RESUMEN
Bacterial respiratory tract infections (e.g., in patients with cystic fibrosis) may be treated with the intravenous infusion of a piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) solution through an elastomeric device. In the present work, we combined a 24-h drug stability study with an assessment of the drug solution flow rate during an in vitro simulated infusion. Experiments were performed in triplicate with two excipient-free generic P/T solutions and an excipient-containing proprietary P/T solution in saline (all 50/6.25 mg/mL) released from an elastomeric infusion device at 32 °C. The P/T solutions' stability was assessed by an HPLC-UV assay, pH and osmolality measurements, a visual assessment, and particle counting. Before these analyses, a forced degradation study was performed. To assess the flow rate, a precision scale was used to weigh the solution collected at the infusion line outlet. The stability criteria were <10% degradation and a flow rate within ± 15% of the nominal value over the 24-h infusion period: all three P/T solutions were found to be stable. The actual flow rate was lower than the expected flow rate; this difference was probably due to the drug solution's high viscosity and must be taken into account in clinical use.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Compounding robots are increasingly being implemented in hospital pharmacies. In our hospital, the recent acquisition of a robot (RIVATM, ARxIUM) for intravenous cancer drug compounding obliged us to replace the previously used infusion devices. The objective of the present study was to assess and qualify the new intravenous sets prior to their use in our hospital and prior to the implementation of the compounding robot. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ChemoLockTM (ICU Medical) was compared with the devices used previously for compounding (BD PhaSealTM, Becton-Dickinson) and infusion (Connect-ZTM, Codan Medical). The connection/disconnection of infusion devices to/from 50â mL infusion bags was tested with a dynamometer (Multitest-i, Mecmesin). Leakage contamination was visualized by a methylene blue assay and was quantified in simulated pump infusions with 20â mg/mL quinine sulfate (N = 36/group); after the analytical assay had been validated, quinine was detected by UV-spectrophotometry at 280 and 330â nm. Groups were compared using chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The connection/disconnection test showed that although all the devices complied with the current standard, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean ± standard deviation compression force (51.5 ± 11.6 for the Connect-ZTM vs. 60.3 ± 11.7 for the ChemoLockTM; p = 0.0005). Leaks were detected in 32 (29.1%) of the 110 tests of the ChemoLockTM. The contamination rates were also significantly different: 13.9% for the BD PhaSealTM versus 75.0% for the ChemoLockTM; p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the new infusion device complied with current standards. However, the presence of contamination emphasizes the need for operators to use the recommended personal protective equipment. Further studies of contamination with cancer drugs are required.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Exposición Profesional , Robótica , Humanos , Robótica/métodos , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is widely used in the manufacture of medical devices. The plasticizers added to PVC are potentially toxic for humans, likely to migrate, and thus unintentionally administered to patients. The objective of the present study was to reduce the migration of plasticizer (1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, diisononylester (DINCH) or trioctyltrimellitate (TOTM)) from PVC by implementing a three-step surface treatment process: (i) pretreatment with low-pressure argon cold plasma, (ii) polydopamine coating, and (iii) post-treatment with cold plasma exposure or thermal treatment at 140 °C. Samples were then characterized in terms of the water contact angle (WCA) and the aspect in scanning electron microscopy. Plasticizer migration (n = 5) was measured using an HPLC technique with ultraviolet detection and found to depend on the treatment and the plasticizer. Plasticized PVC was hydrophobic, with a measured mean ± standard deviation WCA of 96.7 ± 3.6° for PVC-DINCH and 110.2 ± 5.8° for PVC-TOTM. Plasma post-treatment and thermal post-treatment were respectively associated with a mean decrease in migration of 38.3 ± 1.9% for DINCH and 61.5 ± 4.4% for TOTM. Our results are promising with regard to limiting the migration of plasticizers into the patient's blood and thus enabling the development of safer medical devices.