Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel agents have expanded the traditional HER2 definitions to include HER2-Low (HER2L) Breast Cancer (BC). We sought to evaluate the distinct molecular characteristics of HER2L BC to understand potential clinical/biologic factors driving resistance and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 13,613 BC samples, tested at Caris Life Sciences via NextGen DNA/RNA Sequencing. BC subtypes were defined by IHC/ISH. CODEai database was used to access clinical outcomes from insurance claims data. RESULTS: Overall, mutational landscape was similar between HER2L and classical subsets of HR+and HRneg cohorts. TP53 mutations were significantly higher in HRneg/HER2L group vs. HR+/HER2L tumors (p<0.001). A higher mutation rate of PIK3CA was observed in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to TNBC subtype (p=0.016). PD-L1 positivity was elevated in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to HR+/HER2L tumors, all p<0.01. Patients with HR+/HER2L tumors treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors had similar OS compared to pts with HR+/HER2-0 (HR=0.89, p=0.012). 27.2% of HR+/HER2L pts had activating PIK3CA mutations. Among HR+PIK3CA mutated tumors, HER2L pts treated with alpelisib showed no difference in OS vs. HER2-0 alpelisib-treated pts (HR=1.23, p=0.517). 13.9% of HER2L TNBC pts were PD-L1+. Interestingly, pts with PD-L1+ HER2L/HRneg (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed improved OS than HER2-0 TNBC (HR=0.61, p=0.046). CONCLUSION: Our findings expand the understanding of the molecular profile of the HER2L subgroup and comparison to the classically defined breast cancer subgroups. Genomic risk assessments after progression on novel therapeutics can be assessed to better define implications for mechanisms of resistance.

Awareness of alcohol as a breast cancer risk factor and intentions to reduce alcohol consumption among U.S. young adult women.

Alcohol consumption is prevalent in young adult women and linked with breast cancer risk. Research to inform interventions targeting alcohol consumption as a breast cancer prevention strategy is limited. We examined young women's awareness of alcohol use as a breast cancer risk factor, identified correlates of awareness, and determined how awareness and conceptual predictors relate to intentions to reduce drinking. Women aged 18-25 years who drank alcohol in the past month (N = 493) completed a cross-sectional survey. Measures captured sociodemographics, breast cancer risk factors, awareness of alcohol use as a breast cancer risk factor, intentions to reduce drinking, and conceptual predictors. Analyses examined correlates of awareness and associations between awareness, conceptual predictors, and intentions to reduce drinking. Awareness was low (28%) and intentions to reduce drinking were moderate (M = 2.60, SD = 0.73, range 1-4). In multivariable analyses, awareness was associated with greater worry about cancer, beliefs that there's not much one can do to reduce cancer risk and everything causes cancer, higher perceived breast cancer risk, and stronger beliefs that reducing drinking reduces breast cancer risk. Awareness was not associated with intentions to reduce drinking. Younger age, older age of alcohol initiation, negative attitudes towards alcohol, fewer friends consuming alcohol, and stronger self-efficacy were associated with intentions to reduce drinking. Few young women recognize alcohol consumption as a breast cancer risk factor. Researchers and policymakers can apply our findings to design new or refine existing interventions to optimize their impact on awareness and alcohol consumption in young women.

Alcohol use is common among young adult women and is linked to an increased risk of breast cancer later in life. This study aimed to identify factors linked to young women's awareness of alcohol as a breast cancer risk factor and factors linked to intentions to reduce drinking. We surveyed 493 women aged 18­25 who resided in Ohio and reported drinking alcohol in the past month. Only 28% of the women were aware that alcohol use increases breast cancer risk, and intentions to reduce drinking were moderate. Factors associated with awareness of alcohol use as a breast cancer risk factor included cancer worry, believing there's not much you can do to lower your risk of cancer, believing everything causes cancer, higher perceived risk of breast cancer, and stronger beliefs that drinking less reduces breast cancer risk. Factors linked to intentions to reduce drinking included younger age, older age at first drinking, more negative attitudes about alcohol, believing fewer friends drink, and higher confidence to reduce drinking. The findings can help researchers and policymakers create new interventions to educate young women about the link between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk and reduce alcohol use as a breast cancer prevention strategy.

Perspectives of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a lapse in routine health care and cancer screenings for many individuals. This study sought to improve our understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women being treated for breast cancer, both in general, and specifically related to their diagnosis. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between August 2021 and February 2022 with women who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer at the Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center in Columbus, Ohio. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded using deductive dominant thematic analysis and inductive coding that allowed for categorization of data as well as identification of emergent themes. RESULTS: Data collected from our 19 interviews revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic posed important challenges for breast cancer patients including fear of COVID-19 infection and feelings of isolation. Most interviewees noted they had been vaccinated against COVID-19 because of a desire to protect themselves and others from getting sick. Some women also expressed concerns about having delayed their screening mammograms due to the pandemic. Several patients described unexpected positive aspects of the pandemic such as being able to spend more time with family and having the ability to continue working because of the option to work from home during their cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide important insight about the impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer patients. We highlight the positives that have been reported because of the pandemic, as well as the need to address delayed breast cancer screening.

