Double faecal immunochemical testing in patients with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-directed pathways based on a single test have been implemented for symptomatic patients. However, with a single test, the sensitivity is 87 per cent at 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb) per g faeces. This aims of this study were to define the diagnostic performance of a single FIT, compared with double FIT in symptomatic populations. METHODS: Two sequential prospective patient cohorts referred with symptoms from primary care were studied. Patients in cohort 1 were sent a single FIT, and those in cohort 2 received two tests in succession before investigation. All patients were investigated, regardless of having a positive or negative test (threshold 10 µg Hb per g). RESULTS: In cohort 1, 2260 patients completed one FIT and investigation. The sensitivity of single FIT was 84.1 (95 per cent c.i. 73.3 to 91.8) per cent for colorectal cancer and 67.4 (61.0 to 73.4) per cent for significant bowel pathology. In cohort 2, 3426 patients completed at least one FIT, and 2637 completed both FITs and investigation. The sensitivity of double FIT was 96.6 (90.4 to 99.3) per cent for colorectal cancer and 83.0 (77.4 to 87.8) per cent for significant bowel pathology. The second FIT resulted in a 50.0 per cent reduction in cancers missed by the first FIT, and 30.0 per cent for significant bowel pathology. Correlation between faecal Hb level was only modest (rs = 0.58), and 16.8 per cent of double tests were discordant, 11.4 per cent in patients with colorectal cancer and 18.3 per cent in those with significant bowel pathology. CONCLUSION: FIT in patients with high-risk symptoms twice in succession reduces missed significant colorectal pathology and has an acceptable workload impact.

Metformin as a radiosensitiser for pelvic malignancy: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pelvic malignancies has continued to improve over recent years, with neoadjuvant radiotherapy often considered the gold standard to downstage disease. Radiosensitisers are routinely employed in an attempt to improve response of cancers to radiotherapy. Previous preclinical evidence has suggested a role for metformin, a commonly used drug for type 2 diabetes. METHOD: A literature search was performed for published full text articles using the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases using the search criteria string 'Metformin' AND ('Radiosensitivity' OR 'radiosensitising' OR 'radiosensitising'). Additional papers were detected by scanning the references of relevant papers. Data were extracted from each study by two authors onto a dedicated proforma. The review was registered on the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42020199066). RESULTS: A total of 242 papers were identified, 11 of which were included in this review; an additional 5 papers were obtained from reference searches. Metformin has been demonstrated to reduce cell-viability post-radiotherapy in both rectal and prostate cancer cell lines, with an enhanced effect in tumours with a p53 mutation and increased apoptosis post-radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Clinical trials demonstrate improved tumour and nodal downstaging and pCR rates for rectal cancer using metformin as a radiosensitiser. CONCLUSION: With an increasing understanding of the underlying mechanism of the effects on metformin prospective studies are required to assess the effect of routine use on cancer related outcomes. Progressive future studies may be better served by the use of predictive biomarker guided treatment to enable identification of the appropriate cohort to target.