[Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].

Objective: To evaluate lower facial profile in females in different skeletal patterns. Methods: Investigation pictures of three females with beautiful lower facial profiles from Department of Orthodontics, Henan Stomatological Hospital were collected. The skeletal patterns of these females were classified as average, low and high angle, respectively.Upper lip process point (UL) was moved backwards horizontally to reach towards the E line and go even further gradually in above pictures. The distance changed according to E line was defined as DE value. If UL was in front of E line,DE value was denoted as positive, or else negative. Collectively, we obtained 30 pictures (10 pictures in each skeletal facial type) with different DE values (-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 mm), which were divided into average, low and high angle group according to the skeletal facial type. The pictures were evaluated by 144 randomly-selected adult orthodontic patients [66 males, 78 females, aged (29.4±7.7) years] who visited Department of Orthodontics, Henan Stomatological Hospital from June to September, 2019 and 138 orthodontists (including qualified orthodontists and postgraduate orthodontic students [60 males, 78 females, aged (32.2±7.1) years] who participated orthodontics conferences in Henan Stomatological Hospital in June, 2019. The acceptance rate was calculated and rate above 60% was deemed as acceptable DE range. Evaluators were also asked to choose the most esthetic profiles for the best DE value in each skeletal facial type.Data discrepancy was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis and chi-square test. Results: Most accepted DE was -2 mm among total investigators including orthodonticpatients and orthodontists. There was no difference in total acceptance rate between orthodontists and patients (P>0.05). There was statistic difference in total acceptance rate in different skeletal patterns between orthodontic patients and orthodontists (P<0.05). In total investigators, total acceptance rate was 62.1% (1 752/2 820) in average angle group, 55.4%(1 563/2 820) in high angle group and 33.5%(946/2 820) in low angle group, respectively. Acceptable DE range in three facial types was -4~2 mm (average angle), -2~2 mm (high angle) and -2~-1 mm (low angle), respectively. Conclusions: According to the evaluation of both orthodontic patients and orthodontists, the best DE was-2 mm.Total acceptance rate and acceptable DE range ranked first in average angle group, second in high angle group and third in low angle group.

[MicroRNA-26a-5p targets Wnt5a to regulate osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cell from inflammatory microenvironment].

Objective: To investigate the effect of microRNA-26a-5p on osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSC) and its related mechanisms. Methods: hPDLSC in periodontal tissues from healthy adults and hPDLSC from periodontitis patients (PPDLSC) were isolated and cultured in vitro, respectively. The PPDLSC were divided into Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ groups. Group Ⅰ is control group, and the other four groups were transiently transfected with miR-NC, miR-26a-5p, antimiR-NC and antimiR-26a-5p lentiviral vectors, respectively. The osteogenic differentiation abilities of the cells in vitro were determined by alizarin red staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Totally 40 male mice (6-weeks) were equally divided into five groups with 8 mice in each group. The PPDLSCs cells (1×10(7)/ml) in Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ groups, which adhered to hydroxyapatine-tricalcium phosphate (HA-TCP), were implanted into the nude mice subcutaneously and the animal models were constructed to analyze the effect of miR-26a-5p on the osteogenic differentiation of PPDLSCs in vivo. PPDLSCs were divided into A, B, C, D groups, and transfected with miR-26a-5p+Wnt5a-Wt, miR-NC+Wnt5a-Wt, miR-26a-5p+Wnt5a-Mut and miR-NC+Wnt5a-Mut in each of the above mentioned 5 groups, respectively. The luciferase activity assay was used to detect the relative luciferase in A, B, C and D groups to analyze the targeting relationship between miR-26a-5p and Wnt5a. Osteogenic differentiation related proteins expression were analyzed by western blotting. Results: hPDLSC and PPDLSC were observed consistent with the characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells and had osteogenic differentiation ability in vitro. Compared with hPDLSC [(89.87±8.12)%], the osteogenic capacity of PPDLSC [(31.46±6.56)%] was significantly lower (P<0.05). The ALP activity (1.88±0.59), calcified nodules (79.88±5.92), the expression of the osteogenic differentiation markers Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) (2.40±0.70), ALP (2.10±0.60) and osteocalcin (3.00±0.90) mRNA in the PPDLSC from Group Ⅲ were significantly higher in comparison with the control group [(0.88±0.34), (29.69±2.65), (1.30±0.30), (0.09±0.25), (1.71±0.50)], while those from Group Ⅴ[(0.44±0.07), (14.83±3.05), (0.50±0.11), (0.30±0.08) and (0.80±0.17)] were significantly lower (P<0.05). In vivo studies in nude mice showed that the proportion of the osteogenic region [(34.96±5.65)%] in the miR-26a-5p group was significantly increased in comparison with the control group [(23.28±3.03)%], while in the antimiR-26a-5p group [(8.02±2.27)%] was significantly lower (P<0.05). The luciferase activity of the Group A (0.46±0.06) was significantly lower than Group B (3.46±0.45) (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the expression levels of Wnt5a protein, calmodulin kinase Ⅱ and protein kinase C proteins in the Group Ⅲ were significantly decreased, while those in the GroupⅤ were significantly increased (P<0.05). Conclusions: MicroRNA-26a-5p could promote osteogenic differentiation of PPDLSC in vivo and in vitro, and its mechanism might be inhibiting the activation of Wnt/Ca(2+) signaling pathway by targeting Wnt5a.