Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 123(11): 1586-1595.e4, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37257691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether the effectiveness of workplace wellness programs differs by employees' baseline health behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association of baseline cafeteria food choices with the effect of a workplace intervention on cafeteria food choices, dietary quality, and body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the ChooseWell 365 randomized controlled trial, testing a set of behavioral interventions to improve diet and prevent weight gain. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants were 602 employees of a Boston, MA, hospital who had purchased food from cafeterias, which used traffic-light food labeling. Data were collected in 2016-2020. INTERVENTION: The 12-month intervention (plus 12 months' follow-up) involved financial incentives and personalized feedback on cafeteria purchases. The control group received monthly letters with generic healthy eating and exercise tips. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthy purchasing scores (HPS) were calculated by weighting color categories (red = 0, yellow = 0.5, green = 1) and scaling from 0 to 100 (healthiest); employees were categorized into baseline (pre-intervention) HPS tertiles (T1 = least healthy, T3 = healthiest). Healthy eating index (HEI-2015) scores were calculated from two 24-hour dietary recalls. Intervention effects on 12- and 24-month changes in HPS (primary outcome), HEI-2015 score, and BMI were compared among tertiles. Subgroup analyses examined whether changes by tertile varied with financial rewards received. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Adjusting for baseline characteristics, multivariable linear regression assessed intervention effects across baseline HPS tertiles. RESULTS: Compared with T3, T1 employees had lower education; higher obesity, hypertension, and pre-diabetes; and lower HEI-2015 scores. The intervention increased HPS, but no change was observed in HEI-2015 scores or BMI; the intervention effect did not differ among tertiles at 12 or 24 months. Financial incentives were associated with a larger effect on 12-month HPS changes for T1 than for T2/T3 (P-interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with employees with healthier baseline food choices, employees with the least healthy food choices and highest cardiometabolic risk had similar improvements in the nutritional quality of cafeteria purchases as a result of the behavioral intervention, and they appeared to be more responsive to financial incentives.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Preferencias Alimentarias , Humanos , Dieta , Alimentos , Lugar de Trabajo
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 63(1): 93-101, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282955

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy and numeracy are linked to obesity and dietary behaviors. This study investigates whether the effect of a workplace behavioral intervention to prevent weight gain and improve diet differed by employee health literacy and numeracy. METHODS: ChooseWell 365 was an RCT of hospital employees testing a 12-month intervention using nudges and feedback to promote healthier choices, building on existing cafeteria traffic light labels (e.g., green=healthy, red=unhealthy). Health literacy and numeracy were measured with the Newest Vital Sign (range=0-6) and General Numeracy Scale (range=0-3). Mixed-effects linear models examined if intervention effects on cafeteria purchases, diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2015, range=0-100), and weight change over 24 months differed by higher versus lower health literacy or numeracy. Data were collected in 2016-2020 and analyzed in 2020-2021. RESULTS: In 12 months, 510 participants completed the Newest Vital Sign and General Numerancy Scale; 36.7% had Newest Vital Sign<6 (lower health literacy) and 31.6% had General Numerancy Scale<2 (lower numeracy). Intervention participants increased healthy purchases over 24 months compared with controls in both higher and lower health literacy and numeracy groups. At 12 months, Healthy Eating Index 2015 scores increased in intervention versus control participants with lower health literacy (5.5 points, 95% CI=1.51, 9.54) but not in those with higher health literacy (p-interaction=0.040). BMI did not differ by health literacy or numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: A behavioral intervention improved cafeteria food choices of hospital employees of varying health literacy and numeracy levels and improved diet quality among employees with lower health literacy, suggesting this group also improved food choices outside of work.


Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Lugar de Trabajo , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Preferencias Alimentarias , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2112528, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34097048

