RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Demand for inpatient MRI outstrips capacity which results in long waiting lists. The hospital commenced a routine weekend MRI service in January 2023. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a limited routine weekend MRI service on MRI turnaround times. METHODS: Waiting times for inpatient MRI scans performed before and after the introduction of weekend MRI from January 1 to August 31, 2022, and January 1 to August 31, 2023, were obtained. The turnaround time (TAT) and request category for each study were calculated. Category 1 requests were required immediately, category 2 requests were urgent and category 3 requests were routine. RESULTS: There was a 6% (n = 128) increase in MRI inpatient scanning activity in 2023 (n = 2449) compared to 2022 (n = 2322). There was a significant improvement in overall mean TAT for inpatient MRIs (p < .001) in 2023 (mean 65.2 h, range 0-555 h) compared to 2022 (mean 98.3 h, range 0-816 h). There was no significant difference in the mean waiting time for category 1 MRIs between 2022 and 2023. There was a significant improvement (p < .001) in mean waiting time in 2023 (mean 37.2 h, range 0-555) compared to 2022 (mean 55.4 h, range 0-816) for category 2 MRI. The mean waiting time for category 3 studies also significantly improved (p < .001) in 2023 (mean 93.4 h, range 1-2663) when compared to 2022 (mean 154.8, range 1-1706). CONCLUSION: Routine weekend inpatient MRI significantly shortens inpatient waiting times.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a preventable cause of blindness detectable through screening using retinal digital photography. The Irish National Diabetic Retina Screening (DRS) programme, Diabetic RetinaScreen, provides free screening services to patients with diabetes from aged 12 years and older. A technical failure (TF) occurs when digital retinal imaging is ungradable, resulting in delays in the diagnosis and treatment of sight-threatening disease. Despite their impact, the causes of TFs, and indeed the utility of interventions to prevent them, have not been extensively examined. Aim: Primary analysis aimed to identify factors associated with TF. Secondary analysis examined a subset of cases, assessing patient data from five time points between 2019 and 2021 to identify photographer/patient factors associated with TF. Methods: Patient data from the DRS database for one provider were extracted for analysis between 2018 and 2022. Information on patient demographics, screening results, and other factors previously associated with TF were analyzed. Primary analysis involved using mixed-effects logistic regression models with nested patient-eye random effects. Secondary analysis reviewed a subset of cases in detail, checking for causes of TF. Results: The primary analysis included a total of 366,528 appointments from 104,407 patients over 5 years. Most patients had Type 2 diabetes (89.2%), and the overall TF rate was 4.9%. Diabetes type and duration, dilate pupil status, and the presence of lens artefacts on the camera were significantly associated with TF. The Secondary analysis identified the primary cause of TF was found to be optically dense cataracts, accounting for over half of the TFs. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the causes of TF within the Irish DRS program, highlighting cataracts as the primary contributing factor. The identification of patient-level factors associated with TF facilitates appropriate interventions that can be put in place to improve patient outcomes and minimize delays in treatment and diagnosis.
RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this retrospective review was to analyse the frequency of patients presenting with flashes and/or floaters (F/F) on bright versus dark days to the eye emergency department of a tertiary referral hospital (the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital) over a 3-year period. The diagnostic and clinical outcomes of F/F presentations were also analysed. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed eye casualty attendances between January 2018 and December 2020. Solar irradiation (j/cm2) at ground level was retrieved from the records of Met Eireann (Irish National Meteorological Service) via their open access records. A review of electronic patient medical records using the in-house database patient centre was carried out of all patients who attended EED of during the study timeline on the 5 'brightest' and 5 'darkest' days of each year. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty patient presentations were analysed in total. Overall, 16% (n = 119) of all patients that attended EED during the timeframe of the study presented with F/F. One hundred six patients (89%) presented with floaters, 40 patients (34%) presented with flashing lights/photopsia, and 35 patients (29%) presented with both F/F. More patients presented to EED with F/F on bright days when compared with dark days (74 vs 45, p < 0.05). Eighty-nine percent of all patients with F/F presented with monocular floaters. There were more floater presentations during bright when compared with dark days (70 vs 36, p < 0.05). More patients were diagnosed with PVD on bright days when compared with those diagnosed with PVD on dark days (43vs 15, p < 0.05). More RDs were diagnosed on dark days compared with bright days (7 vs 3, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study established that F/F presentations were more likely to present during bright days when compared with dark days. The diagnosis of PVD was more common during bright days, and RDs were diagnosed significantly more frequently on dark days. Although incident solar radiation was correlated with greater floaters/PVD presentation, causation is unlikely, and the duration of PVD may have been longer in patients presenting on bright days (i.e. pseudo-sudden symptoms).
