RNA sequencing-based approaches to identifying disulfidptosis-related diagnostic clusters and immune landscapes in osteoporosis.

Disulfidptosis, a newly recognized cell death triggered by disulfide stress, has garnered attention for its potential role in osteoporosis (OP) pathogenesis. Although sulfide-related proteins are reported to regulate the balance of bone metabolism in OP, the precise involvement of disulfidptosis regulators remains elusive. Herein, leveraging the GSE56815 dataset, we conducted an analysis to delineate disulfidptosis-associated diagnostic clusters and immune landscapes in OP. Subsequently, vertebral bone tissues obtained from OP patients and controls were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) for the validation of key disulfidptosis gene expression. Our analysis unveiled seven significant disulfidptosis regulators, including FLNA, ACTB, PRDX1, SLC7A11, NUBPL, OXSM, and RAC1, distinguishing OP samples from controls. Furthermore, employing a random forest model, we identified four diagnostic disulfidptosis regulators including FLNA, SLC7A11, NUBPL, and RAC1 potentially predictive of OP risk. A nomogram model integrating these four regulators was constructed and validated using the GSE35956 dataset, demonstrating promising utility in clinical decision-making, as affirmed by decision curve analysis. Subsequent consensus clustering analysis stratified OP samples into two different disulfidptosis subgroups (clusters A and B) using significant disulfidptosis regulators, with cluster B exhibiting higher disulfidptosis scores and implicating monocyte immunity, closely linked to osteoclastogenesis. Notably, RNA-seq analysis corroborated the expression patterns of two disulfidptosis modulators, PRDX1 and OXSM, consistent with bioinformatics predictions. Collectively, our study sheds light on disulfidptosis patterns, offering potential markers and immunotherapeutic avenues for future OP management.

Foraminoplasty Performed with a Trephine and a New Tool in Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Foraminoplasty is an important step in transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD). A trephine is widely used in foraminoplasty. However, foraminoplasty using a trephine alone sometimes fails to remove the resected bone, resulting in the bone remaining in the foramen or spinal canal, which can potentially cause neurological irritation or injury. The objective of this study is to introduce a self-designed tool, referred to as an anchoring drill, for use with a trephine in foraminoplasty in TELD and to evaluate its advantages. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent L4-5 TELD between January 2019 to January 2022. Foraminoplasty was performed in all patients. Depending on whether the anchoring drill was used or not, patients were divided into two groups. Surgery-related parameters and complications were reviewed. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were also assessed for all patients. SPSS statistical software was used for statistical calculation. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included (55 in the anchoring drill group and 45 in the trephine group). The incidence of residual bone fragments after foraminoplasty of the anchoring drill group was 9.09%, which was lower than that of the trephine group, at 33.33% (p < 0.05). The mean endoscopic operation time of the anchoring drill group was shorter than that of the trephine group (p < 0.05). The mean fluoroscopy time and duration of foraminoplasty showed no significant differences between the two cohorts. The total perioperative complication incidence was lower in the anchoring drill group, in which the neural irritation incidence showed a significant difference (anchoring drill group: 3.64%, trephine group: 17.78%, p < 0.05). VAS and JOA scores were significantly improved after the operation for all patients (p < 0.001), however, no statistical differences were found between the two groups at each follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: The combination of a trephine with an anchor drill was demonstrated to be safe and effective in foraminoplasty in TELD, improving the success rate of foraminoplasty and reducing neurological complications compared to using trephine alone.

Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Parameters of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Novel Nerve Baffle with a Minimum 1-year Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Since endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion procedure has established, the insertion of cage requires a large working tube, which may lead to nerve root irritation. A novel nerve baffle was used for endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ELIF) and its short-term outcomes were analyzed. METHODS: A total of 62 patients (32 cases in tube group, 30 cases in baffle group) with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent endoscopic lumbar fusion surgery from July 2017 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes were measured using pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association Scores (JOA), and complications. Perioperative blood loss was calculated using the Gross formula. Radiologic parameters included lumbar lordosis, surgical segmental lordosis, cage position, and fusion rate. RESULTS: There were significant differences in VAS, ODI, and JOA scores postoperatively, 6 months after operation, and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05) within the 2 groups. The VAS and ODI score and hidden blood loss were significantly lower (P < 0.05) for the baffle group. There was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis (P > 0.05). Postoperative disc height was significantly higher than preoperative and follow-up disc heights (P < 0.05) for both groups. There was no statistical difference in fusion rate and cage position parameters or subsidence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using the novel baffle has more advantages in nerve protection and hidden blood loss reduction than traditional ELIF with working tube. Compared with the working tube procedure, it has similar or even better short-term clinical outcomes.

