The Challenge of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Image Segmentation in the Internal Dosimetry of 177Lu Molecular Therapies.

The aim of this article is to review the single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) segmentation methods used in patient-specific dosimetry of 177Lu molecular therapy. Notably, 177Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals are currently used in molecular therapy of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (ligands for somatostatin receptors) and metastatic prostate adenocarcinomas (PSMA ligands). The proper segmentation of the organs at risk and tumours in targeted radionuclide therapy is an important part of the optimisation process of internal patient dosimetry in this kind of therapy. Because this is the first step in dosimetry assessments, on which further dose calculations are based, it is important to know the level of uncertainty that is associated with this part of the analysis. However, the robust quantification of SPECT images, which would ensure accurate dosimetry assessments, is very hard to achieve due to the intrinsic features of this device. In this article, papers on this topic were collected and reviewed to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the segmentation methods used in clinical practice. Degrading factors of SPECT images were also studied to assess their impact on the quantification of 177Lu therapy images. Our review of the recent literature gives an insight into this important topic. However, based on the PubMed and IEEE databases, only a few papers investigating segmentation methods in 177Lumolecular therapy were found. Although segmentation is an important step in internal dose calculations, this subject has been relatively lightly investigated for SPECT systems. This is mostly due to the inner features of SPECT. What is more, even when studies are conducted, they usually utilise the diagnostic radionuclide 99mTc and not a therapeutic one like 177Lu, which could be of concern regarding SPECT camera performance and its overall outcome on dosimetry.

EFOMP's protocol quality controls in PET/CT and PET/MR.

This article presents the protocol on Quality Controls in PET/CT and PET/MRI published online in May 2022 by the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics (EFOMP), which was developed by the Working group for PET/CT and PET/MRI Quality Control (QC) protocol. The main objective of this protocol was to comprehensively provide simple and practical procedures that may be integrated into clinical practice to identify changes in the PET/CT/MRI system's performance and avoid short- and long-term quality deterioration. The protocol describes the quality control procedures on radionuclide calibrators, weighing scales, PET, CT and MRI systems using selected and measurable parameters that are directly linked to clinical images quality. It helps to detect problems before they can impact clinical studies in terms of safety, image quality, quantification accuracy and patient radiation dose. CT and MRI QCs are described only in the context of their use for PET (attenuation correction and anatomical localization) imaging. Detailed step-by-step instructions have been provided, limiting any misinterpretations or interpersonal variations as much as possible. This paper presents the main characteristics of the protocol illustrated together with a brief summary of the content of each chapter. A regular QC based on the proposed protocol would guarantee that PET/CT and PET/MRI systems operate under optimal conditions, resulting in the best performance for routine clinical tasks.

Early assessment of knee function and quality of life in patients after total knee replacement.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess knee function and changes of the perceived quality of life before total knee replacement surgery and after four weeks of post-operative rehabilitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 200 patients with Kellgren III/IV osteoarthritis of the knee who received a total cemented knee endoprosthesis and underwent comprehensive post-operative rehabilitation for four weeks. The Lysholm and Gilquist Knee Scale was used to assess the clinical status of the patients and the SF-36 Questionnaire served to evaluate the quality of life. Patients were evaluated before the operation and after the four-week rehabilitation. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the following knee functions was observed after four weeks of rehabilitation: walking, climbing stairs, stability, and turning around on one leg. The pain, swelling and limp decreased. The quality of life after the four-week rehabilitation was considerably better in the domains of physical function and emotional status. CONCLUSIONS: The positive effects of surgery and rehabilitation on knee function and quality of life can be observed as early as after four weeks of rehabilitation following total knee replacement.