Italian survey on the effectiveness of halotherapy administered via the Aerosal® system.

Over the years, halotherapy (HT) has shown promise in the treatment of respiratory and dermatological diseases. However, its widespread acceptance remains limited due to the absence of official guidelines and awareness among doctors and patients. Among the patented systems of administration of HT, Aerosal® is the only one consisting of 3 certified elements, all classified as Medical Devices Class 2A: a dry saline dispenser called Aerosalmed®, a 30 g salt dose named AeroNaCL®, and a confined environment in marine multilayered construction with walls coated in salt called Aerosal®. We conducted an online survey of subjects undergoing Aerosal® HT across 80 Italian centers. Participants provided demographic data, reasons for choosing HT, and perceptions of its effectiveness. Following 10 treatment sessions, they rated improvements in various aspects, such as skin condition, sleep quality, relaxation, and respiratory benefits. Most participants learned about HT through word of mouth rather than medical advice, suggesting a discrepancy between patient satisfaction and medical endorsement. Over 92% reported resolution of their health issues post-treatment, with significant improvements in sleep quality and relaxation, particularly in adults. The therapy showed promise in various conditions, including respiratory and skin disorders, possibly attributed to stress reduction and intrinsic therapeutic effects. Despite skepticism, HT administered through the Aerosal® system has shown therapeutic potential. The psycho-physical benefits observed in patients advocate for greater consideration of this therapy by clinicians, emphasizing its safety, tolerability, and absence of notable side effects. In this context, standardized systems like Aerosal® are crucial for ensuring treatment safety and efficacy.

Reappraisal of Pidotimod: an immunomodulatory agent with 30-year evidence.

Pidotimod (3-L-pyroglutamyl-L-thiaziolidine-4-carboxylic acid) is a synthetic dipeptide with immunomodulatory properties that is indicated for use in adults and children over 3 years of age with documented cell-mediated immunodepression during respiratory and urinary tract infections. Infections are associated with an immune response that helps fight pathogens. In this scenario, inflammatory events occur to improve the antimicrobial reaction. However, defective immunity and/or sustained inflammation may adversely affect the course of the infection. Thus, modulating immune function could be a valuable option in managing patients with infections. The multifaceted mechanism of action of Pidotimod enables it to modulate innate and adaptive immunity. Extensive evidence about Pidotimod, accumulated over the last 30 years, has provided much data on the prevention of recurrent respiratory infections in susceptible children and respiratory exacerbations in patients with chronic bronchitis. Recent studies provide interesting information on how Pidotimod affects the metabolomic profiles of patients with bronchiectasis, clinical and immunological outcomes of elderly patients with pneumonia, clinical and cellular changes in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, and beneficial effects on cytokines and humoral immunity in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. Preliminary experience suggests that Pidotimod can shorten the duration of COVID-19 infection and reduce clinical severity by modulating the immune response, as well as prevent vaccination-related adverse events. In conclusion, the immunomodulatory properties of Pidotimod indicate that it may be a valuable option in managing patients with respiratory infections and other immune-mediated disorders, including allergy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma.

Dupilumab's impact on nasal citology: Real life experience after 1 year of treatment.

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents are considered a new revolutionized therapy for severe and recurrent forms of CRSwNP which disease burden is not sufficiently controlled by conservative and/or surgical treatments. Recent Research has focused on evaluating their real-life efficacy in CRSwNP, as only limited reports on real-life data are available. However, in most studies, the response to treatment is evaluated in terms of improvement in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) or in Sino-Nasal Outcome test (SNOT-22) scores. However, both criteria do not consider nasal immunophlogosis, which can be easily assessed by nasal cytology. The aim of our study was to evaluate changings in the nasal inflammatory infiltrate of CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab for 12 months. METHODS: 27 patients suffering from severe CRSwNP treated with Dupilumab were recruited. Nasal cytology findings, NPS, SNOT-22, ACT scores and blood eosinophil count at T0 (before treatment) and at T1 (after 1 year of treatment) were compared. RESULTS: After 1 year of biological therapy with Dupilumab, NPS, SNOT-22 and, among the 17 asthmatic patients, ACT scores improved significantly. At T1, a statistically significant percentage of patients showed negative citology. Moreover, a significant reduction in the mast cell-eosinophilic pattern and an increase of neutrophils and bacteria was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The response to treatment can be considered both in the case of negative nasal cytology and in the case of the appearance of neutrophils and bacteria. In this context, eosinophils, the specific target of biological therapies, play a crucial role in regulating tissue homeostasis and, consequently, the nasal immunophlogosis.