Hidden Blood Loss and Its Possible Risk Factors in Full Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is a representative recent emerging minimally invasive operation. The hidden blood loss (HBL) in an Endo-LIF procedure and its possible risk factors are still unclear. METHODS: The blood loss (TBL) was calculated by Gross formula. Sex, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, ASA classification, fusion levels, surgical approach type, surgery time, preoperative RBC, HGB, Hct, PT, INR, APTT, Fg, postoperative mean arterial pressure, postoperative heart rate, Intraoperative blood loss (IBL), patient blood volume were included to investigate the possible risk factors by correlation analysis and multiple linear regression between variables and HBL. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (23 males, 73 females) who underwent Endo-LIF were retrospective analyzed in this study. The HBL was 240.11 (65.51, 460.31) mL (median [interquartile range]). Fusion levels (p = 0.002), age (p = 0.003), hypertension (p = 0.000), IBL (p = 0.012), PT (p = 0.016), preoperative HBG (p = 0.037) were the possible risk factors. CONCLUSION: Fusion levels, younger age, hypertension, prolonged PT, preoperative HBG are possible risk factors of HBL in an Endo-LIF procedure. More attention should be paid especially in multi-level minimally invasive surgery. The increase of fusion levels will lead to a considerable HBL.

Effect of the In Situ Screw Implantation Region and Angle on the Stability of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the in situ screw implantation region and angle on the stability of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) from a biomechanical perspective. METHODS: A validated L2-4 finite element (FE) model was modified for simulation. The L3-4 fused segment undergoing LLIF surgery was modeled. The area between the superior and inferior edges and the anterior and posterior edges of the vertebral body (VB) is divided into four zones by three parallel lines in coronal and horizontal planes. In situ screw implantation methods with different angles based on the three parallel lines in coronal plane were applied in Models A, B, and C (A: parallel to inferior line; B: from inferior line to midline; C: from inferior line to superior line). In addition, four implantation methods with different regions based on the three parallel lines in horizontal plane were simulated as types 1-2, 1-3, 2-2, and 2-3 (1-2: from anterior line to midline; 1-3: from anterior line to posterior line; 2-2: parallel to midline; 2-3: from midline to posterior line). L3-4 ROM, interbody cage stress, screw-bone interface stress, and L4 superior endplate stress were tracked and calculated for comparisons among these models. RESULTS: The L3-4 ROM of Models A, B, and C decreased with the extent ranging from 47.9% (flexion-extension) to 62.4% (lateral bending) with no significant differences under any loading condition. Types 2-2 and 2-3 had 45% restriction, while types 1-2 and 1-3 had 51% restriction in ROM under flexion-extension conditions. Under lateral bending, types 2-2 and 2-3 had 70.6% restriction, while types 1-2 and 1-3 had 61.2% restriction in ROM. Under axial rotation, types 2-2 and 2-3 had 65.2% restriction, while types 1-2 and 1-3 had 59.3% restriction in ROM. The stress of the cage in types 2-2 and 2-3 was approximately 20% lower than that in types 1-2 and 1-3 under all loading conditions in all models. The peak stresses at the screw-bone interface in types 2-2 and 2-3 were much lower (approximately 35%) than those in types 1-2 and 1-3 under lateral bending, while no significant differences were observed under flexion-extension and axial rotation. The peak stress on the L4 superior endplate was approximately 30 MPa and was not significantly different in all models under any loading condition. CONCLUSIONS: Different regions of entry-exit screws induced multiple screw trajectories and influenced the stability and mechanical responses. However, different implantation angles did not. Considering the difficulty of implantation, the ipsilateral-contralateral trajectory in the lateral middle region of the VB can be optimal for in situ screw implantation in LLIF surgery.