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drug incompatibility is defined as a physical-chemical reaction between two or more injectable drugs and that results mainly in precipitation or insolubility. Several strategies for reducing incompatibilities have been implemented empirically in intensive care units. However, these strategies have never been compared directly (and particularly in terms of the particulate load and drug mass flow rate) under standardized conditions. The objective of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of various strategies for preventing incompatibility between simultaneously infused vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. METHODS: An in-line filter, a dilute vancomycin solution (5 mg/mL), and an alternative saline administration line were evaluated separately. The infusion line outlet was connected to a dynamic particle counter. The antibiotic concentration was measured in an HPLC-UV assay. RESULT: The use of an in-line filter and an alternative saline administration route did not significantly reduce the particulate load caused by vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam incompatibility. Dilution of the vancomycin solution was associated with a significantly lower particulate load and maintenance of the vancomycin mass flow rate. DISCUSSION: It is important to systematically compare the efficacy of strategies for preventing drug incompatibility. The use of diluted vancomycin solution gave the best results in the case of vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam incompatibility.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Dobutamine is an inotropic agent given to patients with low cardiac output or undergoing cardiac surgery in intensive care units. Routine clinical care protocols recommend a target dilution concentration of 10 mg/mL dobutamine from the 250 mg/20 mL commercial solution.This study aimed to assess the 1-year stability of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL diluted dobutamine solutions. Two types of 50 mL conditioning, polypropylene (PP) syringes or cyclic-oleofin-copolymer (COC) vials and two diluents (5% dextrose (D5W) and normal saline (NS)) were tested. METHODS: Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with an ultraviolet detection stability-indicating method was developed for dobutamine and validated according to selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy and precision. Chemical stability was considered to have been maintained if the measured concentrations were >90% of the initial concentration with no colour change. Physical stability was assessed through sterility tests, pH and osmolality monitoring, and subvisible particle counting. Containers were stored at -20±5°C, +5±3°C and +25±2°C with 60%±5% relative humidity in a dark, closed environment. RESULTS: According to this study, the physicochemical stability of 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions prepared with D5W or NS is constant throughout a 365-day period when stored in COC vials, at all the aforementioned temperatures, whereas solutions in PP syringes required a refrigerated temperature and should not be administered after 21 days or 3 months when prepared with D5W or NS, respectively, or after 1 month at ambient temperature whatever the diluent. CONCLUSION: Our results argue in favour of adopting the compounding of ready-to-use 10 mg/mL dobutamine solutions in COC vials in centralised intravenous additive services.
Asunto(s)
Polipropilenos , Solución Salina , Humanos , Polipropilenos/química , Dobutamina , Jeringas , Glucosa/químicaRESUMEN
Phthalates and other plasticisers are extensively used in medical devices (MD) from which they can leach out and lead to potential multiple problems for the patients. This exposure is a major issue because it is associated with reproductive and neurodevelopment disorders. The Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) population is at high risk due to the daily intensive medical interventions, the reduced ability of newborns to remove these contaminants and their higher sensitivity to endocrine disruptors. We conducted a multicentric biomonitoring study to assess and compare the urinary levels of DEHP (di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate), DEHTP (di-(2-ethylhexyl)terephthalate) and TEHTM (tri-(2-ethylhexyl)trimellitate) metabolites as biomarkers of this exposure during and after the newborns' stay in NICU. Daily urinary samples were collected in NICU and at discharge from the hospital for each patient. MD sources and exposure factors were also investigated. 508 urinary samples from 97 patients enrolled in centres 1 and 2 (C1/C2) were collected. The exposure of newborns to DEHP was greater than that of DEHTP and TEHTM, with a median concentration of DEHP metabolites (C1:195.63 ng/mL;C2:450.87 ng/mL) respectively 5 to 10 times higher and 57 to 228 times higher than the median concentrations of DEHTP and TEHTM metabolites. The urinary concentrations of DEHP and TEHTM metabolites were significantly lower at discharge than in NICU, with a 18-and 35-fold decrease for DEHP and a 4 and 8-fold decrease for TEHTM, respectively for C1 and C2, but were similar for DEHTP metabolites. MD used for respiratory assistance, infusion therapy,enteral nutrition and transfusion were the main sources of exposure. Smaller gestational age and body weight significantly increased the newborns' exposure. The elevated levels of DEHP metabolites in NICU patients are still alarming. Additional efforts are necessary to promote its substitution in MD by possibly safer alternatives such as TEHTM and DEHTP, particularly when used for the care of newborns.
