analysis of the data was done. Results: Twelve children were included (86,832 admissions studied). They have a median age of 4.5 years (range 1-13) with a median time of symptoms of 6 days (range 1-25). At admission, the clinical data were: fever (11/12), vomiting (9/12) and headache (8/12). They also showed bad general status 12/12, 7/12 acute otitis media and 5/12 VI cranial nerve paresis. The lumbar puncture was pathological in 4/12. The most frequently microorganism isolated was Streptococcus sp. Prothrombotic mutations were confirmed on 2/12. Cranial computed tomography allowed diagnosis in 9/12; the magnetic resonance imaging achieves that in 12/12. Previous neurological signs or time to diagnosis did not influence the appearance of other image complications. All received antibiotic treatment, heparin 10/12 and 11/12 surgery. There were no sequels. Conclusion: In our series otitis, headache, vomiting and fever were prevalent. Complementary tests allowed the suspect but the definitive diagnosis was obtained by neuroimaging. There were no sequels and the therapies were mainly wide broad-spectrum antibiotics, heparin, and surgical.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Trombosis , Alta del Paciente , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Trombosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Heparina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neurología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Sepsis/complicaciones , Sepsis/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 45(5): 298-312, Junio - Julio 2021. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-222311

RESUMEN

El soporte respiratorio no invasivo (SRNI) comprende 2 modalidades de tratamiento, la ventilación mecá-nica no invasiva (VMNI) y la terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales (TAFCN) que se aplican en pacientes adultos, pediátricos y neonatales con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA). Sin embargo, el grado de acuerdo entre las distintas especialidades sobre el beneficio de estas técnicas en diferentes escenarios clínicos es controvertido. El objetivo del presente consenso fue elaborar una serie de recomendaciones de buena práctica clínica para la aplicación de soporte no invasivo en pacientes con IRA, avaladas por todas las sociedades científicas involucradas en el manejo del paciente adulto y pediátrico/neonatal con IRA. Para ello se contactó con las diferentes sociedades implicadas, quienes designaron a su vez a un grupo de 26 profesionales con suficiente experiencia en su aplicación. Se realizaron 3 reuniones presenciales para consensuar las recomendaciones (hasta un total de 71) fundamentadas en la revisión de la literatura y en la actualización de la evidencia disponible en relación con 3 categorías: indicaciones, monitorización yseguimiento del SRNI. Finalmente, se procedió a votación telemática de cada una de las recomendaciones, por parte de los expertos de cada sociedad científica implicada. Para la clasificación del grado de acuerdo se optó por un sistema analógico de clasificación fácil e intuitivo de usar, y que expresara con claridad si el procedimiento relacionado con el SRNI debía hacerse, podía hacerse o no debía hacerse. (AU)


Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adulto , Ventilación no Invasiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Cánula , Consenso
16.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(5): 298-312, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34059220

RESUMEN

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Adulto , Cánula , Niño , Consenso , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Oxígeno , Piruvatos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Sociedades Científicas
17.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(5): 298-312, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309463

RESUMEN

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

18.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(2): 150-155, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339722

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The treatment applied for children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for severe acute bronchiolitis may differ from general recommendations. The first objective of our study was to describe the treatments offered to these children in a Spanish tertiary PICU. The second objective was to analyse the changes in management derived from the publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) bronchiolitis guideline in 2014. METHODS: This was a retrospective-prospective observational study conducted during two epidemic waves (2014-2015 and 2015-2016). The AAP guidelines were distributed and taught to PICU staff between both epidemic waves. RESULTS: A total of 138 children were enrolled (78 male). In the first period, 78 children were enrolled. The median age was 1.8 months (IQR 1.1-3.6). There were no differences between the management in the two periods, except for the use of high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT); its use increased in the second period. Overall, 83% of patients received non-invasive ventilation or HFOT. Children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. In comparison, continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure were used less during the period 2015-2016 (P=0.036). Regarding pharmacological therapy, 70% of patients received antibiotics, 23% steroids, 33% salbutamol, 31% adrenaline, and 7% hypertonic saline. The mortality rate was zero. CONCLUSIONS: Our PICU did not follow the AAP recommendations. There were no differences between the two periods, except in the use of HFOT. All children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. The rate of using invasive mechanical ventilation was also low.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Bronquiolitis/diagnóstico , Terapia Combinada , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Respiratoria/normas , Terapia Respiratoria/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA