The N-terminus of the Begomovirus nuclear shuttle protein (BV1) determines virulence or avirulence in Phaseolus vulgaris.

The BV1 gene of the bipartite Begomovirus genome encodes a nuclear shuttle protein (NSP) that is also an avirulence determinant in common bean. The function of the NSP of two common bean-infecting bipartite begomoviruses, Bean dwarf mosaic virus (BDMV) and Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV), was investigated using a series of hybrid DNA-B components expressing chimeric BDMV and BGYMV NSP, and genotypes of the two major common bean gene pools: Andean (cv. Topcrop) and Middle American (cvs. Alpine and UI 114). BDMV DNA-A coinoculated with HBDBG4 (BDMV DNA-B expressing the BGYMV NSP) and HBDBG9 (BDMV DNA-B expressing a chimeric NSP with the N-terminal 1 to 42 amino acids from BGYMV) overcame the BDMV resistance of UI 114. This established that the BDMV NSP is an avirulence determinant in UI 114, and mapped the domain involved in this response to the N-terminus, which is a variable surface-exposed region. BDMV DNA-A coinoculated with HBDBG10, expressing a chimeric NSP with amino acids 43 to 92 from BGYMV, was not infectious, revealing an essential virus-specific domain. In the BGYMV background, the BDMV NSP was a virulence factor in the Andean cv. Topcrop, whereas it was an avirulence factor in the Middle American cultivars, particularly in the absence of the BGYMV NSP. The capsid protein (CP) also played a gene pool-specific role in viral infectivity; it was dispensable for infectivity in the Andean cv. Topcrop, but was required for infectivity of BDMV, BGYMV, and certain hybrid viruses in the Middle American cultivars. Redundancy of the CP and NSP, which are nuclear proteins involved directly or indirectly in viral movement, provides a masking effect that may allow the virus to avoid host defense responses.

[Botulin toxin as treatment for spasticity and dystonia in infantile cerebral paralysis]. / Toxina botulínica como tratamiento de la espasticidad y distonía en la parálisis cerebral infantil.

UNLABELLED: Treatment of spasticity and dystonía in PCI with Botulinum toxin A. BACKGROUND: Botulinum-A (NxTxBoA) toxin produce neuromuscular blockade, it has been effective with therapeutic purposes in strabismus, focal dystonias and spasticity. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the therapeutically effects off NxTxBoA in cerebral palsy (CP) spastic and/or dystonic in children. Prospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 CP patients (8 spastic and 4 spastic/dystonic) were treated with NxTxBoA in affected muscles at least for 2 doses by up 12 months. The indication was: improve limb function, to avoid surgical correction or improve hygienic or dressing. Ashworth Spasticity Scale (ASS), functional scale for Dystonic Sindou-Millet (SMS) and O'Brien Global Assessment Scale (OGAS) were used to evaluate improvement. STATISTICAL METHODS: No parametric tests, Wilcoxon's rang's test and sign test were used with p < 0.05. RESULTS: Total doses session was 3-10 U/kg. AAS showed muscle spasticity improvement in two grades in 8 patients, and one grade in the rest (p = 0.004). SMS showed the muscle dystonic improve up 60% in two patients improve 50% in others (p = 0.006). OGAS demonstrated a good correlation. Mean treatment effect during 4.8 months (rank 4 to 10 m). Two patients had side effects, general weakness, instability, and focal haematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin type A proved a highly useful adjuvant therapy and conservative management in CP.

Bean dwarf mosaic virus BV1 protein is a determinant of the hypersensitive response and avirulence in Phaseolus vulgaris.

The capacities of the begomoviruses Bean dwarf mosaic virus (BDMV) and Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) to differeBean dwarf mosaic viru certain common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars were used to identify viral determinants of the hypersensitive response (HR) and avirulence (avr) in BDMV. A series of hybrid DNA-B components, containing BDMV and BGYMV sequences, was constructed and coinoculated with BDMV DNA-A (BDMV-A) or BDMVA-green florescent protein into seedlings of cv. Topcrop (susceptible to BDMV and BGYMV) and the BDMV-resistant cvs. Othello and Black Turtle Soup T-39 (BTS). The BDMV avr determinant, in bean hypocotyl tissue, was mapped to the BDMV BV1 open reading frame and, most likely, to the BV1 protein. The BV1 also was identified as the determinant of the HR in Othello. However, the HR was not required for resistance in Othello nor was it associated with BDMV resistance in BTS. BDMV BV1, a nuclear shuttle protein that mediates viral DNA export from the nucleus, represents a new class of viral avr determinant. These results are discussed in terms of the relationship between the HR and resistance.

Bean golden yellow mosaic virus from Chiapas, Mexico: Characterization, Pseudorecombination with Other Bean-Infecting Geminiviruses and Germ Plasm Screening.