Asunto(s)
Disruptores Endocrinos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Ácidos Ftálicos , Plastificantes , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Ácidos Ftálicos/análisis , Plastificantes/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Disruptores Endocrinos/análisis , Biomarcadores/orina , Dietilhexil Ftalato/orinaRESUMEN
Vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are known to be incompatible. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the impact of their simultaneous infusion on mass flow rates and particulate load and identify preventive strategies. We assessed both static conditions and a reproduction of an infusion line used in a hospital's critical care unit. A high-performance liquid chromatography/UV diode array system and static and dynamic laser diffraction particle counters were used. The mass flow rates were primarily influenced by the choice of the infusion device and the presence of simulated fluid volume support. Drug incompatibility also appeared to affect vancomycin's mass flow rate, and the dynamic particulate load increased during flow rate changes - especially in the infusion set with a large common volume line and no concomitant simulated fluid volume support. Only discontinuation of the piperacillin/tazobactam infusion was associated with a higher particulate load in the infusion set with a large common volume line and no concomitant simulated fluid volume support. A low common volume line and the use of simulated fluid volume support were associated with smaller fluctuations in the mass flow rate. The clinical risk associated with a higher particulate load must now be assessed.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Infusiones Parenterales , Incompatibilidad de Medicamentos , Piperacilina , Ácido Penicilánico , Infusiones IntravenosasRESUMEN
Errors in injectable preparations with high-risk drugs can be fatal. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the accuracy of high-risk injectable drug concentrations in appliances used for intensive care unit preparation practices. Norepinephrine (NE) was chosen as an example of a high-risk medication drug. The concentration (0.2 and 0.5 mg/mL), the diluent (sodium chloride 0.9% and 5% dextrose), and the container type (prefilled- and empty-infusion bag and syringe) were tested as potential variability factors. An ultraviolet spectrophotometric method was used for NE dosage. 108 NE solutions were prepared by five individuals (pharmacists or laboratory technicians) with clinical experience as well as experience in the aseptic preparation of solutions. The container type was found to be the only factor influencing the accuracy of NE concentration. NE solutions in syringes proved to be the most accurate while preparations in prefilled bags tended to underdose NE.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the stability of diluted insulin aspart solutions (containing insulin aspart and preservatives) at their most commonly used concentration in intensive care units (1 unit/mL), in 2 container types: cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) vials and polypropylene (PP) syringes. METHODS: Insulin aspart solution (1 unit/mL, diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection) was stored for 365 days in COC vials with gray stoppers and PP syringes at refrigerated (5°C ± 3°C) and ambient temperatures (25°C ± 2°C at 60% ± 5% relative humidity and protected from light). Chemical testing was conducted monthly using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method (quantification of insulin aspart, phenol, and metacresol). Physical stability was evaluated monthly via pH measurements, visible and subvisible particle counts, and osmolality measurements. Sterility testing was also performed to validate the sterile preparation process and the maintenance of sterility throughout the study. RESULTS: The limit of stability was set at 90% of the initial concentrations of insulin aspart, phenol, and metacresol. The physicochemical stability of 1-unit/mL insulin solutions stored refrigerated and protected from light, was unchanged in COC vials for the 365-day period and for 1 month in PP syringes. At ambient temperature, subvisible particulate contamination as well as the chemical stability of insulin and metacresol were acceptable for only 1 month's storage in PP syringes, while insulin chemical stability was maintained for only 3 months' storage in COC vials. CONCLUSION: According to our results, it is not recommended to administer 1-unit/mL pharmacy-diluted insulin solutions after 3 months' storage in COC vials at ambient temperature or after 1 month in PP syringes at ambient temperature. The findings support storage of 1-unit/mL insulin aspart solution in COC vials at refrigerated temperature as the best option over the long term. Sterility was maintained in every condition. Both sterility and physicochemical stability are essential to authorize the administration of a parenteral insulin solution.
