Physiotherapy interventions in post- and long-COVID-19: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Post- or long-COVID-19 conditions manifest with a spectrum of symptoms reminiscent of pulmonary, musculoskeletal, psychological and neurological disorders. Individuals with post- or long-COVID-19 syndrome often present with myalgia, pulmonary problems and fatigue, which significantly impact their daily functioning. Physiotherapy interventions are an accepted medical remedy for these symptoms. This scoping review aims to outline the evidence of physiotherapy interventions documented in the scientific literature, specifically focusing on hands-on therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review conforms to the methodological framework established by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The procedure for drafting a scoping review involves several steps, starting with defining the research question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies are those analysing physiotherapy treatment parameters for direct patient interaction in post- and long-COVID-19 patients. Telemedicine and entirely home-based workouts will be excluded aligning with the context of outpatient physiotherapy in Germany. The literature search will be conducted in PubMed, EBSCO research, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PEDRO, Cochrane and WISO databases by two independent researchers. Screening, data extraction and a critical appraisal will be performed by these researchers using assessment tools provided by the JBI. Extracted data will encompass demographic characteristics, definitions of post- or long-COVID-19 conditions, descriptions of interventions, their treatment parameters and treatment outcome. Subsequently, findings will be disseminated through a scoping review article or conference presentation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Given that this review does not involve human participants, ethical committee approval is deemed unnecessary. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic and physiotherapeutic conferences.

[Personal and Environmental Contextual Factors in Socio-Medical Orthopedic Evaluation Reports]. / Personbezogene und Umweltfaktoren in sozialmedizinischen orthopädischen Gutachten.

INTRODUCTION: The personal and environmental contextual factors of the ICF describe not only physical and mental health but also (occupational) participation. So far, the extent to which these contextual factors are taken into account in the socio-medical evaluation has not been clarified. Contextual factors can guide allocation to disability pension or rehabilitative interventions in an individualized and targeted manner. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of ICF contextual factors in socio-medical evaluation. METHODOLOGY: A frequency analysis of contextual factors in socio-medical reports for musculoskeletal disorders was performed. Contextual factors mentioned several times were coded once in the report. In the frequency ranking, each environmental and personal factor was categorized as "frequent," "moderate," and "rare." RESULTS: 215 socio-medical reports with musculoskeletal diagnoses starting from 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All socio medical reports were analyzed for the occurence of personal contextual and environmental factors. In particular, personal factors were identified, which provide information about general personal characteristics or the general state of health. Almost half of the environmental factors were rarely identified. CONCLUSION: Many ICF contextual factors are constantly recorded in the analyzed reports. The important influence of these factors on return to work is well known. Thus, the absence or low presence of the ICF contextual factors from the chapters Attitudes (i4), Basic Skills (i4) and Support & Relationships (e3), which are also contextual to the assessed person's experience of the world of work, was surprising. The relevance of the frequently and rarely identified contextual factors for the socio-medical evaluation of musculoskeletal disability pension applicants must be questioned.

[Outpatient rehabilitative care for patients with Long-COVID - a guideline-based clinical practice guideline]. / Ambulante rehabilitative Versorgung von Patienten mit Long-COVID ­ eine leitlinienorientierte klinisch-praktische Handlungsempfehlung.

BACKGROUND: Even after weeks and months, persisting and also newly occurring symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection are common and lead in many cases to a broad spectrum of impairments and participation restrictions in all areas of daily life. Scientific evidence on therapeutic options still is limited. The aim of this work is therefore to provide pragmatic treatment recommendations analogous to the current therapeutic appliances guideline. METHOD: In addition to a search in six electronic databases, the experiences from the treatment of more than hundred affected persons from the post-COVID outpatient rehabilitation service were used. Additionally, experiences with patients with similar symptoms from other diseases were included. All authors worked together to develop the pragmatic recommendations for the treatment of the main symptoms within the framework of outpatient therapy measures. A list of recommended diagnostics and functional assessments prior to therapy was also developed. RESULTS: For the main symptoms fatigue, dyspnoea and cognitive impairment, the catalog of therapeutic products offers a wide range of therapeutic options under the diagnosis U09.9. The therapy packages should be composed individually and adapted to the patient's performance level that regularly should be (re-)assessed. Informing the patient about possible relapses and deteriorations and how to deal with them should be also part of the treatment regimen. DISCUSSION: Physical modalities and rehabilitation interventions should be used in out-patient rehabilitation setting for the treatment of Long-COVID. In this regard, it is also important to take into account and treat serious complications after the disease, such as post-intensive care syndrome. Due to the rapid evolution of the knowledge a frequent review of scientific papers and recommendations should be conducted. High-quality intervention studies are necessary to achieve greater evidence in this field.