RESUMEN

Importance: Personalized interventions that leverage workplace data and environments could improve effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability of employee wellness programs. Objective: To test an automated behavioral intervention to prevent weight gain and improve diet using employee cafeteria purchasing data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This individual-level randomized clinical trial of a 12-month intervention with 12 months of follow-up was conducted among employees of a hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, who purchased food at on-site cafeterias that used traffic-light labels (ie, green indicates healthy; yellow, less healthy; red, unhealthy). Participants were enrolled September 2016 to February 2018. Data were analyzed from May to September 2020. Interventions: For 12 months, participants in the intervention group received 2 emails per week with feedback on previous cafeteria purchases and personalized health and lifestyle tips and 1 letter per month with peer comparisons and financial incentives for healthier purchases. Emails and letters were automatically generated using survey, health, and cafeteria data. Control group participants received 1 letter per month with general healthy lifestyle information. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was change in weight from baseline to 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in cafeteria purchases, including proportion of green- and red-labeled purchases and calories purchased per day, from baseline (12 months preintervention) to the intervention (months 1-12) and follow-up (months 13-24) periods. Baseline Healthy Eating Index-15 (HEI-15) scores were compared to HEI-15 scores at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: Among 602 employees enrolled (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [12.2] years; 478 [79.4%] women), 299 were randomized to the intervention group and 303 were randomized to the control group. Baseline mean (SD) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 28.3 (6.6) and HEI-15 score was 60.4 (12.4). There were no between-group differences in weight change at 12 (0.2 [95% CI, -0.6 to 1.0] kg) or 24 (0.6 [95% CI, -0.3 to 1.4] kg) months. Compared with baseline, the intervention group increased green-labeled purchases by 7.3% (95% CI, 5.4% to 9.3%) and decreased red-labeled purchases by 3.9% (95% CI, -5.0% to -2.7%) and calories purchased per day by 49.5 (95% CI, -75.2 to -23.9) kcal more than the control group during the intervention period. In the intervention group, differences in changes in green (4.8% [95% CI, 2.9% to 6.8%]) and red purchases (-3.1% [95% CI, -4.3% to -2.0%]) were sustained at the 24-month follow-up. Differences in changes in HEI-15 scores were not significantly different in the intervention compared with the control group at 6 (2.2 [95% CI, 0 to 4.4]), 12 (1.8 [95% CI, -0.6 to 4.1]), and 24 (1.6, 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.8]) months. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that an automated behavioral intervention using workplace cafeteria data improved employees' food choices but did not prevent weight gain over 2 years. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02660086.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista/métodos , Dieta Saludable/psicología , Promoción de la Salud , Obesidad/prevención & control , Obesidad/psicología , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/métodos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Boston , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1583, 2019 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775714

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While leisure-time physical activity (PA) has been associated with reduced risk of cardiometabolic disease, less is known about the relationship between work-related PA and health. Work-related PA is often not a chosen behavior and may be associated with lower socioeconomic status and less control over job-related activities. This study examined whether high work-related PA and leisure-time PA reported by hospital employees were associated with healthier dietary intake and reductions in cardiometabolic risk. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 602 hospital employees who used workplace cafeterias and completed the baseline visit for a health promotion study in 2016-2018. Participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and clinical measures of weight, blood pressure, HbA1c, and lipids. Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores were calculated from two 24-h dietary recalls, and a Healthy Purchasing Score was calculated based on healthfulness of workplace food/beverage purchases. Regression analyses examined Healthy Purchasing Score, HEI, and obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes/prediabetes by quartile of work-related PA, leisure-time PA, and sedentary time. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 43.6 years (SD = 12.2), 79.4% were female, and 81.1% were white. In total, 30.3% had obesity, 20.6% had hypertension, 26.6% had prediabetes/diabetes, and 32.1% had hyperlipidemia. Median leisure-time PA was 12.0 (IQR: 3.3, 28.0) and median work-related PA was 14.0 (IQR: 0.0, 51.1) MET-hours/week. Higher leisure-time PA was associated with higher workplace Healthy Purchasing Score and HEI (p's < 0.01) and lower prevalence of obesity, diabetes/prediabetes, and hyperlipidemia (p's < 0.05). Work-related PA was not associated with Healthy Purchasing Score, HEI, or cardiometabolic risk factors. Increased sedentary time was associated with lower HEI (p = 0.02) but was not associated with the workplace Healthy Purchasing Score. CONCLUSIONS: Employees with high work-related PA did not have associated reductions in cardiometabolic risk or have healthier dietary intake as did employees reporting high leisure-time PA. Workplace wellness programs should promote leisure-time PA and healthy food choices for all employees, but programs may need to be customized and made more accessible to meet the unique needs of employees who are physically active at work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02660086) on January 21, 2016. The first participant was enrolled on September 16, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dieta/normas , Ejercicio Físico , Estado de Salud , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Actividades Recreativas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(7): e196789, 2019 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31290988