Asunto(s)
Cicloparafinas , Jeringas , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Almacenaje de Medicamentos , Humanos , Insulina Aspart , Polipropilenos/químicaRESUMEN
The comments written by R. Otter et al. [...].
RESUMEN
Potentially toxic plasticizers are commonly added to polyvinyl chloride medical devices for transfusion in order to improve their flexibility and workability. As the plasticizers are not chemically bonded to the PVC, they can be released into labile blood products (LBPs) during storage. Ideally, LBPs would be used in laboratory studies of plasticizer migration from the medical device. However, short supply (i.e., limited stocks of human blood in collection centres) has prompted the development of specific simulants for each type of LBP in the evaluation of new transfusion devices. We performed a Delphi study with a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts. In the first (qualitative) phase, the panel developed consensus definitions of the specification criteria to be met by each migration simulant. Next, we reviewed the literature on techniques for simulating the migration of plasticizers into LBPs. A questionnaire was elaborated and sent out to the experts, and the replies were synthesized in order to obtain a consensus. The qualitative study established specifications for each biological matrix (whole blood, red blood cell concentrate, plasma, and platelet concentrate) and defined the criteria required for a suitable LBP simulant. Ten criteria were suggested: physical and chemical characteristics, opacity, form, stability, composition, ability to mimic a particular clinical situation, ease and safety of use, a simulant-plastic interaction correlated with blood, and compatibility with analytical methods. The questionnaire data revealed a consensus on the use of natural products (such as pig's blood) to mimic the four LBPs. Opinions diverged with regard to synthetic products. However, an isotonic solution and a rheological property modifier were considered to be of value in the design of synthetic simulants. Consensus reached by the Delphi group could be used as a database for the development of simulants used to assess the migration of plasticizers from PVC bags into LBPs.
Asunto(s)
Células Sanguíneas/citología , Conservación de la Sangre/instrumentación , Plastificantes/química , Bancos de Sangre , Plaquetas/citología , Conservación de la Sangre/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Técnica Delphi , Eritrocitos/citología , Hematología/normas , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Ensayo de Materiales , Plasma/citología , Cloruro de Polivinilo/química , Propiedades de Superficie , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , ViscosidadRESUMEN
The characterization of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may require the use of several different tools, such as the thesaurus issued by our national health agency (i.e., ANSM), the metabolic pathways table from the Geneva University Hospital (GUH), and DDI-Predictor (DDI-P). We sought to (i) compare the three tools' respective abilities to detect DDIs in routine clinical practice and (ii) measure the pharmacist intervention rate (PIR) and physician acceptance rate (PAR) associated with the use of DDI-P. The three tools' respective DDI detection rates (in %) were measured. The PIRs and PARs were compared by using the area under the curve ratio given by DDI-P (RAUC) and applying a chi-squared test. The DDI detection rates differed significantly: 40.0%, 76.5%, and 85.2% for ANSM (The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products), GUH and DDI-P, respectively (p < 0.0001). The PIR differed significantly according to the DDI-P's RAUC: 90.0%, 44.2% and 75.0% for RAUC ≤ 0.5; RAUC 0.5-2 and RAUC > 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall PAR was 85.1% and did not appear to depend on the RAUC category (p = 0.729). Our results showed that more pharmacist interventions were issued when details of the strength of the DDI were available. The three tools can be used in a complementary manner, with a view to refining medication adjustments.
RESUMEN
Care management of newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) requires numerous PVC (PolyVinyl Chloride) medical devices (MD) containing plasticizers that can migrate and contaminate the patient. We measured the magnitude of neonates' exposure to plasticizers (di-ethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) and alternatives) in relation to urinary concentrations of their metabolites. Plasticizers' exposure was evaluated (1) by calculating the amounts of plasticizers prone to be released from each MD used for care management, and (2) by measuring the patients' urinary levels of each plasticizers' metabolites. 104 neonates were enrolled. They were exposed to di-isononylphthalate (DINP), especially via transfusion and infusion MD, and to DEHP via ECMO (Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation) and respiratory assistance MD. Mean exposure doses exceeded the derived no-effect level of DINP and DEHP by a 10-fold and a 1000-fold factor. No PVC MD were plasticized with di-isononylcyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH). High urinary concentrations of DEHP metabolites were directly correlated with DEHP exposure through ECMO MD. Urinary concentrations of DINP metabolites in transfused patients were also high. DINCH metabolites were found in urine, suggesting another route of exposure. Neonates in NICU are considerably exposed to plasticizers, with magnitudes varying with the type of MD used. The high exposure to DEHP and DINP leads to a risk of their metabolites' toxicity.
RESUMEN
Neonatal hyperglycaemia is frequent and requires insulin therapy. To resolve the difficulties encountered by paediatricians in stabilising glycaemia, the preparation and administration of insulin aspart were assessed and optimised. After high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV) assessment of insulin aspart preparations made according to the old protocol, a new protocol was drawn up. Dosage reliability of solutions prepared by paediatric nurses was evaluated by HPLC-UV. This new protocol was also tested in a Y-infusion situation and the need to saturate infusion tubes assessed. Wide deviations in insulin aspart concentrations were found between theoretical concentrations and preparations made according to the old protocol. Glycated insulin aspart was found in the majority of these preparations. The new protocol significantly reduced the variability of data and relative deviations around the target value. It also eliminated the formation of glycated insulin even in the case of co-infusion of parenteral nutrition and confirmed the need to saturate infusion tubes.Conclusion: The revision of the insulin therapy protocol reduced the variability of insulin concentration in preparations and avoided the administration of glycated derivatives potentially toxic for neonates. What is Known: ⢠Insulin preparation in NICUs is a risky task because it is a two-step preparation ⢠Diluted in dextrose, insulin aspart is unstable, with formation of potentially toxic glycated derivatives What is New: ⢠This work proposes a new insulin therapy protocol validated by HPLC-UV for NICU allowing suppression of the formation of glycated insulin, to significantly reduce deviations from theoretical concentrations and to limit adsorption phenomena ⢠This protocol is validated in case of co-infusion of parenteral nutrition.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia , Insulina Aspart , Glucemia , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes , Recién Nacido , Insulina , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), the simultaneous administration of drugs requires complex infusion methods. Such practices can increase the risk of drug incompatibilities resulting in the formation of a particulate load with possible clinical consequences. METHODS: This paper evaluates strategies to reduce the particulate load of a protocol commonly used in NICUs with a potential medical incompatibility (vancomycin/cefepime combination). The protocol was reproduced in the laboratory and the infusion line directly connected to a dynamic particle counter to evaluate the particulate matter administered during infusion. A spectrophotometry UV assay of cefepime evaluated the impact of filters on the concentration of cefepime administered. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between the two infusion line configurations used in the NICU, with higher particulate load for cefepime infused via the emergency route. There was no change in particulate load in the absence of vancomycin. A filter on the emergency route significantly reduced this load without decreasing the cefepime concentration infused. Preparation of cefepime seemed to be a critical issue in the protocol as the solution initially contained a high level of particles. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the impact of a reconstitution method, drug dilution and choice of infusion line configuration on particulate load.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Drug protocols in intensive care units may require the concomitant administration of many drugs as patients' venous accesses are often limited. A major challenge for clinicians is to limit the risk of simultaneously infusing incompatible drugs. Incompatibilities can lead to the formation of particles and inactivation of drugs, whose consequences on the body have already been indicated. Our objective was to assess current strategies to counter the risk of incompatible infusions and control the resulting clinical consequences. METHODS: This review was independently conducted by three investigators in respect of the PRISMA statement. Three online databases were consulted. Full-text articles, notes, or letters written in English or French, published or in press between the 1990s and the end of February 2020, with clinical study design, were eligible. Parameters of interest were mainly number and size of particles, and a number of observed/avoided incompatibilities. RESULTS: All in all, 382 articles were screened, 17 meeting all the acceptance criteria. The strategies outlined and assessed were filtration, the use of multi-lumen devices, the purging of infusion lines, incompatibility tables and databases, and the use of standard operating procedures. CONCLUSION: Although many strategies have been developed in recent years to address drug incompatibility risks, clinical data is still lacking. All studies with in vitro design were excluded although some current innovative strategies, like niosomes, should be considered and studied by means of clinical data in the future.
Asunto(s)
Incompatibilidad de Medicamentos , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Protocolos Clínicos , Filtración , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phlebitis is a common side effect of vancomycin peripheral intravenous (PIV) infusion. As only one PIV catheter is frequently used to deliver several drugs to hospitalized patients through the same Y-site, perturbation of the infusion flow by hydration or other IV medication may influence vancomycin exposure to endothelial cells and modulate toxicity. METHODS: We assessed the toxicity of variations in vancomycin concentration induced by drug mass flow variations in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), simulating a 24 h multi-infusion therapy on the same line. Results were expressed as the percentage of viable cells compared with a 100% control, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the toxicity of vancomycin. RESULTS: Our results showed that variations in vancomycin concentration did not significantly influence local toxicity compared to a fixed concentration of vancomycin. Nevertheless, the loss of cell viability induced by mechanical trauma mimicking multidrug infusion could increase the risk of phlebitis. CONCLUSION: To ensure that vancomycin-induced phlebitis must have other causes than variation in drug mass flow, further in vitro experiments should be performed to limit mechanical stress to frequent culture medium change.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Midazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative commonly used in intensive care units to control sedation. Its use requires dilution of a 5-mg/mL commercial solution to a target concentration of 1 mg/mL. A study was conducted to evaluate the stability of diluted ready-to-use 1-mg/mL midazolam solutions over 365 days when stored in cyclic olefin copolymer vials or polypropylene syringes. METHODS: A specific stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection method was developed for midazolam hydrochloride and validated for selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, and accuracy. Three storage conditions were tested: -20°C ± 5°C, 5°C ± 3°C, and 25°C ± 2°C at 60% ± 5% relative humidity. Half of the vials were stored upside down to test for the absence of interaction between midazolam and the stopper. Particle contamination, sterility, and pH were assessed. RESULTS: The limit of stability was set at 90% of the initial concentration. After 1 year's storage at -20°C and 5°C, concentrations remained superior to 90% under all storage conditions. At 25°C, stability was maintained up to day 90 in syringes (mean [SD], 92.71% [1.43%]) and to day 180 in upright and upside-down vials (92.12% [0.15%] and 91.57% [0.15%], respectively). No degradation products were apparent, no variations in pH values were detected, and containers retained their sterility and conformity with regard to any specific contamination during the study. CONCLUSION: The evaluated 1-mg/mL midazolam solution was stable over a 1-year period when stored at a refrigerated (5°C) or frozen (-20°C) temperature in both vials and syringes; with storage at 25°C, the stability duration was lower. The preparation of ready-to-use midazolam solutions by a hospital pharmacy is compatible with clinical practice and could help to decrease risks inherent in dilution in care units.