Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 14(7): 889-899, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33896305

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A research was performed to review the effect of pharmacological interventions to control the propofol injection pain. METHODS: A search of databases was performed. Randomized clinical trials comparing pharmacological interventions with placebo or active compound to reduce of propofol injection pain were selected. The outcome was the frequency of pain. Data were analyzed in three subgroups according to type of control. Random effect model was used to calculate relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Fifty-two articles with 105 studies on 7315 adults were included. The incidence of pain in intervention and control group was 40.91% and 66.27%. Combination therapy with two drugs (RR = 0.29 95% CI = (0.11, 0.75)), opioids (RR = 0.39 95% CI = (0.28, 0.54)) and 5 HT3 antagonists (RR = 0.39 95% CI = (0.30, 0.50)) were the most effective interventions compared to placebo. Combination therapy was the most effective intervention compared to lidocaine as control (RR = 0.51 95% CI = (0.46, 0.55)). Opioids were the most effective intervention compared to long chain triglyceride propofol as control (RR = 0.27 95% CI = (0.15, 0.49)). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with two different drugs, opioids and surprisingly 5 HT3 antagonists were the most effective interventions compared to placebo. Combination therapy was the most effective versus lidocaine as control.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Dolor/prevención & control , Propofol/efectos adversos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/farmacología , Dolor/etiología , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT3/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT3/farmacología
2.
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol ; 29(95): 333-340, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383314

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration is a common life-threatening condition in children. There are controversies in the management of this condition, including the type of ventilation during bronchoscopy. This study aims to compare anesthesia with controlled ventilation versus spontaneous ventilation in rigid bronchoscopy in children with foreign body aspiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were candidates for rigid bronchoscopy due to foreign body aspiration were randomly assigned to either anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation or controlled ventilation. End tidal CO2 (ETCO2), electrocardiogram (ECG), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and complications and accidents during the surgery and recovery were recorded for each patient. Surgeon comfort during the procedure was also evaluated for each patient. A 20% change in HR or NIBP was considered significant. SpO2 values under 90% are considered desaturation. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (31 male and 20 female) entered the study. The mean age was 26.76 months, ranging from 6 to 100 months. Choking and cough were present in 94% and 96.1% of the patients, respectively. Nuts were the most common foreign body (76.9%). The controlled ventilation group had significantly fewer complications, and surgeon comfort was significantly higher in this group. Oxygen desaturation was significantly more prevalent in the spontaneous ventilation group during laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Controlled ventilation has the potential to be used as an effective alternative option in anesthesia for patients with suspected foreign body aspiration.

3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 48(3): 685-8, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23480935

RESUMEN

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia is becoming more popular but technical difficulties in handsewn anastomosis still remain challenging. This article presents an easy and applicable maneuver by passing the trans-esophageal tube before starting to suture in order to minimize the gap, reduce the tension over primary sutures and provide a better visualization of posterolateral parts of the anastomosis in thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair. Using this maneuver makes tying easier and minimizes grasping and crushing damages to the anastomotic site.


Asunto(s)
Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Toracoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...