Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 422, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is the most common complication following surgery in elderly patients. During pharmacist-led medication reconciliation (PhMR), a predictive risk score considering delirium risk-increasing drugs and other available risk factors could help to identify risk patients. METHODS: Orthopaedic and trauma surgery patients aged ≥ 18 years with PhMR were included in a retrospective observational single-centre study 03/2022-10/2022. The study cohort was randomly split into a development and a validation cohort (6:4 ratio). POD was assessed through the 4 A's test (4AT), delirium diagnosis, and chart review. Potential risk factors available at PhMR were tested via univariable analysis. Significant variables were added to a multivariable logistic regression model. Based on the regression coefficients, a risk score for POD including delirium risk-increasing drugs (DRD score) was established. RESULTS: POD occurred in 42/328 (12.8%) and 30/218 (13.8%) patients in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Of the seven evaluated risk factors, four were ultimately tested in a multivariable logistic regression model. The final DRD score included age (66-75 years, 2 points; > 75 years, 3 points), renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, 1 point), anticholinergic burden (ACB-score ≥ 3, 1 point), and delirium risk-increasing drugs (n ≥ 2; 2 points). Patients with ≥ 4 points were classified as having a high risk for POD. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the risk score model were 0.89 and 0.81 for the development and the validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DRD score is a predictive risk score assessable during PhMR and can identify patients at risk for POD. Specific preventive measures concerning drug therapy safety and non-pharmacological actions should be implemented for identified risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conciliación de Medicamentos/métodos , Cirugía de Cuidados Intensivos
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(4): 1349-1359, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36256482

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this study was to analyse the preoperative medication management within the cardiac surgery patient population and measure the effectiveness of an interprofessional intervention in routine care. METHODS: A jointly developed preoperative medication management was implemented in routine care on multiple levels (inclusion in admission letter to primary care, hotline for inquiries, pocket cards for physicians and correspondence with referring centres). The effectiveness was evaluated by analysing preoperative management before and after implementation. The primary endpoint was the number of drugs managed correctly according to the guidelines after implementation. Secondary endpoints consisted amongst others of bleeding on the intensive care unit, re-thoracotomy, postoperative infarction and cerebrovascular complications. Additionally, possible associations between the correct management and different variables were investigated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: After the implementation, the number of drugs managed correctly according to guidelines increased from 54.0 to 73.5% (P < .001). The effect was more prominent for direct oral anticoagulants and prophylactic aspirin where the guideline adherence increased from 29.2 to 74.5% and from 78.6 to 95.1%, respectively. No difference was seen for sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, metformin, vitamin-K antagonists and dual-antiplatelet therapy. Secondary endpoints showed no safety signals with regard to bleeding or thrombotic events. In multivariate analysis, the intervention was effective (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval [1.32-3.62]) after adjusting for possible confounders. CONCLUSION: An interprofessional programme was effective to improve preoperative medication management in cardiac surgery patients. Sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, metformin and direct oral anticoagulants appear to be especially at risk for incorrect management before cardiac surgery with possible adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Proteínas Facilitadoras del Transporte de la Glucosa , Sodio , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...