Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(8): 4986-4996, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789617

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our analysis was designed to characterize the demographics and disparities between the diagnosis of pancreas cancer during emergency presentation (EP) and the outpatient setting (OP) and to see the impact of our institutions pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) on these disparities. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institutional cancer registry and PMDC databases identified patients diagnosed/treated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients (31.1%) were underrepresented minorities (URM). Fifty-seven (64.0%) URMs presented during an EP versus 100 (50.8%) non-URMs (p = 0.037). Forty-one (46.1%) URMs were reviewed at PMDC versus 71 (36.0%) non-URMs (p = 0.10). No differences in clinical and pathologic stage between the cohorts (p = 0.28) were present. URMs took 22 days longer on average to receive treatment (66.5 days vs. 44.8 days, p = 0.003) in the EP cohort and 18 days longer in OP cohort (58.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p < 0.001) compared with non-URMs. Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic enrollment in EP cohort eliminated the difference in time to treatment between cohorts (48.3 days vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.151). RESULTS: Underrepresented minorities were more likely to be diagnosed via EP and showed delayed times to treatment compared with non-URM counterparts. Our PMDC alleviated some of these observed disparities. Future studies are required to elucidate the specific factors that resulted in these findings and to identify solutions.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
Am J Surg ; 227: 77-84, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus-guidelines have endorsed consideration of surgical intervention for pancreatic- neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases. METHODS: Patients with non-functional PNET with liver only metastases from 2010 to 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: 34.7% underwent surgical intervention (13% PNET resection, 2.1% surgical management of liver metastases (SMLM), 19.5% PNET resection â€‹+ â€‹SMLM). In multivariable analysis, government insurance, year of diagnosis>2013, increasing primary tumor size were associated with lower rate of surgical intervention. Receiving treatment at an academic center (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.81-7.11; P â€‹< â€‹0.001) or integrated cancer network (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.57-6.54; P â€‹= â€‹0.001) was associated with a higher rate of surgical intervention. The overall rate of surgical intervention decreased from 45.7% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2019. CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations and the suggested survival benefits, only one-third of patients underwent surgical intervention, potentially influenced by the rising utilization of systemic therapy in the past decade.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Pancreatectomía , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Am Surg ; 87(8): 1327-1333, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345561

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colonic perforation often requires emergent intervention and carries high morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether nonclinical factors, such as transition of care from outpatient facilities to inpatient settings, are associated with increased risk of mortality in patients who underwent emergent surgical intervention for colonic perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2006-2015 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified adult patients who underwent emergent partial colectomy with primary anastomosis ± protecting ostomy or partial colectomy with ostomy with intraoperative finding of wound class III or IV for a diagnosis of perforated viscus. The outcome of interest was 30-day postoperative mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: 4705 patients met criteria, of which 841 (17.9%) died. Univariate analysis showed that patients who died after emergent surgery for perforated viscus were more likely to present from a chronic care facility (13.4% vs. 4.4%, P < .0001) and had longer time from admission to undergoing surgery (mean 4.1 vs. 2.0 days, P < .0001. Logistic regression demonstrated that septic shock vs. none (OR 3.60, P < .0001), sepsis vs. none (OR 1.57, P = .00045), transfer from chronic care facility vs. home (OR 1.87, P < .0001), and increased time from admission vs. operation (OR 1.01, P = .0055) were independently associated with increased risk of death. DISCUSSION: Transfer from a chronic care facility was independently associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing emergent surgery for perforated viscus.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Hospitalización , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Transferencia de Pacientes , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colectomía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Instituciones Residenciales , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA