Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review assessing treatment options from the interventional radiologist's perspective.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is estimated that 35-40% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with multiple nodules at the time of diagnosis. Treating multifocal disease is difficult given patient population heterogeneity. Multiple interventional radiological (IR) options, including ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE), are available, each with its own merits and limitations. Our aim is to explore the current state of the literature to identify where each of these options is best applied to multifocal HCC management. METHODS: A narrative literature review of 107 papers was performed in PubMed. Articles from 2010 and newer were used for clinical data and for classification/scoring system details. The majority of the keywords for searches include the treatment modality name alongside terms such as "HCC", "multifocal", or "multinodular". KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Ablation is a curative option for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A disease and is appropriate when liver transplantation (LT) is impractical. It is ideal in disease with ≤3 nodules (each <3 cm) preferably confined to one segment. TACE [conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), balloon-occluded TACE (B-TACE), and less so hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)] is the major workhorse for multifocal BCLC B disease, in pre-transplant downstaging, and in advanced disease palliation. The Kinki BCLC B subclassification can guide TACE subtype selection. TACE response can be assessed over 2-3 sessions per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and patient session tolerance. TARE is an option for BCLC C disease, with BCLC A/B applications limited by radiation induced liver disease (RILD). Pseudo-ablative techniques like sub-selective TARE (sTARE) are promising but are unproven and less useful in multinodular disease. Finally, combination therapies [TACE + ablation, liver resection (LR) + ablation/TACE] are an exciting option but warrant further study. CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal HCC remains challenging to manage. While BCLC is a useful starting point, the patient's tumor imaging characteristics and clinical circumstances must be considered when selecting the appropriate treatment modality.

Segmental liver ischemia/infarction after elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: clinical outcomes in 10 patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical significance and potential mechanisms of segmental liver ischemia and infarction following elective creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 374 elective TIPS creations between March 2006 and September 2014 was performed, yielding 77 contrast-enhanced scans for review. Patients with imaging evidence of segmental perfusion defects were identified. Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, liver volume, and percentage of liver ischemia/infarct were calculated. Clinical outcomes after TIPS creation were reviewed. RESULTS: Ten patients showed segmental liver ischemia/infarction on contrast-enhanced imaging after elective TIPS creation. Associated imaging findings included thrombosis of the posterior division (n = 7) and anterior division (n = 3) of the right portal vein (PV). The right hepatic vein was thrombosed in 5 patients, as was the middle hepatic vein in 3 and the left hepatic vein in 1. One patient had acute thrombosis of the shunt and main PV. Three patients developed acute liver failure: 2 died within 30 days and 1 required emergent liver transplantation. One patient died of acute renal failure 20 days after TIPS creation. A large infarct in a transplant recipient resulted in biloma formation. Five patients survived without additional interventions with follow-up times ranging from 3 months to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental perfusion defects are not an uncommon imaging finding after elective TIPS creation. Segmental ischemia was associated with thrombosis of major branches of the PVs and often of the hepatic veins. Clinical outcomes varied significantly, from transient problems to acute liver failure with high mortality rates.

Superior vena cava (SVC) filters placed over central lines - analysis of line trapping and difficulties with line retrieval: an in-vitro experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Placement of superior vena cava (SVC) filters has been shown to be both safe and effective in preventing symptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients with upper extremity deep venous thrombosis that have contraindications to anticoagulation therapy. In many patients, existing central lines pose a challenge to SVC filter placement due to the theoretical risk of line displacement and/or entrapment. PURPOSE: To assess the risk of catheter entrapment by filter legs during SVC filter deployment and the risk of subsequent filter migration during catheter removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model was created by placing a 22 mm vascular graft inside a plastic tube and submerged in a warm saline bath. Five types of filters were deployed under fluoroscopic guidance over different types of central lines of varying calibers (5-14 Fr). Each filter was deployed five times over each type of central line. The positioning of the legs of the filters in relationship to the central lines was studied by fluoroscopic and direct inspection. The lines were then removed under fluoroscopic guidance noting any line trapping, migration, and/or tilting of the filters. RESULTS: Movement of the lines during filter expansion was commonly seen after deployment of all filters with varying frequencies. During line removal slight resistance was encountered with the Celect filter (10%) and the Option filter (5%), while significant resistance was only encountered when using the OptEase filter (20%). Filter migration was only observed when the OptEase filter was deployed over large (>10 Fr) caliber lines (10%). CONCLUSION: When SVC filters are placed over existing central lines, the risk of catheter entrapment is very low in this in-vitro model. Filter migration during line retrieval was only observed when the OptEase filter was placed over >10 Fr caliber lines.

Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics/gynecology.

In uterine fibroid embolization (UFE), knowledge of the potential ovarian-uterine anastomoses is important because they provide collateral blood flow that may result in the failure of the UFE or ovarian nontarget embolization. Uterine artery embolization is an alternative treatment of postpartum hemorrhage with 80% to 90% bleeding control and in which fertility can be preserved. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome on routine sonographic or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is often missed. Fallopian tube recanalization allows couples to have unlimited attempts to conceive naturally and avoids the risks (multiple pregnancies, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome), and high cost of in vitro fertilization.

Complications of nonvascular interventions and their management: case-based review.

OBJECTIVE: The educational objectives of this continuing medical education activity are for the reader to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her skills in diagnostic radiology with regard to the complications of nonvascular interventions and their management. CONCLUSION: The six scenarios in this article review how and why complications occur in nonvascular interventional procedures and how to manage them.