Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 42(6): 101269, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364852

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine (ITM) is a common anesthesia technique for cesarean delivery. The hypothesis was that the addition of ITM will delay micturition in women undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: Fifty-six ASA physical status I and II women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to the PSM group (50 mg prilocaine + 2.5 mcg sufentanil + 100 mcg morphine; n = 30) or PS group (50 mg prilocaine + 2.5 mcg sufentanil; n = 24). The patients in the PS group received a bilateral transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block. The primary outcome was the effect of ITM on the time to micturition and the secondary outcome was the need for bladder re-catheterization. RESULTS: The time to first urge to urinate (8 [6-10] hours in the PSM group versus 6 [4-6] hours in the PS group) and the time to first micturition (10 [8-12] hours in the PSM group versus 6 [6-8] hours in the PS group) were significantly (p < 0.001) prolonged in the PSM group. Two patients in the PSM group met the 800 mL criterium for urinary catheterization after 6 and 8 h respectively. CONCLUSION: This study is the first randomized trial to demonstrate that the addition of ITM to the standardized mixture of prilocaine and sufentanil significantly delayed micturition.


Asunto(s)
Morfina , Sufentanilo , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Vejiga Urinaria , Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio , Prilocaína , Método Doble Ciego
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(3): 269-287, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based international expert consensus regarding anaesthetic practice in hip/knee arthroplasty surgery is needed for improved healthcare outcomes. METHODS: The International Consensus on Anaesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery group (ICAROS) systematic review, including randomised controlled and observational studies comparing neuraxial to general anaesthesia regarding major complications, including mortality, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, genitourinary, thromboembolic, neurological, infectious, and bleeding complications. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, from 1946 to May 17, 2018 were queried. Meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was utilised to assess evidence quality and to develop recommendations. RESULTS: The analysis of 94 studies revealed that neuraxial anaesthesia was associated with lower odds or no difference in virtually all reported complications, except for urinary retention. Excerpt of complications for neuraxial vs general anaesthesia in hip/knee arthroplasty, respectively: mortality odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.80/OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60-1.15; pulmonary OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52-0.80/OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81; acute renal failure OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59-0.81/OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.82; deep venous thrombosis OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42-0.65/OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93; infections OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67-0.79/OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.85; and blood transfusion OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.89/OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82-0.87. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendation: primary neuraxial anaesthesia is preferred for knee arthroplasty, given several positive postoperative outcome benefits; evidence level: low, weak recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: neuraxial anaesthesia is recommended for hip arthroplasty given associated outcome benefits; evidence level: moderate-low, strong recommendation. Based on current evidence, the consensus group recommends neuraxial over general anaesthesia for hip/knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018099935.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Anestesia Epidural/mortalidad , Anestesia General/mortalidad , Anestesia Raquidea/mortalidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/mortalidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/mortalidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Anesth Analg ; 123(2): 501-3, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27442773

RESUMEN

The adductor canal block has become a common analgesic technique in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Dispersion of local anesthetic outside the adductor canal through interfascial layers and blockade of smaller nerves that confer innervation to the knee could contribute to the analgesic efficacy of the adductor canal block. We studied the diffusion of local anesthetic mixed with dye after injection into the adductor canal in fresh human cadavers. In all 8 legs, injectate was found in the popliteal fossa in contact with the sciatic nerve and/or popliteal blood vessels. Interfascial spread patterns were identified.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Rodilla/inervación , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Nervio Ciático/anatomía & histología , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Cadáver , Colorantes/administración & dosificación , Difusión , Humanos , Inyecciones , Rodilla/cirugía , Azul de Metileno/administración & dosificación
4.
Anesth Analg ; 122(1): 279-82, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26678473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The analgesic efficacy reported for the adductor canal block may be related to the spread of local anesthetic outside the adductor canal. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing knee surgery received ultrasound-guided injections of local anesthetic at the level of the adductor hiatus. Sensory-motor block and spread of contrast solution were assessed. RESULTS: Sensation was rated as "markedly diminished" or "absent" in the saphenous nerve distribution and "slightly diminished" in the sciatic nerve territory without motor deficits. Contrast solution was found in the popliteal fossa. CONCLUSIONS: The spread of injectate to the popliteal fossa may contribute to the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/farmacocinética , Articulación de la Rodilla/inervación , Mepivacaína/administración & dosificación , Mepivacaína/farmacocinética , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Umbral del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Bélgica , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Mepivacaína/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Distribución Tisular , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...