Cosensitization to the 3 Nonhomologous Major Cashew Allergens Ana o 1, Ana o 2, and Ana o 3 Is Caused by IgE Cross-reactivity

Background: Cashew nuts often cause strong allergic reactions, which are even more severe than those of peanuts. Ana o 1 (vicilin), Ana o 2 (legumin), and Ana o 3 (2S albumin) are major cashew allergens. Cosensitization to all 3 nonhomologous cashew nut allergens has been observed. We hypothesize that this might be due to IgE cross-reactivity. Methods: IgE cross-inhibitions were performed with Ana o 1-3 using serum samples from cashew nut–allergic patients. The related hazelnut allergens Cor a 11, 9, and 14 were used as controls. For comparison, IgE cross-reactivity between the hazelnut allergens was investigated using serum samples from hazelnut-allergic patients. Results: The median percentages of cross-inhibition between Ana o 1, 2, and 3 were 84%-99%. In comparison, the median cross- inhibition values between hazelnut allergens were 33%-62%. The IC50 values revealed the highest IgE affinity to be to Ana o 3 and Cor a 14. Hazelnut legumin Cor a 9 inhibited IgE binding to Ana o 1, 2, and 3, with median percentages of 75%, 56%, and 48%, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed between allergenic vicilins or between 2S albumins from cashew and hazelnut. Potentially cross-reactive peptides of Ana o 3 identified in silico overlapped with previously reported IgE epitopes of all 3 allergens. Conclusion: IgE with high affinity to Ana o 3 that cross-reacts with the other 2 major nonhomologous cashew nut allergens might be responsible for the high allergenic potency of cashew nut. These cross-reactive IgE types comprise the major fraction of specific IgE in cashew-allergic patients and might be responsible for cross-reactivity between unrelated tree nuts (AU)

Antecedentes: Los anacardos suelen provocar fuertes reacciones alérgicas, que son incluso más graves que las del maní. Ana o 1 (vicilina), Ana o 2 (legumina) y Ana o 3 (albúmina 2S) son los principales alérgenos del anacardo. Se ha observado cosensibilización a los 3 alérgenos no homólogos del anacardo. Nuestra hipótesis es que esto podría deberse a la reactividad cruzada de la IgE. Métodos : Se realizaron inhibiciones cruzadas de IgE con Ana o 1-3 utilizando muestras de suero de pacientes alérgicos al anacardo. Como controles se utilizaron los alérgenos de avellana relacionados Cor a 11, 9 y 14. A modo de comparación, se investigó la reactividad cruzada de IgE entre los alérgenos de la avellana utilizando muestras de suero de pacientes alérgicos a la avellana. Resultados : Los porcentajes medios de inhibición cruzada entre Ana o 1, 2 y 3 fueron del 84% al 99%. En comparación, los valores medios de inhibición cruzada entre alérgenos de avellana fueron del 33% al 62%. Los valores de IC50 revelaron que la mayor afinidad de IgE era Ana o 3 y Cor a 14. La legumina de avellana Cor a 9 inhibió la unión de IgE a Ana o 1, 2 y 3, con porcentajes medios de 75%, 56% y 48%. , respectivamente. No se observó reactividad cruzada entre vicilinas alergénicas ni entre albúminas 2S de anacardo y avellana. Los péptidos potencialmente de reacción cruzada de Ana o 3 identificados in silico se superpusieron con epítopos de IgE previamente informados de los 3 alérgenos. Conclusión : La IgE con alta afinidad por Ana o 3 que reacciona de forma cruzada con los otros 2 alérgenos principales no homólogos del anacardo podría ser responsable de la alta potencia alergénica del anacardo. Estos tipos de IgE de reacción cruzada comprenden la fracción principal de IgE específica en pacientes alérgicos al anacardo y podrían ser responsables de la reactividad cruzada entre frutos secos no relacionados (AU)

