Outcomes after lung transplantation from selected donors older than 70 years in a single centre: time to close the debate?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of lung transplantations using grafts from donors aged over 70 years against those performed using younger donors. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre analysis includes lung transplants conducted at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022. Lung recipients were classified into 2 groups based on donor age (group A <70 years; group B ≥70 years). Variables regarding demographics, peri and postoperative outcomes and survival were included. The statistical analysis approach included univariable analysis, propensity score matching to address imbalances in donor variables (smoking status), recipient characteristics (sex, age, diagnosis and lung allocation score) and calendar period and survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 353 lung transplants were performed in this period, 47 (13.3%) using grafts from donors aged over 70 years. Donors in group B were more frequently women (70.2% vs 51.6%, P = 0.017), with less smoking history (22% vs 43%, P = 0.002) and longer mechanical ventilation time (3 vs 2 days, P = 0.025). Recipients in group B had a higher lung allocation score (37.5 vs 35, P = 0.035). Postoperative variables were comparable between both groups, except for pulmonary function tests. Group B demonstrated lower forced expiratory volume 1 s levels (2070 vs 2580 ml, P = 0.001). The propensity score matching showed a lower chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction by 12% for group B. One-, three- and five-year survival was equal between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of selected expanded-criteria donors aged over 70 years did not result in increased postoperative morbidity, early mortality or survival in this study.

Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia and Pneumomediastinum/Pneumothorax: A Prospective Observational Study in an Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit.

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of pneumomediastinum (PM) and/or pneumothorax (PTX) in patients with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to the intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) of a COVID-19 monographic hospital in Madrid (Spain) between December 14, 2020 and September 28, 2021. All patients had a diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and required noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS): high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). The incidences of PM and/or PTX, overall and by NIRS, and their impact on the probabilities of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death were studied. RESULTS: A total of 1306 patients were included. 4.3% (56/1306) developed PM/PTX, 3.8% (50/1306) PM, 1.6% (21/1306) PTX, and 1.1% (15/1306) PM + PTX. 16.1% (9/56) of patients with PM/PTX had HFNC alone, while 83.9% (47/56) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP. In comparison, 41.7% (521/1250) of patients without PM and PTX had HFNC alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.13-0.55; p < .001), while 58.3% (729/1250) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.81-7.68; p < .001). The probability of needing IMV among patients with PM/PTX was 67.9% (36/53) (OR 7.46; 95% CI 4.12-13.50; p < .001), while it was 22.1% (262/1185) among patients without PM and PTX. Mortality among patients with PM/PTX was 33.9% (19/56) (OR 4.39; 95% CI 2.45-7.85; p < .001), while it was 10.5% (131/1250) among patients without PM and PTX. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted to the IRCU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring NIRS, incidences of PM/PTX, PM, PTX, and PM + PTX were observed to be 4.3%, 3.8%, 1.6%, and 1.1%, respectively. Most patients with PM/PTX had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP as the NIRS device, much more frequently than patients without PM and PTX. The probabilities of IMV and death among patients with PM/PTX were 64.3% and 33.9%, respectively, higher than those observed in patients without PM and PTX, which were 21.0% and 10.5%, respectively.

Lung transplantation from uncontrolled and controlled donation after circulatory death: similar outcomes to brain death donors.

Controlled donation after circulatory death donors (cDCD) are becoming a frequent source of lungs grafts worldwide. Conversely, lung transplantations (LTx) from uncontrolled donors (uDCD) are sporadically reported. We aimed to review our institutional experience using both uDCD and cDCD and compare to LTx from brain death donors (DBD). This is a retrospective analysis of all LTx performed between January 2013 and December 2019 in our institution. Donor and recipient characteristics were collected and univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were carried out comparing the three cohorts of donors. A total of 239 (84.7%) LTx were performed from DBD, 29 (10.3%) from cDCD and 14 (5%) from uDCD. There were no statistically significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h, 30- and 90-day mortality, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after procedure, ICU and hospital length of stay, airway complications, CLAD incidence or survival at 1 and 3 years after transplant (DBD: 87.1% and 78.1%; cDCD: 89.7% and 89.7%; uDCD: 85.7% and 85.7% respectively; P = 0.42). Short- and mid-term outcomes are comparable between the three types of donors. These findings may encourage and reinforce all types of donation after circulatory death programmes as a valid and growing source of suitable organs for transplantation.

Effect on the donor lungs of using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory death.

