Fertility specialists' views, behavior, and attitudes towards the use of endometrial scratching in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial scratching (ES) or injury is intentional damage to the endometrium performed to improve reproductive outcomes for infertile women desiring pregnancy. Moreover, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials demonstrated that ES is not effective, data on the safety are limited, and it should not be recommended in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to assess the view and behavior towards ES among fertility specialists throughout infertility centers in Italy, and the relationship between these views and the attitudes towards the use of ES as an add-on in their commercial setting. METHODS: Online survey among infertility centers, affiliated to Italian Society of Human Reproduction (SIRU), was performed using a detailed questionnaire including 45 questions with the possibility to give "closed" multi-choice answers for 41 items and "open" answers for 4 items. Online data from the websites of the infertility centers resulting in affiliation with the specialists were also recorded and analyzed. The quality of information about ES given on infertility centers websites was assessed using a scoring matrix including 10 specific questions (scored from 0 to 2 points), and the possible scores ranged from 0 to 13 points ('excellent' if the score was 9 points or more, 'moderate' if the score was between 5 and 8, and 'poor' if it was 4 points or less). RESULTS: The response rate was of 60.6% (43 questionnaires / 71 infertility SIRU-affiliated centers). All included questionnaires were completed in their entirety. Most physicians (~ 70%) reported to offer ES to less than 10% of their patients. The procedure is mainly performed in the secretory phase (69.2%) using pipelle (61.5%), and usually in medical ambulatory (56.4%) before IVF cycles to improve implantation (71.8%) without drugs administration (e.g., pain drugs, antibiotics, anti-hemorrhagics, or others) before (76.8%) or after (64.1%) the procedure. Only a little proportion of infertility centers included in the analysis proposes formally the ES as an add-on procedure (9.3%), even if, when proposed, the full description of the indications, efficacy, safety, and costs is never addressed. However, the overall information quality of the websites was generally "poor" ranging from 3 to 8 and having a low total score (4.7 ± 1.6; mean ± standard deviation). CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, ES is a procedure still performed among fertility specialists for improving the implantation rate in IVF patients. Moreover, they have a poor attitude in proposing ES as an add-on in the commercial setting.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How does use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia affect endometrial hyperplasia regression and pregnancy rates compared with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)? DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included 215 infertile women with an indication for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed by hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy. At the time of first- and second-line treatment, patients were offered therapy with either oral MPA 10 mg daily or LNG-IUS. Follow-up biopsies were scheduled after 90 days' treatment. After endometrial hyperplasia regression, patients were admitted to IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and confounders including age at diagnosis, body mass index and duration of infertility did not differ between LNG-IUS users and control participants and were accounted for using propensity score weighting. Endometrial hyperplasia regression rate at first follow-up was higher in the LNG-IUS group than the oral progestins group (28/28, 100% and 110/187, 58.8%; P < 0.001), while that after second-line treatment was comparable between the two groups (89/91, 97.8% and 122/124, 98.4%; P = 0.22). Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and cumulative live birth rate following ART in patients ever receiving LNG-IUS were similar to those of patients receiving only MPA (34% versus 39.5%, 22.6% versus 34.7% and 26.4% versus 25.8%). CONCLUSION: Endometrial hyperplasia regression is greater in women receiving LNG-IUS compared with oral MPA, while live birth rates following ART are comparable between the two groups. The use of LNG-IUS does not jeopardize the chances of pregnancy in women seeking fertility treatment.

ALADDIN study: does assisted hatching of vitrified/warmed blastocysts improve live birth rate? Protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest a higher clinical pregnancy rate performing assisted hatching (AH) on previously cryopreserved embryos but fail to demonstrate significant effects on live birth rate. However, current evidence is based on studies with a small sample size and may hide a type II error. Moreover, poor attention has been given to the specific effect of AH on frozen/thawed blastocysts. To shed light on this topic, we developed the present protocol for a randomised trial to investigate the benefits of the laser-mediated partial removal of the zona pellucida in vitrified/warmed blastocysts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa removal by assisteD hatchINg of blastocysts (ALADDIN) study is a multicentric prospective comparative study with a parallel randomised controlled design aiming to investigate whether AH performed on warmed blastocysts before embryo transfer can improve live birth rate. Women allocated to the control group will undergo embryo transfer of blastocysts not previously subjected to AH. Two infertility units will be involved in the study. Enrolment of patients will last 18 months with quarterly monitoring and the entire study is foreseen to be closed in 36 months. Secondary outcomes include: proportion of transferred blastocysts/thawed blastocyst, morphological features of blastocysts before embryo transfer, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy (ultrasound visible gestational sac), miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation), obstetrical and neonatal complications and congenital anomaly rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol received a favourable ethical opinion from the Ethical Committee of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and the Ethical Committee Area 2 Milan. Each participant will provide written consent to participate and remain encoded during the study. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03623659; Pre-results.

Continuous low-dose oral contraceptive in the treatment of colorectal endometriosis evaluated by rectal endoscopic ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: Limited attention has been focused on the medical treatment of bowel endometriosis. This study evaluates the efficacy of administration of a continuous low-dose oral contraceptive in treating pain and other symptoms associated with colorectal endometriotic nodules, as evaluated by rectal endoscopic ultrasonography. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Academic Department of San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit. POPULATION: Symptomatic women of reproductive age (n=26) with colorectal nodules infiltrating at least the bowel muscularis propria and without a stenosis >50%. In 31% of the patients, endoscopic ultrasonography permitted diagnosis of nodules located more than 10 cm from the anal rim. METHODS: Patients received a continuous low-dose oral contraceptive containing 15 µg ethinylestradiol and 60 µg gestodene for 12 months. Subjective symptoms were prospectively evaluated, and nodule volumes were monitored using endoscopic ultrasonography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nodule measurements were performed at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. Symptoms at the start and after 12 months were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the intensity of all the considered symptoms (dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia and painful defecation) was seen when evaluated by a visual analog scale. A reduction in terms of both diameter (mean reduction 26%) and volume of the nodules (mean reduction 62%) was observed after a 12 month period. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous low-dose oral contraceptive therapy may reduce bowel endometriosis-associated symptoms. In addition, this therapy induces a significant volumetric reduction of colorectal plaques when evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Role of DEXA and ultrasonometry in the evaluation of osteoporotic risk in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the role of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the assessment of osteoporosis. METHODS: From June 1999 to November 2001, 596 women who have not been diagnosed osteoporosis and without previous history of pathologic fractures were enrolled in this study. They had a mean age of 58.7+/-8.5 years, a mean height of 166+/-3.5 cm and a mean weight of 66+/-4.1 kg. According to the age, women were divided into three groups: group A included women between 45 and 55 years; group B women between 56 and 66 years and group C women between 67 and 77 years. Each patient underwent to both methods to determine the presence of osteoporosis. RESULTS: QUS resulted in a greater number of women of group A at risk of osteoporosis, whereas DEXA indicated that more women of group C were at increased osteoporotic risk. QUS and DEXA gave concordant results only in women of group B. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that QUS screening for osteoporosis may be more suitable for 'younger' postmenopausal women.