RESUMEN
Objective: A novel transdermal arterial gasotransmitter sensor (TAGS) has been tested as a diagnostic tool for lower limb microvascular disease in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The TAGS system noninvasively measures hydrogen sulfide (H2S) emitted from the skin. Measurements were made on the forearm and lower limbs of individuals from three cohorts, including subjects with DM and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, to evaluate skin microvascular integrity. These measurements were compared with diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (PAD) using the standard approach of the toe brachial index. Other measures of vascular health were made in some subjects including fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, plasma lipids, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration, and body mass index. Results: The leg:arm ratio of H2S emissions correlated with risk factors for microvascular disease (ie, high-density lipoprotein levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c). The ratios were significantly lower in symptomatic DM subjects being treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (n = 8, 0.48 ± 0.21) compared with healthy controls (n = 5, 1.08 ± 0.30; P = .0001) and with asymptomatic DM subjects (n = 4, 0.79 ± 0.08; P = .0086). The asymptomatic DM group ratios were also significantly lower than the healthy controls (P = .0194). Using ratios of leg:arm transdermal H2S measurement (17 subjects, 34 ratios), the overall accuracy to identify limbs with severe PAD had an area under the curve of the receiver operating curve of 0.93. Conclusions: Ratios of transdermal H2S measurements are lower in legs with impaired microvascular function, and the decrease in ratio precedes clinically apparent severe microvascular disease and diabetic ulcers. The TAGS instrument is a novel, sensitive tool that may aid in the early detection and monitoring of PAD complications and efforts for limb salvage.
RESUMEN
Importance: The outcomes of firearm injuries in the United States are devastating. Although firearm mortality and costs have been investigated, the long-term outcomes after surviving a gunshot wound (GSW) remain unstudied. Objective: To determine the long-term functional, psychological, emotional, and social outcomes among survivors of firearm injuries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study assessed patient-reported outcomes among GSW survivors from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017, at a single urban level I trauma center. Attempts were made to contact all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) discharged alive during the study period. A total of 3088 patients were identified; 516 (16.7%) who died during hospitalization and 45 (1.5%) who died after discharge were excluded. Telephone contact was made with 263 (10.4%) of the remaining patients, and 80 (30.4%) declined study participation. The final study sample consisted of 183 participants. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2018, through June 20, 2019. Exposures: A GSW sustained from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores on 8 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Physical Function, Emotional Support, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Pain Intensity, Alcohol Use, and Severity of Substance Use) and the Primary Care PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Results: Of the 263 patients who survived a GSW and were contacted, 183 (69.6%) participated. Participants were more likely to be admitted to the hospital compared with those who declined (150 [82.0%] vs 54 [67.5%]; P = .01). Participants had a median time from GSW of 5.9 years (range, 4.7-8.1 years) and were primarily young (median age, 27 years [range, 21-36 years]), black (168 [91.8%]), male (169 [92.3%]), and employed before GSW (pre-GSW, 139 [76.0%]; post-GSW, 113 [62.1%]; decrease, 14.3%; P = .004). Combined alcohol and substance use increased by 13.2% (pre-GSW use, 56 [30.8%]; post-GSW use, 80 [44.0%]). Participants had mean (SD) scores below population norms (50 [10]) for Global Physical Health (45 [11]; P < .001), Global Mental Health (48 [11]; P = .03), and Physical Function (45 [12]; P < .001) PROMIS metrics. Eighty-nine participants (48.6%) had a positive screen for probable PTSD. Patients who required intensive care unit admission (n = 64) had worse mean (SD) Physical Function scores (42 [13] vs 46 [11]; P = .045) than those not requiring the intensive care unit. Survivors no more than 5 years after injury had greater PTSD risk (38 of 63 [60.3%] vs 51 of 119 [42.9%]; P = .03) but better mean (SD) Global Physical Health scores (47 [11] vs 43 [11]; P = .04) than those more than 5 years after injury. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's results suggest that the lasting effects of firearm injury reach far beyond mortality and economic burden. Survivors of GSWs may have negative outcomes for years after injury. These findings suggest that early identification and initiation of long-term longitudinal care is paramount.