Multidisciplinary Decision-Making-ITAlian Consensus After Two Years of Real Practice on the Management of Severe Uncontrolled CRSwNP by Biologics (ITACA Study).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aimed to reach an Italian multidisciplinary consensus on some crucial aspects of treatment decision making in CRSwNP, following 2 years of clinical experience in order to support specialists in the management of CRSwNP in clinical practice. We addressed issues relating to therapeutic decision-making and shared criteria for the treatment choice, as well as appropriate timing and criteria for evaluating treatment response, and highlighted the need for repeated multidisciplinary assessments. RECENT FINDINGS: A national survey has been conducted recently to understand how rhinology practice has changed in Italy with the advent of biologics and how this affects patients with uncontrolled, severe CRSwNP. Despite the many published consensus documents, practical recommendations, and protocols on the use of biologics in CRSwNP, heterogenous behaviors in practice are still observed mainly conditioned by the novelty of the topic. The consensus procedure followed a modified Delphi approach. The scientific board included 18 otorhinolaryngologists and 8 allergists, who selected the 4 main topics to be addressed and developed overall 20 statements. Consensus on these statements was sought by a larger group of 48 additional experts, through two rounds of voting, the first web-based, the second in presence with discussion and possible refinement of the statements. The statements reaching an average score ≥ 7 at the second voting round were approved. Five statements were proposed for each of the following topics: baseline evaluation of patients eligible for biologic therapy; choice between different therapeutic options; assessment of the response to biologic treatment; multidisciplinary management. At the first voting round, 19 out of the 20 statements reached a mean score ≥ 7. Following the discussion and a few consequent amendments, at the second round of voting all the 20 statements were approved.

Diagnostic therapeutic assistance pathway (PDTA) of type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex and heterogeneous disorder whose etiopathogenetic picture is not yet completely known and is classically divided into CRS with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). But today the distinction is made with type 2 and nontype 2 variants. A rational and defined pathway for the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis is an indispensable means to be able to arrive at a correct identification of the patient. This typing is essential to be able to arrive at the correct course of treatment, which turns out to be different for different types of patients. For this reason, the realization of a diagnostic therapeutic pathway represents a fundamental way for the otolaryngologist specialist but not only, since today diagnostics has a multidisciplinary framework. In the present work, precise indications have been developed to arrive at a correct diagnosis. The various diagnostic pathways and processes to arrive at a correct therapeutic framing have been highlighted. Therapy ranging from medical therapy to surgical therapy without neglecting the new biological therapies. It does not represent a guideline but a diagnostic method that can be adapted to all the various territorial realities.

Proposal for a new diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nose and the paranasal sinuses characterized by the presence of nasal polyps and persistent symptoms of nasal obstruction, anterior or posterior rhinorrhea, facial pain or pressure, and reduction or loss of smell, lasting longer than 12 weeks. Several therapeutic strategies are nowadays available to treat CRSwNP as a function of disease severity. However, a standardized therapeutic algorithm has not yet been proposed. Since CRSwNP severity can be assessed by the Clinical-Cytological Grading (CCG) and the consequent reduction in patients' Quality of Life can be defined with the Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), we aimed to propose a new diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm, that takes into consideration both the characteristics of the patients, including the CCG, nasal obstruction, and SNOT-22, and all the therapies available today.

