The lived experiences of emergency care personnel in the Western Cape, South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal hermeneutic phenomenological study.

In March 2020, the World Health Organisation declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Shortly after the first case of COVID-19 was reported in South Africa, the Western Cape province experienced a rapid growth in the number of cases, establishing it as the epicentre of the disease in South Africa. The aim of this study was to explore emergency care personnel's lived experiences and their perceptions thereof within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Western Cape province. This study followed a longitudinal hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The convenience sample included prehospital and emergency centre medical personnel. Data were collected over a 4-month period using both one-on-one interviews and participant recorded voice recordings. Data were analysed following Ricoeur's theory of interpretation. Four themes were generated during the data analysis: 1) In the beginning, waiting for the unknown; 2) Next, change and adaptation in the workplace; 3) My COVID-19 feelings; 4) Support and connection. Participants discussed the uncertainty associated with responding to an unknown threat and a need to keep up with constant change in an overburdened work environment. Results showed high levels of uncertainty, restriction, fear, anxiety, and exhaustion. Despite these difficulties, participants demonstrated resilience and commitment to caring for patients. A need for support was also highlighted. Results indicated that change, over time, resulted in adaptation to a new way of practising and keeping safe. Healthcare workers experienced intersecting consequences as frontline healthcare workers and members of the public, all of which impacted their well-being. The importance of compassion and encouragement as forms of support was highlighted in the study. Robust and sustained support structures in a time of change, low mood, and exhaustion are essential.

Non-specialist emergency medicine qualifications in Africa: Lessons from the South African Diploma in Primary Emergency Care.

Introduction: Non-specialist emergency medicine qualifications are an important step in developing the specialty of emergency medicine. The Diploma in Primary Emergency Care (Dip PEC) of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa is one of the oldest registrable qualifications. Reviewing its changing role over time has lessons for academics developing Emergency Medicine training in Africa. Methods: Through a series of meetings and stakeholder engagements, the Council of the College of Emergency Medicine conducted a three year review of the qualification focusing on the curriculum, assessment processes, success rate and role of the qualification in the South African medical context. A survey of the perceptions of graduates over the last six years was also conducted. Results: The survey showed candidate numbers increased dramatically from 2011 to 2017, resulting in an entry cap. Lessons identified included ensuring that the qualification is responsive to the state of development of emergency medicine in the country, needing aligned and valid assessment processes and maintaining the value of the qualification in context. Discussion: Emergency medicine qualifications are dynamic in and of themselves and how they relate to their context. Program designers must prioritize ongoing evaluation from the start.

Establishing a South African national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation.

BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical operations have been drastically reduced in South Africa (SA). Guidelines on surgical prioritisation during COVID-19 have been published, but are specific to high-income countries. There is a pressing need for context-specific guidelines and a validated tool for prioritising surgical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, the South African National Surgical Obstetric Anaesthesia Plan Task Team was asked by the National Department of Health to establish a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation. OBJECTIVES: To develop a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation, including a set of recommendations and a risk calculatorfor operative care. METHODS: The surgical prioritisation framework was developed in three stages: (i) a literature review of international, national and local recommendations on COVID-19 and surgical care was conducted; (ii) a set of recommendations was drawn up based on the available literature and through consensus of the COVID-19 Task Team; and (iii) a COVID-19 surgical risk calculator was developed and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 30 documents were identified from which recommendations around prioritisation of surgical care were used to draw up six recommendations for preoperative COVID-19 screening and testing as well as the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. Ninety-nine perioperative practitioners from eight SA provinces evaluated the COVID-19 surgical risk calculator, which had high acceptability and a high level of concordance (81%) with current clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This national framework on COVID-19 surgical prioritisation can help hospital teams make ethical, equitable and personalised decisions whether to proceed with or delay surgical operations during this unprecedented epidemic.