Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiol Med ; 128(12): 1542-1552, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37640897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy are the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Reported long-term outcomes for treated with both IMRT and 3D-Image-guided-adaptive brachytherapy are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective study included 165 patients with FIGO Stage IB-IVB cervical cancer, treated with chemoradiotherapy in combination with brachytherapy. External beam radiotherapy was delivered as IMRT/VMAT/TOMO helical or 3DCRT. The intracavitary brachytherapy treatment (ICBT) was performed using two different planning system (with or without optimization). RESULTS: Among the patient subgroups, comprising those who received IMRT/VMAT/Tomo helical and 3DCRT, as well as those who underwent ICBT planning optimization and those who did not, homogeneity was observed in terms of age, performance status, T stage, N status, TNM stage, and histology. With a median follow-up time of 60.5 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) in the 3DCRT and IMRT groups was 74.9% and 92.8%, respectively (p = 0.033). The 5-year OS in the ICBT planning optimization group was 93.7%, compared to 75% in the non-optimization group (p = 0.014). Regarding late radiation toxicities, patients in the IMRT group had a lower incidence of chronic rectal toxicity compared to those in the 3DCRT group (6.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.001). The group with ICBT planning optimization had a lower incidence of late urinary toxicities (10.4%) compared to the non-optimized ICBT planning group (18.2%, p = 0.012). Similarly, the ICBT planning optimization group had a lower incidence of late rectal toxicity (6.5% with 80% grade 1 and 20% grade 2) compared to the non-optimized ICBT planning group (34.1%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this series, the group of patients receiving optimized ICBT had an advantage in terms of OS and CSS suggesting that the use of new Treatment Planning Systems associated with 3D imaging, improves the long-term survival. Additionally, a significant reduction in late rectal and urinary toxicity has been observed.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Recto , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Br J Radiol ; 89(1065): 20150981, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27384381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in localized prostate cancer is available since 15 years in Italy. We realized the first national multicentre and multidisciplinary data collection to evaluate LDR-BT practice, given as monotherapy, and outcome in terms of biochemical failure. METHODS: Between May 1998 and December 2011, 2237 patients with early-stage prostate cancer from 11 Italian community and academic hospitals were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) or palladium-103 LDR-BT as monotherapy and followed up for at least 2 years. (125)I seeds were implanted in 97.7% of the patients: the mean dose received by 90% of target volume was 145 Gy; the mean target volume receiving 100% of prescribed dose (V100) was 91.1%. Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate the relationship of covariates with outcomes. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 65 months. 5- and 7-year DSS, OS and BFFS were 99 and 98%, 94 and 89%, and 92 and 88%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network score (p < 0.0001) and V100 (p = 0.09) were correlated with BFFS, with V100 effect significantly different between patients at low risk and those at intermediate/high risk (p = 0.04). Short follow-up and lack of toxicity data represent the main limitations for a global evaluation of LDR-BT. CONCLUSION: This first multicentre Italian report confirms LDR-BT as an excellent curative modality for low-/intermediate-risk prostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Multidisciplinary teams may help to select adequately patients to be treated with brachytherapy, with a direct impact on the implant quality and, possibly, on outcome.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 101(2): 311-5, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22079529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate survival, locoregional control and toxicity in a series of 56 mesothelioma patients treated from May 2005 to May 2010 with post-operative radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) in three Italian Institutions (Brescia, Florence, and Modena). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after EPP were analyzed. Four patients were treated with 3DCRT, 50 with IMRT and two with helical tomotherapy. Forty-five to 50 Gy in 25 fractions were given to the affected hemithorax and to ipsilateral mediastinum, with a simultaneous integrated boost to the sites of microscopically involved margins up to 60 Gy in 20/56 cases. RESULTS: Three year locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis free (DMF), disease free (DF), disease specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates are 90%, 66%, 57%, 62%, and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Postoperative RT with modern techniques is an effective method to obtain excellent local control and cure rates in mesothelioma patients submitted to EPP.


Asunto(s)
Mesotelioma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pleurales/radioterapia , Neumonectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Corazón/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Italia , Riñón/efectos de la radiación , Hígado/efectos de la radiación , Masculino , Mesotelioma/patología , Mesotelioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...