Eosinophil-mast cell pattern of intraepithelial infiltration as a marker of severity in CRSwNP.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is defined as a Type 2 eosinophilic disease, while CRSsNP is considered a Type 1 neutrophilic disease. Since neutrophils are also activated in eosinophilic CRSwNP, the eosinophil-neutrophil dualism has been revaluated. Among the inflammatory cells infiltrating sinus-nasal tissues, the role of mast cells (MCs) is not already recognized, although Clinical-Cytological Grading, which defines the severity of CRSwNP, attributes to mixed eosinophil-MC forms of CRSwNP a greater risk of recurrence. We aimed to examine nasal polyps from both a cytological and histopathological point of view, to evaluate the presence and localization of MCs. Cytological and histological examination of 39 samples of nasal polyps were performed. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the presence of Tryptase + CD117 + MCs, which were counted both in the epithelial layer and in the lamina propria. A statistically significant correlation was found between intraepithelial MCs and CRSwNP severity (p < 0.001) and between the total eosinophil count and the total mast cell count (p < 0.001). Cytological examination and immunohistochemistry were comparable in detecting the presence of intraepithelial MCs (p = 0.002). The histological cut-off of 6 intraepithelial MCs was identified to detect severe CRSwNP (p < 0.001). MCs have been shown to be located in the lamina propria of almost all eosinophilic nasal polyps without significantly affecting their severity. Intraepithelial MCs are associated with greater severity of CRSwNP. Histopathological criteria of the eosinophil-MC form of CRSwNP in addition to the eosinophilic one, should be defined to guarantee patients effective and tailored treatments.

Perspectives of Italian Physicians and Patients in the Treatment of Otitis Externa: A Real-Life Study.

(1) Background: Otitis externa (OE) is a common inflammatory disease of the external ear canal. Given the numerous manifestations of OE, the high rate of recurrence of the disease, as well as the emergence of resistance to antibiotics, therapeutic strategies are numerous and still not well standardized. The aim of this study was to investigate the patient journey of Italian patients suffering from OE, paying greater attention to new therapeutic options. (2) Methods: We conducted a national survey to evaluate the characteristics of patients affected by OE and to analyze the most-prescribed treatments. (3) Results: OE is a common, often relapsing disease that has several clinical manifestations. Prior to observation, the combination of corticosteroids and topical antibiotics was the most common therapeutic strategy. At the time of observation, new liposomal ozone-based preparations were the most-prescribed treatment. (4) Conclusions: This multi-center study investigated key aspects of the OE patient journey, highlighting the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. Restoring a correct ear microbiome is the therapeutic goal. In this context, new liposomal ozone-based drugs represent a promising therapeutic strategy.

Nasal cytology and histology in CRSwNP: Two sides of the same coin.

Knowledge of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has increased rapidly over the past decade. However, the study of the histological features of nasal polyps has not gone hand in hand with the study of the inflammatory mechanisms underlying CRSwNP. Indeed, precisely because they are benign neoformations, nasal polyps have not attracted the attention of pathologists over the years. Nasal cytology has shown that CRSwNP, generally defined as a Type-2 disease, is characterized not only by eosinophilic but also mast cell inflammation and, in particular, the most severe forms of CRSwNP are precisely characterized by a mixed eosinophilic-mast cell inflammation. Interestingly, mast cells cannot be visualized by histology due to limitations in staining and magnification, and therefore are not commonly described in histological reports of nasal polyps. However, immunohistochemistry can highlight these latter cells and specifically this technique has recently demonstrated that mast cells are located in the lamina propria of almost all types of polyps and in the epithelial level of the most severe forms. Unfortunately, the latter technique is not commonly carried out in clinical practice by virtue of the high cost and time burden. On the other hand, nasal cytology is an easy-to-apply and economic diagnostic tool, commonly practiced in rhinological setting, which can effectively fill the gap between histology and immunohistochemistry, allowing to non-invasively establish the endotype of nasal polyps and to highlight all cytotypes, including mast cells, that cannot be visualized by the other two techniques. The recent demonstration of the close correlation between mast cell intraepithelial infiltrate and CRSwNP severity paves the way for new therapeutic possibilities aimed at reducing not only eosinophilic infiltration but also mast cell infiltration.