OBJECTIVES: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors are becoming a common source of organs for transplantation globally. However, the graft survival rate of cDCD abdominal organs is inferior to that of organs from brain-dead donors. The rapid retrieval (RR) technique is used by most donor organ procurement teams. The abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) technique has been implemented to minimize warm ischaemic damage to the abdominal organs. However, there is limited information on the effect of A-NRP on the quality of the donor lungs. This study aimed to compare lung transplantation outcomes using lungs procured from cDCD donors using the A-NRP and abdominal RR techniques. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of consecutive transplant recipients of cDCD lungs from June 2013 to December 2019 was performed. The recipients were divided into 2 cohorts according to the abdominal procurement technique used. The recipient and donor characteristics (age, sex, cause of brain injury, warm ischaemic time, diagnosis, lung allocation score and other factors), incidence of primary graft dysfunction and early survival were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-eight consecutive lung transplantation recipients were identified (median age 59 years; 61% male); 14 recipients received lungs using the A-NRP and 14 using abdominal RR for abdominal organ retrieval. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.70), hospital mortality (P = 1.0) and 1-year survival rate (P = 1.0) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in lung transplantation outcomes irrespective of the abdominal organ procurement technique used (A-NRP or abdominal RR).

Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection in the (Val)Ganciclovir Era: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Evidence concerning the effectiveness of anti-cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin (CMVIg) following lung transplantation in the era of new antiviral agents is limited and controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At-risk patients (donor seropositive/recipient seronegative [D+/R-] and R+) received valganciclovir for 3 months (R+) or 6 months (D+/R). CMVIg (2 mg/kg) was given to D+/R- patients on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 30 post-transplant, then monthly for a further year. Patients with valganciclovir-induced leukopenia were switched to CMVIg (2 mg/kg) prophylaxis. Tissue-invasive disease was treated with intravenous ganciclovir with CMVIg (2 mg/kg) every other day for 1 week and then weekly until discharge. RESULTS: Of 159 patients analyzed, 26 (17%) were D+/R-. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia was more frequent in D+/R- recipients than in R+ patients (61% vs. 35%; P<0.05), but developed at a similar time (mean 10±6 vs. 11±7 months) and resolved in all cases following treatment. One patient developed clinical and laboratory signs of CMV syndrome (fever >38°C), leukopenia, and detection of CMV in blood. Ten patients developed tissue-invasive disease after completion of prophylaxis (5 pneumonitis and 5 gastrointestinal disease); all were successfully treated with combined intravenous ganciclovir and CMVIg. None of the 18 donor seropositive/recipient seronegative patients who were switched from valganciclovir to CMVIg for persistent leukopenia developed CMV viremia during treatment. No cases of CMV infection or disease were attributable to ganciclovir-resistant strains. During follow-up, 44 patients died (4/26 R+/D- [15%], 40/133 R+ [30%), none directly due to CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Combined prophylaxis with valganciclovir and CMVIg delayed CMV viremia and tissue-invasive disease in D+/R- lung transplant recipients, and prevented CMV-related mortality and development of ganciclovir resistance. CMVIg monotherapy prophylaxis was effective in R+ patients with ganciclovir-related toxicity.

[Aspergillus tracheobronchitis in a lung transplant recipient]. / Traqueobronquitis aspergilar en paciente sometido a trasplante pulmonar.

BACKGROUND: Aspergillus tracheobronchitis is an uncommon cause of pulmonary aspergillosis and almost exclusively affects lung transplant recipients. There is no lung tissue involvement, thus the tracheobron-chial tree is only affected. Patients are asymptomatic, so it is important to make an early diagnosis to prevent progression of the infection and airway complications. Several prophylaxis and treatment strategies have proven to improve the prognosis. CLINICAL CASE: This is the case of a 56 year-old man who underwent bilateral lung transplant for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and developed Aspergillus tracheobronchitis. He received the usual prophylaxis with nebulized liposomal amphotericin B every 48 h. Routine bronchoscopy performed 2 weeks after transplantation showed inflammation with the presence of pseudomembranes that produced a 50% stenosis of the right bronchial anastomosis. Biopsy of the pseudomembranes and bronchial aspirate yielded Aspergillus fumigatus. The patient started treatment with voriconazole twice a day, bronchial debridement through bronchoscopy was carried out, and the treatment with nebulized liposomal amphotericin B was continued every other day. Ten weeks later, there were no endobronchial lesions and the bronchial aspirate cultures were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Aspergillus tracheobronchitis is a complication of the lung transplant recipient. Early diagnosis and prompt antifungal therapy, including new antifungal agents and local debridement, may significantly improve the outcome.