ABSTRACT The complete nucleotide (nt) sequences of the cloned DNA-A (2644 nts) and DNA-B (2609 nts) components of Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV-MX) from Chiapas, Mexico were determined. The genome organization of BGYMV-MX is similar to that of other Western Hemisphere bipartite geminiviruses (genus Begomovirus). Infectivity of the cloned BGYMV-MX DNA components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants was demonstrated by particle bombardment and agroinoculation. BGYMV-MX was identified as a BGYMV (previously type II BGMV) isolate based on sequence analyses, sap-transmissibility, and pseudorecombination experiments with other bean-infecting begomoviruses. On the basis of differences in the DNA-B hypervariable region, symptom phenotype, and properties of infectious pseudorecombinants, BGYMV-MX may represent a distinct strain of BGYMV. Pseudorecombination experiments further established that BGYMV symptom determinants mapped to DNA-B, and that BGYMV-MX was most closely related to BGYMV from Guatemala. A Tomato leaf crumple virus (TLCrV) DNA-A/BGYMV-MX DNA-B pseudorecombinant was infectious in bean, establishing that a viable reassortant can be formed between begomovirus species from different phylogenetic clusters. Bean germ plasm representing the two major gene pools (Andean and Mesoamerican) was screened for response to BGYMV-MX with three methods of inoculation: sap-inoculation, particle bombardment, and agroinoculation. Andean germ plasm was very susceptible and similar results were obtained with all three methods, whereas Mesoamerican germ plasm showed resistance to BGYMV-MX, particularly with agroinoculation.

First Report of Tomato Mottle Geminivirus Infecting Tomatoes in Yucatan, Mexico.

Whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses are a major constraint on tomato production in Mexico (3). In the Yucatan State, these viruses can cause serious losses in late season plantings. As part of an effort to characterize these viruses, leaf samples from four tomato plants showing symptoms of geminivirus infection, such as stunted growth and leaf mottling and deformation, were collected from a single field in the Yucatan State in February, 1996. Geminivirus nucleic acids were detected in leaf samples from all four plants by squash blot hybridization analysis with a general DNA probe for Western Hemisphere whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses (2). Nicotiana benthamiana plants inoculated with sap prepared with leaf tissue from one plant developed stunted growth and leaf mottling and deformation. When graft-transmitted from N. benthamiana to tomato, the geminivirus(es) induced leaf mottling and deformation, which were similar to symptoms in the field-collected tomato plants. The presence of geminivirus DNA in the sap- and graft-inoculated plants was confirmed with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and degenerate primers for the DNA-A (PAL1v1978 and PAR1c496) or DNA-B (PBL1v2040 and PCRc1) components of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses (4). Using PCR and these degenerate primers, approximately 1.1-kb DNA-A and approximately 0.6-kb DNA-B fragments were amplified from DNA extracts prepared from leaves of each of the four Yucatan tomato plants. No DNA fragments were amplified from these extracts with primers for pepper huasteco geminivirus (pAL1c2329 and pAL1v1471, or pBR1c840 and pBL1v1830). To determine the identity of the geminivirus(es) infecting these tomato plants, the PCR-amplified DNA-A and DNA-B fragments from one of the samples were cloned and sequenced. Comparisons made with these sequences revealed two distinct types of DNA-A and DNA-B clones, indicating a mixed infection of at least two bipartite geminiviruses. DNA-A and DNA-B sequences of one set of clones were >97% identical to sequences of tomato mottle geminivirus (ToMoV) from Florida (1). The presence of ToMoV in all four tomato leaf samples was demonstrated by the PCR-mediated amplification of a 0.9-kb DNA-A fragment with ToMoV-specific primers (pAL1v2295 and pAR1c580). The identity of this 0.9-kb DNA fragment was further confirmed based upon its hybridization with a full-length clone of ToMoV DNA-A under high stringency conditions (2). A data base search made with the sequence of the other type of DNA-A clone revealed sequence identities of <70% with various bipartite geminiviruses (e.g., identities of 70% with tomato mottle, 69% with Sida golden mosaic, 67% with bean dwarf mosaic, and 66% with taino tomato mottle and with potato yellow mosaic), which confirmed that a second geminivirus was present in a mixed infection with ToMoV in this tomato leaf sample. To confirm the bipartite nature of this geminivirus, a DNA-B fragment that contained the common region (CR) sequence was amplified from the same sample with PCR and primers PBL1v2040 and PBR1c970 (a degenerate primer that anneals within the BV1 open reading frame; F. M. Zerbini and R. L. Gil-bertson, unpublished data), cloned, and sequenced. The CR sequence of this DNA-B fragment was 96% identical to that of the DNA-A fragment, which establishes the presence of another bipartite geminivirus in this sample. This is the first report of ToMoV in Mexico. These results also suggest that at least two bipartite geminiviruses may infect tomatoes in the Yucatan Peninsula. References: (1) A. M. Abouzid et al. J. Gen. Virol. 73:3225, 1992. (2) R. L. Gilbertson et al. Plant Dis. 75:336, 1991. (3) J. E. Polston and P. K. Anderson. Plant Dis. 81:1358, 1997. (4) M. R. Rojas et al. Plant Dis. 77:340, 1993.