RESUMEN

Importance: Nearly one-third of the 150 million US adults who are employed are obese. A workplace program that reduces employees' caloric intake could help prevent obesity. Objective: To determine if implementation of a hospital workplace cafeteria healthy eating program was associated with reduction in calories purchased by employees over 2 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: A longitudinal cohort study of 5695 employees who purchased food with their employee identification card before and after implementation of a workplace cafeteria healthy eating program was conducted from December 1, 2009, to February 29, 2012, in a hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Statistical analysis was conducted from April 6, 2018, to May 14, 2019. Exposure: After a 3-month baseline period, "traffic light" food labels (in which green indicates healthy, yellow indicates less healthy, and red indicates least healthy) and choice architecture (product placement) changes were implemented permanently. Main Outcome and Measures: Main outcomes were changes in calories of employees' purchases from baseline (December 1, 2009, to February 28, 2010) to the same quarter 1 year (December 1, 2010, to February 28, 2011) and 2 years (December 1, 2011, to February 29, 2012) later. Purchases were obtained from sales data linked to employee identification cards. The hypothesized association of estimated changes in daily calories consumed with employees' weight was calculated using a dynamic model of weight change. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and job type. Results: Among the 5695 employees in the study, 4057 were women and 1638 were men, and the mean (SD) age was 40 (12) years. Baseline purchases had a mean of 565 kcal per transaction (95% CI, 558-572 kcal) and decreased 19 kcal per transaction (95% CI, -23 to -15 kcal) at 1 year and 35 kcal per transaction (95% CI, -39 to -31 kcal) at 2 years (-6.2%; P < .001) relative to baseline. The largest reduction was from red-labeled items, decreasing 42 kcal per transaction at 2 years (95% CI, -45 to -39 kcal) from a mean of 183 kcal per transaction (95% CI, 177-188 kcal) at baseline (-23.0%; P < .001). Calories from green-labeled items increased 6 kcal per transaction (95% CI, 3-9 kcal) from a mean of 152 kcal per transaction (95% CI, 149-155 kcal) (4.0%; P < .001), and calories from yellow-labeled items did not change. Among frequent purchasers (≥36 transactions per quarter; n = 453), total kilocalories per quarter at baseline was 41 784, which, averaged over the entire follow-up, decreased a mean of 4275 kcal/quarter (95% CI, -5325 to -3224 kcal) over 2 years. Assuming no compensatory changes in diet or activity, this equated to a reduction of 47 kcal per day and estimated a 2.0-kg weight loss over 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance: A workplace cafeteria traffic light-labeling and choice architecture program was associated with a sustained decrease in calories purchased, particularly from unhealthy foods. Point-of-purchase programs could help improve dietary intake and prevent obesity in employees.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable/métodos , Ingestión de Energía , Etiquetado de Alimentos/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Obesidad , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/métodos , Adulto , Conducta de Elección , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Obesidad/prevención & control , Obesidad/psicología , Salud Laboral
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 57(1): 87-94, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128960

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most Americans spend half their waking hours at work and consume food acquired there. The hypothesis was that the healthfulness of worksite food purchases was associated with employees' overall diet and health. METHODS: Participants were 602 hospital employees who regularly used worksite cafeterias and enrolled in a health promotion study in 2016-2018. All cafeterias used traffic-light labels (green=healthy, yellow=less healthy, red=unhealthy). A Healthy Purchasing Score was calculated for each participant by summing weighted proportions of cafeteria items purchased over a 3-month observation period (red=0, yellow=0.5, green=1; range, 0-1). Healthy Eating Index scores (range, 0-100) were calculated based on two 24-hour dietary recalls. BMI, blood pressure, and HbA1c were measured. Hypertension and prediabetes/diabetes diagnoses were determined by self-reported and clinical data. Regression analyses examined dietary quality and diagnoses by tertile of Healthy Purchasing Score (T1=least healthy purchases, T3=most healthy), adjusting for demographics. All data were collected before the start of the intervention and were analyzed in 2018. RESULTS: Mean age was 43.6 years (SD=12.2), 79% were female, and 81% were white. Mean BMI was 28.3 kg/m2 (SD=6.5); 21% had hypertension, and 27% had prediabetes/diabetes. Mean Healthy Eating Index was 60.4 (SD=12.5); mean Healthy Purchasing Score was 0.66 (SD=0.15). Healthier purchases were associated with healthier Healthy Eating Index scores (T1=55.6, T2=61.0, T3=64.5, p<0.001) and lower obesity prevalence (T1=38%, T2=29%, T3=24%, p<0.001); similar patterns were observed for hypertension and prediabetes/diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Worksite food purchases were associated with overall dietary quality and cardiometabolic risk. Interventions to increase healthfulness of food choices at work may improve employees' health.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable/estadística & datos numéricos , Preferencias Alimentarias , Alimentos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/prevención & control , Personal de Hospital/psicología
7.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 75: 78-86, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Behavioral nudges in the food environment increase healthy choices, but it is unknown if they improve diet and health. The ChooseWell 365 study will determine if an automated, personalized worksite intervention to nudge healthier choices improves overall diet and cardiometabolic health. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of 602 hospital employees who regularly use on-site cafeterias and pay with an employee ID. INTERVENTION: The intervention combines an environmental strategy (traffic-light labeling) with objective feedback and personalized nudges (health/lifestyle tips, social norms, incentives) to promote healthy food choices. The ChooseWell 365 software platform automatically generates personalized emails and letters that integrate employees' weight goals with health, lifestyle, and cafeteria purchasing data. Over one year, the intervention group receives two weekly emails. One provides a log of daily purchases; the second provides personalized health/lifestyle tips. The intervention group receives monthly mailed letters with social norm comparisons and financial incentives for healthier purchases. The one-year intervention will be completed in February 2019; all follow-up will be completed March 2020. OUTCOMES: Weight, cardiometabolic risk factors, and dietary intake at one and two-year follow-up. Other outcomes include worksite food purchases by study participants and other non-participant employees who are socially connected (inferred from purchasing data) to participants. CONCLUSIONS: ChooseWell 365 tests a novel strategy to deliver a scalable worksite prevention program that is integrated into the workday. The intervention is personalized but automated and therefore does not require costlier individual counseling. In the future, this program could be applied broadly in other worksite settings.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Obesidad/prevención & control , Personal de Hospital , Conducta de Elección , Correo Electrónico , Humanos , Motivación , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador , Normas Sociales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...