Incidence of acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery: a comparison of the AKIN and KDIGO criteria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data on urine output have not been routinely presented to define cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury (AKI). We evaluated the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery based on the AKIN and KDIGO criteria (considering serum creatinine concentration and urine output in the first 72 hours postoperatively) and compared the performance of the 2 criteria for AKI staging. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve replacement, or CABG + valve replacement between October 2017 and April 2018 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if baseline creatinine concentration (measured within 7 days before surgery) was ≥ 2.5 mg.dL-1. Patients were evaluated for the development of AKI based on changes in urine output and serum creatinine concentration, measured daily from postoperative day 1 to 7, according to the AKIN and KDIGO criteria, which were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included. AKI occurred in 83.8% by AKIN and in 82.8% by KDIGO, when using both urine output and serum creatinine concentration as defining criteria. Using serum creatinine concentration alone, the incidence of AKI fell to 27.3% by AKIN and to 24.7% by KDIGO. A kappa coefficient of 0.98 was obtained between the AKIN and KDIGO criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Almost perfect agreement was found between AKIN and KDIGO. AKI may be underdiagnosed after cardiac surgery if serum creatinine concentration is used as the only defining criterion. Our findings underscore the fundamental importance of using the urine output criterion in the assessment of patients at risk for AKI.

Manejo anestésico e complicações no implante percutâneo de válvula aórtica / Anesthetic management and complications of percutaneous aortic valve implantation / Manejo anestésico y complicaciones en el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A estenose aórtica (EA) grave é uma doença prevalente e de grande mortalidade. Nos pacientes idosos com outras comorbidades o implante valvar percutâneo é uma opção. OBJETIVOS: Descrever o manejo anestésico e as complicações com anestesia geral. MÉTODO: Série de casos com seguimento de 30 dias e 24 meses após o implante do dispositivo CoreValve feito no Instituto de Cardiologia/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia entre dezembro de 2008 e janeiro de 2012. Os pacientes foram submetidos à anestesia geral monitorada com pressão arterial média (PAM), eletrocardiograma (ECG), oximetria, capnografia, ecocardiograma transesofágico, termometria e marcapasso transvenoso. RESULTADOS: Foram submetidos com sucesso ao implante valvular 28 pacientes, com idade média de 82,46 anos, EuroScore médio de 20,98%, classe funcional III/IV. Nove pacientes necessitaram de implante de marcapasso definitivo. No seguimento dos pacientes houve dois óbitos, um no transoperatório por perfuração do VE e um no terceiro dia por causa desconhecida. Em 24 meses um paciente faleceu com diagnóstico de mieloma múltiplo. A técnica anestésica mostrou-se segura. CONCLUSÃO: A experiência inicial com implante valvular aórtico percutâneo sob anestesia geral tem se mostrado segura e eficaz sem complicações anestésicas importantes para esse procedimento.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Aortic stenosis is a highly prevalent and life-threatening disease. In elderly patients with comorbidities, percutaneous valve implantation is an option. The aim of the study was to describe the anesthetic management and complications of general anesthesia. METHOD: Case series with 30-day and 24-month follow-ups after implantation of the CoreValve device performed at the Institute of Cardiology/University Foundation of Cardiology between December 2008 and January 2012. The patients underwent general anesthesia monitored with mean arterial pressure (PAM), electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetry, capnography, transesophageal echocardiography, thermometry, and transvenous pacemaker. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients, mean age 82.46 years, 20.98% mean EuroSCORE, functional class III/IV, successfully underwent valve implantation. Nine patients required permanent pacemaker implantation. During follow-up, two patients died: one during surgery due to LV perforation and the other on the third day of unknown causes. At 24 months, one patient diagnosed with multiple myeloma died. This anesthetic technique proved to be safe. CONCLUSION: The initial experience with percutaneous aortic valve implantation under general anesthesia has proven to be safe and effective, with no significant anesthetic complications during this procedure.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La estenosis aórtica (EA) grave es una enfermedad prevalente y de gran mortalidad. En los pacientes ancianos con otras comorbilidades, el implante valvular percutáneo es una opción. OBJETIVOS: Describir el manejo anestésico y las complicaciones con la anestesia general. MÉTODO: Serie de casos con seguimiento de 30 días y 24 meses después del implante del dispositivo CoreValve hecho en el Instituto de Cardiología/Fundación Universitaria de Cardiología entre diciembre de 2008 y enero de 2012. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a la anestesia general monitorizada con una presión arterial promedio (PAP), electrocardiograma (ECG), oximetría, capnografía, ecocardiograma transesofágico, termometría y marcapaso transvenoso. RESULTADOS: Fueron sometidos con éxito al implante valvular 28 pacientes, con una edad promedio de 82,46 años, EuroScore medio de 20,98%, clase funcional III/IV. Nueve pacientes necesitaron implante de marcapaso definitivo. En el seguimiento de los pacientes hubo dos decesos, uno en el transoperatorio por perforación del VI y uno al tercer día por causa desconocida. En 24 meses un paciente falleció con diagnóstico de mieloma múltiple. La técnica anestésica fue segura. CONCLUSIONES: La experiencia inicial con implante valvular aórtico percutáneo bajo anestesia general ha sido segura y eficaz sin complicaciones anestésicas importantes para ese procedimiento.

Anesthetic management and complications of percutaneous aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Aortic stenosis is a highly prevalent and life-threatening disease. In elderly patients with comorbidities, percutaneous valve implantation is an option. The aim of the study was to describe the anesthetic management and complications of general anesthesia. METHOD: Case series with 30-day and 24-month follow-ups after implantation of the CoreValve device performed at the Institute of Cardiology/University Foundation of Cardiology between December 2008 and January 2012. The patients underwent general anesthesia monitored with mean arterial pressure (PAM), electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetry, capnography, transesophageal echocardiography, thermometry, and transvenous pacemaker. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients, mean age 82.46 years, 20.98% mean EuroSCORE, functional class III/IV, successfully underwent valve implantation. Nine patients required permanent pacemaker implantation. During follow-up, two patients died: one during surgery due to LV perforation and the other on the third day of unknown causes. At 24 months, one patient diagnosed with multiple myeloma died. This anesthetic technique proved to be safe. CONCLUSION: The initial experience with percutaneous aortic valve implantation under general anesthesia has proven to be safe and effective, with no significant anesthetic complications during this procedure.