Reinterventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the learning curve of time.

AIM: The DREAM and EVAR-1 trial show a higher reintervention rate after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open repair. Since the initiation of these trials, endovascular-graft design and the experiences with EVAR have evolved substantially. The aim of this study was to compare the need for reinterventions in our recent EVAR procedures with our early procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing an elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was performed. The 68 patients treated between 2000 and 2006 were defined as the "Early EVAR" group; the 41 patients treated between 2006 and 2008 were defined as the "Recent EVAR" group. The median follow-up was 63.3 (range 2-111) and 43.7 (range 1-61) months in the Early and Recent EVAR group respectively. RESULTS: Treatment related mortality occurred in three (4.4%) patients in the Early EVAR group. No treatment related mortality occurred in the Recent EVAR group. In the Early EVAR group 16 reinterventions occurred in 13 patients (19.1%) and in the Recent EVAR group three reinterventions occurred in three patients (7.5%). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: In our center, continued experiences with EVAR, improvement of graft design and a different management of complications have led to a significant decrease in reinterventions after EVAR. These findings and a review of the literature suggests that current need for reintervention after EVAR is substantially less than reported in the early trials.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular or open approach in a Dutch general hospital.

AIM: We compared the outcomes of 56 patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) who underwent either open repair or emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) in a general hospital. It seems feasible that the availability of eEVAR for treatment of RAAA could lead to a decrease in hospital mortality. METHODS: We analyzed all admitted patients with a RAAA, between January 2006 and April 2008, eEVAR is compared to open repair. We studied 30 days mortality, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, total blood loss and complications. RESULTS: Fifteen eEVAR procedures (26.8%) were performed. Mortality in the eEVAR-group was 26%, in the open repair-group 46%. Mean intensive care unit stay was 3.9 days and 4.8 days in the eEVAR-group and open repair-group, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 13 days and 10.5 days. The average blood loss was 210cc and 2760cc. The amount of blood products for transfusion was significantly higher in the open repair. Overall complication rate was not significantly different in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment in a Dutch general hospital of a RAAA with an eEVAR procedure has a lower mortality in comparison to the open repair. Therefore, whenever possible the eEVAR is the preferred treatment method.

Surgical removal of an infected aortic endoprosthesis using a wire cutter.

The purpose of this study is to report a new method of removing an infected endoprosthesis from the abdominal aorta using a wire cutter. A 65-year-old man with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was admitted to our hospital. He was treated with an endovascular abdominal endoprosthesis and discharged one week later. Three months after placement, the patient returned with an infection of the aortic endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis had been fixed with barbs and hooks above the renal arteries and was surgically explanted by using a wire cutter to cut the hooks. The bare suprarenal stent was left in place. The patient was discharged one month after stent removal, and was treated with oral antibiotics for another ten weeks. At one year follow-up the patient showed no clinical, biochemical, or radiological signs of infection. In conclusion, infected endoprostheses should be surgically removed according to the medical literature. We recognize that removing a Zenith endoprostheses requires a dangerous operation because the hooks of the bare stent are engaged into the supra-renal aorta. This case report documents a new technique to safely remove an infected endoprosthesis with the help of a wire cutter.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with Zenith graft. Complications caused by leg extensions.

AIM: A large amount of Zenith endovascular stent complications is due to problems with the leg extensions. This kind of complication has never been reported in literature. The aim of this study was to monitor the complications of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with the Zenith endovascular graft occurred in the Amphia Ziekenhuis in Breda to see how many recurrences were due to leg extension. METHODS: The study enrolled all patients (N.=66) treated with the Zenith endograft in the period between October 2000 and September 2006. Mortality, complications and the number of reinterventions were analysed. Average age of the patients was 73.4 years, average follow-up was 24.5 months and average aneurysm size was 61.5 mm. Radiologic follow-up was performed by computed tomography scans and X-rays. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality rate was 0%. The overall mortality rate during follow-up was 3%. Ten patients required a total number of 12 reinterventions (15%). The average time for reintervention was 10 months after the primary operation. Mortality, complication and reintervention rates were comparable with those reported in the literature, but 75% of these reinterventions were related to the leg extensions. CONCLUSION: Authors observed that nine out of 12 complications which required reintervention were due to problems with one of the leg extensions. This is the first study that specifies clearly the percentage of problems with leg extensions in EVAR (75%). When placing a Zenith endovascular graft extra attention should be paid to optimal placement of the leg extensions.

[Abdominal pain as a symptom of a late complication following endovascular treatment of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta]. / Abdominale pijn als symptoom van een late complicatie na endovasculaire behandeling van een aneurysma van de abdominale aorta.

A 72-year-old man presented with progressive pain in the left lower abdomen thought to be due to diverticulitis of the colon. Antimicrobial therapy had not reduced the symptoms. Four years before, during an endovascular procedure, the patient had been given a stent because of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A CT scan showed a large retroperitoneal haematoma on the left side and an increased diameter of the AAA of 8.5 cm. X-rays showed a gap between the endovascular stent and the left iliac leg of the endoprosthesis. Due to the space between the two grafts, there was retroperitoneal leakage ofblood. In endovascular surgery this life-threatening situation is called a type III endoleak. The patient was operated immediately using the endovascular technique. Through the left femoral artery a new coated stent was positioned over the gap, which led to rapid recovery of the patient. Patients with abdominal pain and a history of a vascular endoprosthesis should be given a CT scan and plain radiography to exclude an endoleak.

Non invasive treatment of peri-aortic inflammation after endovascular graft.

INTRODUCTION: Peri-aortitis is a rare and severe complication of endovascular treatment. REPORT: Two cases of peri-aortic inflammation are reported after receiving an abdominal endoprosthesis as treatment for abdominal aneurysm. Both patients were successfully treated with high doses of prednisone and the grafts were left in situ. DISCUSSION: High doses of prednisone may be the treatment of choice for post endovascular peri-aortitis.

Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance.

A prospective study was undertaken to compare MR imaging of the knee obtained with low-field and high-field systems. In 10 subjects, MR imaging of the knee was performed on a 0.2 T permanent magnet and on a 1.5 T superconductive system. Similar spin echo (SE) and 3D-FISP (3D Fourier transform with steady state precession) acquisitions were obtained. Comparative image analysis was performed independently by four radiologists. Results show that the image quality and diagnostic performance delivered by state-of-the-art 0.2 T and 1.5 T systems is equivalent. Advantages of the 1.5 T system included: better signal-to-noise ratio, shorter scan times, better visualization of asymptomatic grade 1 meniscal degeneration on SE images. Advantages of 0.2 T images were: decreased chemical shift, susceptibility and flow artifacts, improved evaluation of subchondral bone on 3D-FISP images, slightly better patient tolerance. We conclude that, for MR imaging of the knee, a low-field system is a cost-effective alternative to more expensive superconducting units.