The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates. RESULTS: In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Study of ONC201 in Recurrent/Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer and Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ONC201 is a small molecule that can cause nonapoptotic cell death through loss of mitochondrial function. Results from the phase I/II trials of ONC201 in patients with refractory solid tumors demonstrated tumor responses and prolonged stable disease in some patients. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of ONC201 at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer. Fresh tissue biopsies and blood were collected at baseline and at cycle 2 day 2 for correlative studies. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 10 patients with endometrial cancer, 7 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The overall response rate was 0%, and the clinical benefit rate, defined by complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD), was 27% (n = 3/11). All patients experienced an adverse event (AE), which was primarily low grade. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 4 patients; no grade 4 AEs occurred. Tumor biopsies did not show that ONC201 consistently induced mitochondrial damage or alterations in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or the TRAIL death receptors. ONC201 treatment caused alterations in peripheral immune cell subsets. CONCLUSION: ONC201 monotherapy did not induce objective responses in recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer at the RP2D dose of 625 mg weekly but had an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03394027).

Immune correlates with response in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with a tumor targeting immunocytokine NHS-IL12.

The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 delivers IL-12 to the tumor microenvironment by targeting DNA/histones in necrotic areas. The first-in-human clinical trial administered NHS-IL12 subcutaneously in 59 patients treated every four weeks (Q4W), with a maximum tolerated dose of 16.8 mcg/kg. The phase I study was expanded to include a high-exposure cohort that received bi-weekly treatment (Q2W) with two dose levels of NHS-IL12: 12.0 mcg/kg and 16.8 mcg/kg. Here, patients given NHS-IL12 were analyzed both prior to and early after treatment for effects on 10 serum soluble analytes, complete blood counts, and 158 peripheral immune subsets. Higher levels of immune activation were seen with a dose of 16.8 mcg/kg versus 12.0 mcg/kg in patients in the high-exposure cohort, as evidenced by greater increases in serum IFNγ, TNFα, and soluble PD-1, and greater increases in frequencies of peripheral ki67+ mature natural killer (NK), CD8+T, and NKT cells. Greater immune activation was also seen in the Q2W versus Q4W cohort, as demonstrated by greater increases in pro-inflammatory serum analytes, ki67+ CD8+ T, NK, and NKT cells, intermediate monocytes, and a greater decrease in CD73+ T cells. Specific immune analytes at baseline including lower levels of monocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and early changes after treatment such as an increase in refined NK cell subsets and total CD8+ T cells, associated with better clinical response. These findings may help to guide future schedule and dosing regimens of clinical studies of NHS-IL12 as monotherapy and in combination therapies.

A Phase I Single-Arm Study of Biweekly NHS-IL12 in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: NHS-IL12 is a first-in-class, recombinant fusion protein composed of the human monoclonal antibody NHS76 (binds exposed DNA/histones at sites of intratumoral necrosis) fused to 2 IL-12 heterodimers. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of NHS-IL12 monotherapy given subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks was previously reported. The study was expanded to include a high-exposure cohort with NHS-IL12 SC every 2 weeks (q2w). METHODS: This single-arm, phase I trial evaluated NHS-IL12 12 µg/kg SC q2w or 16.8µg/kg SC q2w in patients with metastatic solid tumors. The primary endpoint was safety. RESULTS: Using a 3+3 design, 13 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled and 12 were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluable. There was 1 DLT (Grade 3 aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase [AST/ALT] elevation). Other grade 3 toxicities included: flu-like symptoms 1/13 (8%), decreased absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) 1/13 (8%), decreased white blood cell count (WBC) 1/13 (8%), but most adverse events reported were low grade and self-limiting grade. Fifty percent of evaluable patients (6/12) experienced stable disease (SD) with 42% (5/12) developing progressive disease (PD) at the first restaging. CONCLUSION: Biweekly NHS-IL12 was well tolerated in this small phase I study. Additional studies incorporating NHS-IL12 with other immunomodulating agents are underway. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01417546).

Interplay of Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Among Patients With Cancer and COVID-19.

Importance: Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation. Objective: To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings. Exposures: Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm. Results: The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701.

Emerging strategies in targeting tumor-resident myeloid cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1, programmed death-ligand 1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 provide deep and durable treatment responses which have revolutionized oncology. However, despite over 40% of cancer patients being eligible to receive immunotherapy, only 12% of patients gain benefit. A key to understanding what differentiates treatment response from non-response is better defining the role of the innate immune system in anti-tumor immunity and immune tolerance. Teleologically, myeloid cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, monocytes, and neutrophils, initiate a response to invading pathogens and tissue repair after pathogen clearance is successfully accomplished. However, in the tumor microenvironment (TME), these innate cells are hijacked by the tumor cells and are imprinted to furthering tumor propagation and dissemination. Major advancements have been made in the field, especially related to the heterogeneity of myeloid cells and their function in the TME at the single cell level, a topic that has been highlighted by several recent international meetings including the 2021 China Cancer Immunotherapy workshop in Beijing. Here, we provide an up-to-date summary of the mechanisms by which major myeloid cells in the TME facilitate immunosuppression, enable tumor growth, foster tumor plasticity, and confer therapeutic resistance. We discuss ongoing strategies targeting the myeloid compartment in the preclinical and clinical settings which include: (1) altering myeloid cell composition within the TME; (2) functional blockade of immune-suppressive myeloid cells; (3) reprogramming myeloid cells to acquire pro-inflammatory properties; (4) modulating myeloid cells via cytokines; (5) myeloid cell therapies; and (6) emerging targets such as Siglec-15, TREM2, MARCO, LILRB2, and CLEVER-1. There is a significant promise that myeloid cell-based immunotherapy will help advance immuno-oncology in years to come.