Co-sensitization to the three non-homologous major cashew allergens Ana o 1, Ana o 2 and Ana o 3 is caused by IgE cross-reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Cashew nuts often cause strong allergic reactions, even exceeding those of peanuts. Ana o 1 (vicilin), Ana o 2 (legumin) and Ana o 3 (2S albumin) are major cashew allergens. Co-sensitization to all three non-homologous cashew nut allergens has been observed. We hypothesize that this might be due to IgE cross-reactivity. METHODS: IgE cross-inhibitions were performed with Ana o 1-3 using sera from cashew nut allergic patients. Related hazelnut allergens Cor a 11, 9 and 14 were used as controls. For comparison, IgE cross-reactivity between the hazelnut allergens was investigated using sera from hazelnut allergic patients. RESULTS: Median percentages of cross-inhibitions between Ana o 1-3 were 84-99%. In comparison, medians of cross-inhibitions between hazelnut allergens were 33-62%. The IC50 values revealed the highest IgE affinity to Ana o 3 and Cor a 14. Hazelnut legumin Cor a 9 inhibited IgE-binding to Ana o 1, 2, and 3 with median percentages of 75%, 56%, and 48%, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed between allergenic vicilins or between 2S albumins from cashew and hazelnut. In silico identified potentially cross-reactive peptides of Ana o 3 overlapped with previously reported IgE epitopes of all three allergens. CONCLUSIONS: IgE with high affinity to Ana o 3 that cross-reacts with the other two major non-homologous cashew nut allergens might be responsible for the high allergenic potency of cashew nut. These cross-reactive IgE comprises the major fraction of specific IgE in cashew allergic patients, and might be responsible for cross-reactivity between unrelated tree nuts.

Concomitant sensitization to legumin, Fag e 2 and Fag e 5 predicts buckwheat allergy.

BACKGROUND: Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) has become increasingly popular as a healthy food in Europe. However, for sensitized individuals, consumption can cause anaphylactic reactions. The aim of this study was to identify individual well-characterized buckwheat allergens for component-resolved diagnosis. METHODS: Patients were selected by positive skin prick test to buckwheat and divided into two groups: (1) sensitized to buckwheat without clinical symptoms and (2) buckwheat allergy. Buckwheat proteins were extracted from raw buckwheat seeds, purified applying a combination of protein precipitation and chromatographic methods, and analyzed by IgE immunoblotting and ELISA. RESULTS: Buckwheat-allergic patients had a significantly larger median skin prick test weal diameter for buckwheat than the sensitized group and the positive control. Also, IgE immunoblotting clearly showed a distinct pattern in sera from allergic patients when compared to sensitized individuals. Several IgE-reactive proteins were purified from crude buckwheat extract, namely legumin (Fag e 1 plus its large subunit), Fag e 2 (2S albumin), and newly identified Fag e 5 (vicilin-like) as well as hevein-like antimicrobial peptides, designated Fag e 4. All four allergens showed superior diagnostic precision compared to extract-based ImmunoCAP with high sensitivity as well as high specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinical symptoms clearly show a distinct allergen recognition pattern. We characterized a buckwheat vicilin-like protein as a new relevant marker allergen, designated Fag e 5. Additionally, another new allergen, Fag e 4, potentially important for cross-reactivity to latex was added to the allergen panel of buckwheat. Further, our data show that the full-length legumin comprising both, large and small subunit should be applied for component-resolved diagnosis. Our data indicate that concomitant sensitization to legumin, Fag e 2 and Fag e 5, predicts buckwheat allergy.

Analgesic-induced chronic headache: long-term results of withdrawal therapy.

Headache characteristics are described in 139 patients with chronic daily or almost daily headaches due to regular intake of analgesics and the short- and long-term results of drug withdrawal. Drug-induced headache was described as dull, diffuse, and band-like, and usually started in the early morning. The mean duration of the original headache (migraine or tension headache) was 25 years; regular intake of drugs and chronic daily headache had started 10 and 6 years prior to withdrawal therapy, respectively. Patients took an average of 34.6 tablets or analgesic suppositories or antimigraine drugs per week containing 5.8 different substances. The drugs most often used were caffeine (95%), ergotalkaloids (89%), barbiturates (64%), and spasmolytics, paracetamol, and pyrazolone derivates (45%-46%). A total of 103 patients (68 migraine, 35 tension or combination headache) were available for interviews at a mean time interval of 2.9 years after an inpatient drug withdrawal programme. Chronic headache had disappeared or was reduced by more than 50% in two-thirds of the patients. Positive predictors for successful treatment were migraine as primary headache, chronic headache lasting less than 10 years, and regular intake of ergotamine. Drug intake was significantly reduced and patients used single substances more often. Patients who originally suffered from migraine, superimposed on the daily headache, also experienced a significant improvement in the frequency of the migraines and their intensity. Migraine prophylaxis through beta-blocking agents and calcium channel antagonists was more efficient after drug-withdrawal therapy.